Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: First experience

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 552-559

  Nakano, Shogo ^a   Yoshida, Miwa ^a   Fujii, Kimihito ^a   Yorozuya, Kyoko ^a   Mouri, Yukako ^a   Kousaka, Junko ^a   Fukutomi, Takashi ^a   Kimura, Junko ^a   Ishiguchi, Tsuneo ^a   Ohno, Kazuko ^b   Mizumoto, Takao ^c   Harao, Michiko ^d  

^a AICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c Health Insurance Hitoyoshi General Hospital   (Japan)

^d TOCHIGI CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Incidental enhancing lesion; MRI; Real time virtual sonography; Sonography

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMANGIOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; REAL TIME VIRTUAL SONOGRAPHY; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 69949113989     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyp087     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226: 773-8.
2. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:901-10.
3. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology 2000;215:267-79.
4. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238:42-53.
5. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, Verdecchia A, Santaquilani M, Musumeci R, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): Interim results. Radiology 2007;242:698-715.
6. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1249-54.
7. Teifke A, Lehr HA, Vomweg TW, Hlawatsch A, Thelen M. Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:655-62.
8. Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1798-804.
9. Demartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1128-34.
10. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: Utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 2003;227:856-61.
11. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, Paquelet J, Sickle-Santanello B. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 2005;190:592-4.
12. Bassett LW, Dhaliwal SG, Eradat J, Khan O, Farria DF, Brenner RJ, et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:332-9.
13. Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Nakai G, Tanikake M, Yoshikawa S, Narabayashi I, et al. Hepatic computed tomography for simultaneous depiction of hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic portal veins, and hepatic veins in real-time virtual sonography: Initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1065-9.
14. Nakano S, Yorozuya K, Takasugi M, Mouri Y, Fukutomi T, Arai O, et al. Detection of enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using real-time virtual sonography; fusion of MRI and sonography data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;106:S13 (abstract 43).
15. Nakano S, Yorozuya K, Takasugi M, Mouri Y, Fukutomi T, Mitake T. Real-time virtual sonography (RVS): A new virtual reality technique for detection of enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast by using sonography. Nippon Rinsho 2007;65(Suppl 6):304-9 (in Japanese).
16. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 4th edn. Reston, VA, 2003.
17. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: Clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501.
18. Causer PA, Piron CA, Jong RA, Plewes DB. Preliminary in vivo validation of a dedicated breast MRI and sonographic coregistration imaging system. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1203-7.
19. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Initial clinical experience. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:183-93.
20. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: Initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:54-61.
21. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, Bartella L, Morris EA, Joo S, et al. Imaging histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:852-9.
22. Lehman CD, Aikawa T. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Accuracy of targeting and success in sampling in a phantom model. Radiology 2004;232:911-4.
23. Kudo M. New sonographic techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2007;37(Suppl 2):S193-9.
24. Kawasoe H, Eguchi Y, Mizuta T, Yasutake T, Ozaki I, Shimonishi T, et al. Radiofrequency ablation with the real-time virtual sonography system for treating hepatocellular carcinoma difficult to detect by ultrasonography. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2007;40:66-72.
25. Kitada T, Murakami T, Kuzushita N, Minamitani K, Nakajo K, Osuga K, et al. Effectiveness of real-time virtual sonography-guided radiofrequency ablation treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatol Res 2008;38:565-71.
26. Minami Y, Chung H, Kudo M, Kitai S, Takahashi S, Inoue T, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Value of virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W335-41.
27. Nakai M, Sato M, Sahara S, Takasaka I, Kawai N, Minamiguchi H, et al. Radiofrequency ablation assisted by real-time virtual sonography and CT for hepatocellular carcinoma undetectable by conventional sonography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:62-9.
28. Ukimura O, Mitterberger M, Okihara K, Miki T, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, et al. Real-time virtual ultrasonographic radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2008;101:707-11.
29. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast 2006;15:137-40.
30. Nakamura R, Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Sangai T, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using supine magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 2008;17:245-51.
31. Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:62-8.
32. Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Sato N, Iwamoto E, Watanabe T, Katsumata N, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography before neoadjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients likely to be treated safely with breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg 2004;239:238-43.
33. Shimauchi A, Yamada T, Sato A, Takase K, Usami S, Ishida T, et al. Comparison of MDCT and MRI for evaluating the intraductal component of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:322-9.
34. Harada-Shoji N, Yamada T, Ishida T, Amari M, Suzuki A, Moriya T, et al. Usefulness of lesion image mapping with multidetector-row helical computed tomography using a dedicated skin marker in breast-conserving surgery. Eur Radiol 2009;19:868-74.