Impact of generators' behaviors on Nash equilibrium considering transmission constraints

European Transactions on Electrical Power

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 765-777

  Badri, A ^a   Jadid, S ^a   Moghaddam, M P ^b   Rashidinejad, M ^c  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c SHAHID BAHONAR UNIVERSITY OF KERMAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Bidding strategy; Market power; Nash equilibrium; Oligopoly market; Transmission constraints

Indexed keywords

BIDDING STRATEGY; MARKET POWER; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; OLIGOPOLY MARKET; TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS;

ACOUSTIC GENERATORS; COMPETITION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; OPTIMIZATION; POWER ELECTRONICS;

COMMERCE;

EID: 69949097526     PISSN: 1430144X     EISSN: 15463109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etep.254     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Romp G. Game theory-introduction and applications. Oxford university press: Oxford 1997.
2. Owen G. Game theory-third edition. Academic press: New York 1995.
3. Wen FS, David AK. Oligopoly electricity market production under incomplete information. IEEE Power Eng. Rev. 2001; 21:58-61.
4. Ferrero R, Rivera J, Shahidehpour M. Applications of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1998; 13:184-189.
5. Li T, Shahidehpour M. Strategic bidding of transmission-constrained GENCOs with incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2005; 20:437-447.
6. Gountis VP, Bakirtzis AG. Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity market place. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2004; 19:356-365.
7. Ferrero R, Shahidehpour M, Ramesh V. Transaction analysis in deregulated power systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1997; 12:1340-1347.
8. Bai X, Shahidehpour M, Ramesh V, Yu E. Transmission analysis by Nash game method. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1997; 12:1046-1052.
9. Ma L, Wen F, Ni Y, Wu FF. Optimal bidding strategies for generation companies in electricity markets with transmission capacity constraints taken into account. Proceedings of IEEE/PES Summer Meeting, (vol. 2, pp. 2604-2610), July 2003.
10. Conejo AJ, Nogales FJ, Arroyo JM. Price taker bidding strategy under price uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2002; 17:1081-1088.
11. Zhang D, Wang Y, Luh PB. Optimization based bidding strategies in the deregulated market. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2000; 15:981-986.
12. Hong YY, Tsai SW, Weng MT. Bidding strategy based on artificial intelligence for a competitive electric market. IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2001; 148:159-163.
13. Wen FS, David AK. Optimally co-ordinated bidding strategies in energy and ancillary service markets. IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2002; 149:331-338.
14. Tang J, Lin J, Ding Q, Zheng Y. A new optimal bidding strategy in power market, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference & Exhibition: Asia and Pacific Dalian, China, 2005.
15. David AK, Wen FS. Strategic bidding in competitive electricity market: a literature survey, in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Power Eng. Conf., 2000; pp. 2168-2173.
16. Jabr RA. A primal-dual interior point method to solve the optimal power flow dispatching problem. Springer Opt. Eng. J. 2004; 4:309-336.
17. Deuflhard P. Newton methods for non-linear problems. Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 2004; 35.
18. Baldick R. Electricity market equilibrium models: the effect of parameterization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2002; 17:1170-1176.