A rhetorical approach to single-sourcing via intertextuality

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 83-101

  Sapienza, Filipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949109418     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572250709336578     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albers, M., 2003. Single-sourcing and the technical communication career path. Technical Communication, 50: 335-343.
2. Ament, K., 2003. Single-sourcing: Building modular documentation, Norwich, CT: William Andrew.
3. Bolter, J. D., 1993. “ Hypertext and the rhetorical canons. ”. In Rhetorical memory and delivery, Edited by: Reynolds, J. F., 97-112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Coe, R., 1987. An apology for form; or, who took the form out of the process?. College English, 49: 13-28.
5. Dick, K., 2000. XML: A manager's guide., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Gage, J., 1981. In the arresting eye: The rhetoric of imagism., Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
7. Greene, T., 1982. The light in Troy: Imitation and discovery in Renaissance Poetry., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Hall, W., 2001. Writing and managing maintenance procedures for a class of warships: A case for structured authoring and content management. Technical Communication, 48: 235-248.
9. Hart-Davidson, W., Moore, V., & Porter, J. (2002). Modeling flexible document structures with XML schema: Rhetorical objects and rhetorical metadata. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from http://home.nycap.rr.com/vlmoore/portfolio/ro.whitepaper.pdf
10. Lachmann, R., 1997. Memory and literature: Intertextuality in Russian modernism, Edited by: Sellars, R., and Wall, A., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Re: [DITA] Darwin Information Typing Architecture anyone? Message posted to http://lyris.acs.ttu.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?sub=2727655&id=309049855
12. Landow, G., 1992. Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Lanham, R., 1993. The electronic word., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Mandelshtam, O., 1979. Critical prose and letters, Edited by: Harris, J. G., Harris, J. G., and Link, C., Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
15. Mandelshtam, O., 1990. “ O prirode slova [On the nature of the word] ”. In Sochineniia v dvukh tomakh [Collected works in two volumes]. T.2., Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura.
16. Miller, C. R., 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-167.
17. Nichols, C., 2002. Responding in kind: Down in the body in the undergraduate poetry course. Thoughts on Bakhtin, hypertext, and cheap wigs. Enculturation, 4 Retrieved August 30, 2005, from http://enculturation.gmu.edu/4_1/responding
18. Pollak, N., 1995. Mandelstam the reader, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Ronen, O., 1983. An approach to Mandel'štam., Jerusalem: Magnes.
20. Rusinko, E., 1978. Russian acmeism and Anglo-American imagism. Ulbandis Review, 2: 37-49.
21. Sapienza, F., 2002. Does being technical matter? XML, single-source, and technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32: 155-170.
22. Southam, B. C., 1996. A guide to the selected poems of T. S. Eliot., San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
23. Terras, V., 1985. Handbook of Russian literature., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24. Williams, J., 2003. The implications of single-sourcing for technical communicators. Technical Communication, 50: 321-326.
25. Williams, J., 2004. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace., New York: Longman.