Real-time renormalization group in frequency space: A two-loop analysis of the nonequilibrium anisotropic Kondo model at finite magnetic field

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Schoeller, Herbert ^a,b   Reininghaus, Frank ^a,b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b JARA Fundamentals of Future Information Technology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949120613     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.045117     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
2. L. I. Glazman and M. E. Raikh, Sov. Phys. JETP 47, 452 (1988);
3. T. K. Ng and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1768 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1768
4. D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Hadas Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, David Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M. A. Kastner, Nature (London) 391, 156 (1998); 10.1038/34373
5. Sara M. Cronenwett, Tjerk H. Oosterkamp, and Leo P. Kouwenhoven, Science 281, 540 (1998); 10.1126/science.281.5376.540
6. F. Simmel, R. H. Blick, J. P. Kotthaus, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 804 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.804
7. N. Andrei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 379 (1980); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.379
8. P. B. Wiegmann, JETP Lett. 31, 364 (1980);
9. A. M. Tsvelick and P. B. Wiegmann, Adv. Phys. 32, 453 (1983). 10.1080/00018738300101581
10. A. W. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3160 (1991); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3160
11. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7297 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.7297
12. K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975). 10.1103/RevModPhys.47.773
13. T. A. Costi, A. C. Hewson, and V. Zlatic, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 2519 (1994). 10.1088/0953-8984/6/13/013
14. P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. C 3, 2436 (1970); 10.1088/0022-3719/3/12/008
15. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 416 (1978). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 40.416
16. F. B. Anders and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 196801 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.196801
17. F. B. Anders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 066804 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.066804
18. S. Weiss, J. Eckel, M. Thorwart, and R. Egger, Phys. Rev. B 77, 195316 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.195316
19. N. Andrei and G. Palacios (private communication).
20. P. Coleman, C. Hooley, and O. Parcollet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4088 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4088
21. A. Kaminski, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 62, 8154 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.8154
22. A. Rosch, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 156802 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.156802
23. D. V. Averin and A. A. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. A 140, 251 (1989); 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90934-1
24. D. V. Averin and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2446 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2446
25. H. Schoeller, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 168, 179 (2009). 10.1140/epjst/e2009-00962-3
26. E. Sela, H. S. Sim, Y. Oreg, M. E. Raikh, and F. von Oppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 056809 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.056809
27. L. I. Glazman and M. Pustilnik, in Nanophysics: Coherence and Transport, edited by, H. Bouchiat, (Elsevier, New York, 2005), p. 427; note that a typing error occured in Eq. (5.63) of this reference, the coefficient in front of the θ -function must be 3 and not 2.
28. A. Rosch, J. Paaske, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 076804 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.076804
29. A. Rosch, J. Paaske, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 118 (2005). 10.1143/JPSJ.74.118
30. C. Romeike, M. R. Wegewijs, W. Hofstetter, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 196601 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.196601
31. H. B. Heersche, Z. de Groot, J. A. Folk, H. S. J. van der Zant, C. Romeike, M. R. Wegewijs, L. Zobbi, D. Barreca, E. Tondello, and A. Cornia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 206801 (2006); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.206801
32. M. H. Jo, Nano Lett. 6, 2014 (2006). 10.1021/nl061212i
33. F. Wegner, Ann. Phys. 3, 77 (1994); 10.1002/andp.19945060203
34. S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5863 (1993); 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.5863
35. S. D. Glazek and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4214 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.4214
36. S. Kehrein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 056602 (2005); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 056602
37. P. Fritsch and S. Kehrein, arXiv:0811.0759 (unpublished).
38. H. Schoeller and J. König, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3686 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3686
39. H. Schoeller, in Low-Dimensional Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by, T. Brandes, (Springer, New York, 2000), p. 137.
40. T. Korb, F. Reininghaus, H. Schoeller, and J. König, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165316 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165316
41. S. G. Jakobs, V. Meden, and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 150603 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.150603
42. J. Paaske, A. Rosch, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155301 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.155301
43. J. Koch, M. E. Raikh, and F. von Oppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 056803 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.056803
44. N. Andrei, K. Furuya, and J. H. Lowenstein, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 331 (1983). 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.331
45. J. Paaske, A. Rosch, and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. B 69, 155330 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.155330
46. M. Garst, P. Wölfle, L. Borda, J. von Delft, and L. I. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B 72, 205125 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.205125
47. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
48. B. Doyon and N. Andrei, Phys. Rev. B 73, 245326 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245326
49. J. Solyom and A. Zawadowski, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 4, 80 (1974). 10.1088/0305-4608/4/1/009
50. L. V. Keldysh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964)
51. L. V. Keldysh, [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965)];
52. L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1962).
53. R. Leturcq, L. Schmid, K. Ensslin, Y. Meir, D. C. Driscoll, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 126603 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.126603
54. Our convention is that all terms on the r.h.s. of the RG equation which are of O (G2) [O (G3)] are called one-loop (two-loop) terms. For the RG of the vertices, this is in agreement with the conventional classification but the two RG diagrams in Fig. 4 for the Liouvillian are also called two-loop and three-loop terms in the literature.