A revised SAS macro for maximum likelihood estimation of prevalence ratios using the COPY method

Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 639-

  Petersen, Martin R ^a   Deddens, J A ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CALCULATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; PREVALENCE;

EID: 69949096599     PISSN: 13510711     EISSN: 14707926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.043018     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Deddens JA, Petersen MR, Lei X. Estimation of prevalence ratios when PROC GENMOD does not converge. Proceedings of the 28th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. March 30-April 2, 2003. http://www2.sas.com/ proceedings/sugi28/270-28.pdf (accessed 23 Jun 2008).
2. Petersen MR, Deddens JA. Letter to the editor: RE: easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:1157-1163
3. Petersen MR, Deddens JA. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:9. http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1471-2288/8/9 (accessed 23 Jun 2008).
4. MacDonald LA, Karasek RA, Punnett L, et al. Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention. Ergonomics 2001;44:696-718. (Pubitemid 32544652)
5. Deddens JA, Petersen MR. Letter to the editor: RE: estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:213-214