Density-functional-theory investigation of antiproton-helium collisions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Henkel, Nils ^a   Keim, Matthias ^b   Lüdde, Hans Jürgen ^b   Kirchner, Tom ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION SYSTEMS; CORRELATION POTENTIAL; EXCHANGE POTENTIALS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; IONIZATION CROSS SECTION; IONIZATION PROBABILITIES; IONIZATION PROCESS; KOHN-SHAM POTENTIAL; LASER-INDUCED IONIZATION; LINE TRAJECTORY; ORDER OF MAGNITUDE; PROJECTILE ENERGY; PROJECTILE MOTION; SMALL ENERGY; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; TIME DEPENDENT DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; TOTAL CROSS SECTION;

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; HELIUM; IONIZATION OF LIQUIDS; PROJECTILES; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

IONIZATION POTENTIAL;

EID: 69949129784     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032704     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. M. Lein and S. Kümmel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143003 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.143003
2. F. Wilken and D. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 203001 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.203001
3. M. Keim, A. Achenbach, H. J. Lüdde, and T. Kirchner, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062711 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062711
4. E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997
5. J. Schirmer and A. Dreuw, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022513 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022513
6. N. T. Maitra, R. van Leeuwen, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. A 78, 056501 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.056501
7. J. Schirmer and A. Dreuw, Phys. Rev. A 78, 056502 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.056502
8. E. K. U. Gross, J. F. Dobson, and M. Petersilka, Density Functional Theory, Topics in Current Chemistry (Springer, New York, 1996).
9. G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062511 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062511
10. H. J. Lüdde, in Many-Particle Quantum Dynamics in Atomic and Molecular Fragmentation, edited by, J. Ullrich, and, V. P. Shevelko, (Springer, Heidelberg, 2003), p. 205.
11. E. Engel and S. H. Vosko, Phys. Rev. A 47, 2800 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.2800
12. O. J. Kroneisen, H. J. Lüdde, T. Kirchner, and R. M. Dreizler, J. Phys. A 32, 2141 (1999). 10.1088/0305-4470/32/11/009
13. H. Knudsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 043201 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101. 043201
14. P. Hvelplund, H. Knudsen, U. Mikkelsen, E. Morenzoni, S. P. Moller, E. Uggerhoj, and T. Wormand, J. Phys. B 27, 925 (1994). 10.1088/0953-4075/27/5/012
15. C. Diaz, F. Martin, and A. Salin, J. Phys. B 33, 4373 (2000). 10.1088/0953-4075/33/20/314
16. G. Bent, P. S. KrstiÄ, and D. R. Schultz, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 1459 (1998). 10.1063/1.475518
17. A. Igarashi, A. Ohsaki, and S. Nakazaki, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052722 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052722
18. T. G. Lee, H. C. Tseng, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062713 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062713
19. M. Foster, J. Colgan, and M. S. Pindzola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033201 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.033201
20. T. Bronk, J. F. Reading, and A. L. Ford, J. Phys. B 31, 2477 (1998). 10.1088/0953-4075/31/11/011
21. H. Knudsen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 267, 244 (2009). 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.070
22. L. Landau and E. Lifschitz, Mechanics, Sec. 39, 3rd ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1976).
23. Note that if one would replace n by its adiabatic approximation not only in Eq. 18 but also in Eq. 17, one would obtain Ic =â1/2 I2 and p2+ =0 for 0â‰Iâ‰1. Similarly, for 1â‰Iâ ‰2, one would obtain Ic =â1/2 (2âI) 2 and p0+ =0.
24. We did not use the full time-dependent density in Eq. 25 because of the technical problems mentioned above. However, we also mimicked this dynamical effect by weighing the integral with the time-dependent ionization I and obtained practically the same results.