Ethnic differences in spatial mobility: The impact of family ties

Population, Space and Place

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 323-342

  Zorlu, Aslan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Family ties; Migrants; Residential mobility

Indexed keywords

ETHNIC CONFLICT; ETHNICITY; IMMIGRATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN SOCIETY;

AMSTERDAM [NORTH HOLLAND]; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; NORTH HOLLAND; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 69949104538     PISSN: 15448444     EISSN: 15448452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psp.560     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alba RD, Logan JR, Stults BJ, Marzan G, Zhang W. 1999. Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review 64: 446-460.
2. Bolt G, Hooimeijer P, van Kempen R. 2002. Ethnic segregation in the Netherlands: New patterns, new policies? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93: 214-220.
3. Card D, Mas A, Rothstein J. 2008. Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 177-218.
4. Clark WAV. 1991. Residential preferences and neighbourhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography 28: 1-19.
5. Clark WAV, Ledwith V. 2006. Mobility, housing stress, and neighbourhood contexts: evidence from Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A 38: 1077-1093.
6. Clark WAV, Deurloo MC, Dieleman FM. 2006. Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes. Housing Studies 21: 323-342.
7. Crowder K. 2000. The racial context of white mobility: an individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research 29: 223-257.
8. Davies PS, Greenwood MJ, Li H. 2001. A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. Journal of Regional Science 41: 337-360.
9. Dawkins CJ. 2006. Are social networks the ties that bind families to neighbourhoods? Housing Studies 21: 867-881.
10. Deurloo MC, Musterd S. 1998. Ethnic clusters in Amsterdam, 1994-96: a micro-area analysis. Urban Studies 35: 385-396.
11. Michielin F, Mulder CH, Zorlu A. 2008. Distance to parents and geographical mobility. Population, Space and Place 14: 327-345.
12. Mulder CH. 1993. Migration Dynamics: A Life Course Approach. Thesis Publishers: Amsterdam.
13. Mulder CH. 2007. The family context and residential choice: a challenge for new research. Population, Space and Place 13: 265-278.
14. Musterd S, De Vos S. 2007. Residential dynamics in ethnic concentrations. Housing Studies 22: 333-353.
15. Onderzoek en Statistiek. 2008. Statistics Office of Amsterdam Municipality. Available at http://urlwww.os.amsterdam.nl/
16. Sander W. 2005. On the demand for city living. Journal of Economic Geography 5: 351-364.
17. Schans D. 2007. Ethnic diversity in intergenerational solidarity. PhD thesis, ICS, Utrecht.
18. Schelling TC. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 143-186.
19. South SJ, Crowder K, Chavez E. 2005. Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: classical versus segmented trajectories. Demography 42: 497-521.
20. Spilimbergo A, Ubeda L. 2004. Family attachment and the decision to move by race. Journal of Urban Economics 55: 478-497.
21. Teune W, Jeurissen I, Dignum K, Vermazen I. 2006. Wonen in Amsterdam. Amsterdamse Ferderatie van Woningcorparaties. Available at: www.wonen.amsterdam.nl.
22. Weesie J. 1999. Seemingly unrelated estimation and cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator. Stata Technical Bulletin 52: 34-47.
23. Zorlu A. 2007. Struggling for a proper job. New immigrants in the Netherlands. AIAS Working Paper 64. Available at http://www.uva-aias.net/publications/show/1024/
24. Zorlu A, Mulder CH. 2008. Initial and subsequent location choices of immigrants to the Netherlands. Regional Studies 42: 245-264.