The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1329-1332

  Dolan, Mike ^a   Rowley, Jack ^b  

^a Mobile Operators Association   (United Kingdom)

^b GSM Association   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic fields; Precautionary approach; Precautionary principle; Public concern; Scientific uncertainty; Technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH HAZARD; MOBILE PHONE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; RADIATION SAFETY; RADIOFREQUENCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION; UNITED KINGDOM; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION;

AUSTRALIA; CELLULAR PHONE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GREAT BRITAIN; RADIO WAVES;

EID: 69949099114     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900727     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ACRBR (Australian Centre for Radiofrequency Bioeffects Research). 2008. The ACRBR Perspective on the BioInitiative Report. Available: http://www.acrbr.org.au/FAQ.aspx [accessed 24 April 2009].
2. Australian Communications Industry Forum. 2004. Deployment of Mobile Phone Network Infrastructure. ACIF C564. Sydney:Australian Communications Industry Forum.
3. Barnett J, Timotijevic L, Shepherd R, Senior V. 2007. Public responses to precautionary information from the Department of Health (UK) about possible health risks from mobile phones. Health Policy 82(2):240-250.
4. BioInitiative Working Group. 2007. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). Available: http://www.bioinitiative.org/ [accessed 15 July 2009].
5. Burgess A. 2002. A precautionary tale: the British response to cell phone EMF. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 21(4):14-18.
6. Chapman S, Schofield WN. 1998. Lifesavers and samaritans: emergency use of cellular (mobile) phones in Australia. Accid Anal Prev 30(6):815-819.
7. Christ A, Chavannes N, Nikoloski N, Gerber H-U, Poković K, Kuster N. 2005. A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment. Bioelectromagnetics 26(2):125-137.
8. COMEST (World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology). 2005. The Precautionary Principle. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf [accessed 19 November 2008].
9. Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Communication on the Precautionary Principle, Brussels, 2 February 2000. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=CELEX:52000DC0001:EN:HTML [accessed 19 November 2008].
10. Daemen TJ. 2003. The European Community's evolving precautionary principle - comparisons with the United States and ramifications for Doha Round Trade negotiations. Eur Energy Environ Law Rev 12(1):6-19.
11. EMF-NET. 2007. Comments on the BioInitiative Working Group Report (BioInitiative Report), 30 October 2007. Available: http://web.jrc.ec.europa.eu/emf-net/doc/EFRTDocuments/ EMF-NET%20Comments%20on%20the%20BioInitiative%20Report%2030OCT2007.pdf [accessed 24 April 2009].
12. Hardell L, Sage C. 2008. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmacother 62(2):104-109.
13. Health Council of the Netherlands. 2008. BioInitiative Report. Publication 2008/17E. The Hague:Health Council of the Netherlands.
14. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. 2001. Section III of Mobile Phone Masts. Tenth Report. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200001/cmselect/cmtrdind/330/ 33002.htm [accessed 27 January 2009].
15. Hrudey SE, Leiss W. 2003. Risk management and precaution: insights on the cautious use of evidence. Environ Health Perspect 111:1577-1581.
16. IEGMP (Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones). 2000. Mobile Phones and Health. Available: http://www.iegmp.org.uk/report/text.htm [accessed 19 November 2008].
17. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 1998. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 74(4):494-522.
18. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 2009. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz): Review of the Scientific Evidence and Health Consequences. Munich, Germany:International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Available: http://www.icnirp.org/documents/RFReview.pdf [accessed 15 July 2009].
19. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2008. ICNIRP statement on EMF-emitting new technologies. Health Phys 94(4):376-392.
20. Manson NA. 2002. Formulating the precautionary principle. Environ Ethics 24(3):263-274.
21. Mobile Manufacturers Forum. 2008. SAR Information. Available: http://www.mmfai.org/public/sar.cfm?lang=eng [accessed 19 November 2008].
22. Mobile Operators Association. 2004. Risk Communication Handbook - Working with the Community. Available: http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/ planning/handbook.htm [accessed 19 November 2008].
23. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). 2004. Mobile Phones and Health: 2004: Report by the Board of NRPB. Documents of the NRPB, Vol 15, No 5. Available: http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/ HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733821582 [accessed 19 November 2008].
24. Neubauer G, Feychting M, Hamnerius Y, Kheifets L, Kuster N, Ruiz I, et al. 2007. Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations. Bioelectromagnetics 28(3):224-230.
25. Optus v. CC Kensington and Norwood & Frost. 1998. No. ERD-97-344 Judgement No. OE480. Environmental Resources and Development Court of South Australia, 29 May 1998.
26. Petrie KJ, Sivertsen B, Hysing M, Broadbent E, Moss-Morris R, Eriksen HR, et al. 2001. Thoroughly modern worries: the relationship of worries about modernity to reported symptoms, health and medical care utilization. J Psychosom Res 51(1):395-401.
27. Rowley J. 2007. Wireless networks - regulatory good practice. In: Base Stations and Wireless Networks: Exposures and Health Consequences. Geneva:World Health Organization, 145-156. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2007/9789241595612_eng.pdf [accessed 19 February 2009].
28. Sahl J, Dolan M. 1996. An evaluation of precaution-based approaches as EMF policy tools in community environments. Environ Health Perspect 104:908-911.
29. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2009. Health Effects of Exposure to EMF. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/ health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_022.pdf [accessed 18 February 2009].
30. Shirley Primary School v. Telecom Mobile Communications Limited and Christchurch City Council. 1998. Decision No. C 136/98, New Zealand Environment Court, 4-8. 11-15 May 1998 and 29 June 1998.
31. Sienkiewicz ZJ, Kowalczuk CI. 2005. A Summary of Recent Reports on Mobile Phones and Health (2000-2004). W65. Didcot, Oxon, UK:National Radiological Protection Board.
32. Stokes E. 2008. The EC courts contribution to refining the parameters of precaution. J Risk Res 11(4):491-507.
33. Telstra Corporation Limited v. Hornsby Shire Council. 2006. NSWLEC 133. Available: http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lecjudgments/2006nswlec.nsf/ c45212a2bef99be4ca256736001f37bd/fdf89ace6e00928bca25713800832056?Open Document [accessed 19 November 2008].
34. T Mobile and others v. First Secretary of State and Harrogate Borough Council. 2004. EWCA Civ 1763.
35. Treaty on European Union. 1992. Title XVI: Environment, Article 130r(2), Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
36. Valberg PA, van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH. 2007. Base stations and wireless networks - radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences. Environ Health Perspect 115:416-424.
37. Vecchia P. 2007. Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations. Ann Ist Super Sanità 43(3):260-267.
38. WHO (World Health Organization). 2000. Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Mobile Phones and Their Base Stations. Fact Sheet No. 193. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/ [accessed 19 November 2008].
39. WHO (World Health Organization). 2002. Establishing a Dialogue on Risks from Electromagnetic Fields. Available: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/ publications/risk_hand/en/index.html [accessed 19 November 2008].
40. Wiedemann PM, Schütz H. 2005. The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area. Environ Health Perspect 113:402-405.
41. Wiedemann PM, Schütz H. 2008. Informing the public about information and participation strategies in the siting of mobile communication base stations: an experimental study. Health Risk Soc 10(6):517-534