Influence of several tree traits on rainfall partitioning in temperate and boreal forests: A review

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 602-602

  Barbier, Stéphane ^a   Balandier, Philippe ^a,b   Gosselin, Frédéric ^a  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Interception; Stemflow; Throughfall; Tree traits; Water

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; DECIDUOUS TREE; EVERGREEN TREE; INTERCEPTION; PARTITIONING; RAINFALL; SOIL WATER; STEMFLOW; TEMPERATE FOREST; THROUGHFALL; TRANSPIRATION; WATER CONTENT; WATER FLOW;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 69949086102     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009041     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aboal J.R., Morales D., Hernández M., and Jiménez M.S., 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. J. Hydrol. 221: 161-175.
2. Abrahamsen G., Bjor K., Horntvedt R., and Tveite B., 1976. Effects of acid precipitation on coniferous forest. In: Braekke F.H. (Ed.), Impact of acid precipitation on forest and freshwater ecosystems in Norway: summary report on the research results from the phase 1 (1972-1975) of the SNSF project. SNSF project, Oslo, pp. 36-63.
3. Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., and Thompson W.L., 2000. Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J. Wildl. Manage. 64: 912-923.
4. Aussenac G., 1968. Interception des précipitations par le couvert forestier. Ann. Sci. For. 25: 135-156.
5. Aussenac G., 1970. Apercu du rôle de la forêdans l'économie d'eau. ev. For. Fr. 22: 603-618.
6. Aussenac G., 1981. L'interception des précipitations par les peuplements forestiers. La Houille Blanche 7/8: 531-536.
7. Aussenac G. and Boulangeat C., 1980. Interception des précipitations et évapotranspiration réelle dans des peuplements de feuillus (Fagus sylvatica L.) et de résineux. Ann. Sci. For. 37: 91-107.
8. Balandier P., Collet C., Miller J.H., Reynolds P.E., and Zedacker S.M., 2006a. Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation. Forestry 79: 3-27.
9. Balandier P., De Montard F.X., and Curt T., 2008. Root competition for water between trees and grass in a silvopastoral plot of ten-year- old Prunus avium. In: Batish D.R., Kohli R.K.., Jose S., and Singh H.P. (Eds), Ecological basis of agroforestry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 253-270.
10. Balandier P., Sonohat G., Sinoquet H., Varlet-Grancher C., and Dumas Y., 2006b. Characterisation, prediction and relationships between different wavebands of solar radiation transmitted in the understorey of even-aged oak (Quercus petraea, Q. robur) stands. Trees 20: 63-370.
11. Barbier S., Gosselin F., and Balandier P., 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved - a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 254: 1-15.
12. Bergkvist B. and Folkeson L., 1995. The influence of tree species on acid deposition proton budgets and element fluxes in south Swedish forest ecosystems. Ecol. Bull. 44: 90-99.
13. Bersier L.F. and Meyer D.R., 1994. Bird assemblages in mosaic forests: the relative importance of vegetation structure and floristic composition along the successional gradient. Acta Oecol. 15: 561-576.
14. Bladon K.D., Silins U., Landhäusser S.M., and Lieffers V.J., 2006. Differential transpiration by three boreal tree species in response to increased evaporative demand after variable retention harvesting. Agric. For. Meteorol. 138: 104-119.
15. Breda N., 1999. L'indice foliaire des couverts forestiers: mesure, variabil- ité et rôle fonctionnel. Rev. For. Fr. 51: 135-150.
16. Bréda N., Huc R., Granier A., and Dreyer E., 2006. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 625-644.
17. Breshears D.D., McDowell N.G., Goddard K.L., Dayem K.E., Martens S.N., Meyer C.W., and Brown K.M., 2008. Foliar absorption of intercepted rainfall improves woody plant water status most during drought. Ecology 89: 41-47.
18. Bultot F., Dupriez G., and Bodeux A., 1972. Interception de la pluie par la végétation forestière ; estimation de l'évaporation journalière à l'aide d'un modèle mathématique. J. Hydrol. 17: 193-223.
19. Burgess S.S.O. and Dawson T.E., 2004. The contribution of fog to the water relations of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don): foliar uptake and prevention of dehydration. Plant Cell Environ. 27: 1023-1034.
20. Burnham K.P. and Anderson D.R., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach, Springer- Verlag, New York, 488 p.
21. Canham D.C., Finzi A.C., Pacala S.W., and Burbank D.H., 1994. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 337-349.
22. Cape J.N., Brown A.H.F., Robertson S.M.C., Howson G., and Paterson I.S., 1991. Interspecies comparisons of throughfall and stemflow at three sites in northern Britain. For. Ecol. Manage. 46: 165-178.
23. Chang S.C. and Matzner E., 2000. Soil nitrogen turnover in proximal and distal stem areas of European beech trees. Plant Soil 218: 117-125.
24. Comerford N.B. and White E.H., 1977. Nutrient content of throughfall in Paper Birch and Red Pine stands in northern Minnesota. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 556-561.
25. Cosandey C. and Robison M., 2000. Hydrologie continentale, Armand Colin, Paris, 360 p.
26. Courchesne F. and Hendershot W.H., 1988. Apport en sulfate et en eau à la surface du sol sous quatre especes arborescentes. Naturaliste Canadien 115: 57-63.
27. Crozier C.R. and Boerner R.E.J., 1984. Correlations of understory herb distribution patterns with microhabitats under different tree species in a mixed mesophytic forest. Oecologia 62: 337-343.
28. Curt T. and Prévosto B., 2003. Rooting strategy of naturally regenerated beech in Silver birch and Scots pine woodlands. Plant Soil 255: 265-279. (Pubitemid 37399613)
29. eFloras, 2008. http://efloras.org
30. Eidmann F.E., 1959. Die Interception in Buchen- und Fichtenbestä nden; Ergebnis mehrjähriger Untersuchungen im Rothaargebirge (Sauerland). In: Symposium of Hannoversch-Münden. T. 1, Vol.1 Water and woodlands. International Union of Geodesy and Geophysic, Gentbrugge, pp. 5-25.
31. Ewers B.E., Mackay D.S., Gower S.T., A.D.E., Burrows S.N., and Samanta S.S., 2002. Tree species effects on stand transpiration in northern Wisconsin. Water Resour. Res. 38: 1-11.
32. Forgeard F., Gloaguen J.C., and Touffet J., 1980. Interception des précipitations et apports au sol d'éléments minéraux par les eaux de pluie et les pluviolessivats dans une hêtraie atlantique et dans quelques peu- plements résineux de Bretagne. Ann. Sci. For. 37: 53-71.
33. Freedman B. and Prager U., 1986. Ambient bulk deposition, throughfall, and stemflow in a variety of forest stands in Nova Scotia. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 854-860.
34. Gilliam, F.S., Turrill, N.L., and Adams, M.B., 1995. Herbaceous-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecol. Appl. 5: 947-955.
35. Gurevitch J. and Hedges L.V., 2001. Meta-analysis. Combining the results of independent experiments. In: Scheiner S.M. and Gurevitch J. (Eds.), Design and analysis of ecological experiments, Oxford University Press, New-York, pp. 347-369.
36. Harrell F.E., 2001. Regression modeling strategies, with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis, Springer, New York, USA, xxiii + 568 p.
37. Heinrichs H. and Mayer R., 1977. Distribution and cycling of major and trace elements in two Central European forest ecosystems. J. Environ. Qual. 6: 402-407.
38. Hélardot J., 2008. Arbres. http://jeanlouis.helardot.free.fr
39. Helliwell D.R., 1982. Options in forestry. A review of literature on the effects of different tree species and sylvicultural systems on the soil, flora, fauna, visual amenity, and timber production. Packard Publishing, Chichester, 60 p.
40. Helvey J.D., Hewlett J.D., and Douglass J.E., 1972. Predicting Soil Moisture in the Southern Appalachians. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proceed. 36: 954-959.
41. Houdijk A.L.F.M. and Roelofs J.G.M., 1991. Deposition of acidifying and eutrophicating substances in Dutch forests. Acta Bot. Neerl. 40: 245-255.
42. Howard L.F. and Lee T.D., 2003. Temporal patterns of vascular plant diversity in southeastern New Hampshire forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 185: 5-20.
43. Humbert J. and Najjar G., 1992. Influence de la forêt sur le cycle de l'eau en domaine tempéré - une analyse de la littérature francophone, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 85 p.
44. IPCC, 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Solomon S. et al., (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, pp. 1-18.
45. Keim R.F., Skaugset A.E., and Weiler M., 2006. Storage of water on vegetation under simulated rainfall of varying intensity. Adv. Water Resour. 29: 974-986.
46. Lacoste A. and Salanon R., 1991. Elements de biogeographie et d'écologie, Nathan, Paris, 189 p.
47. Larcher W., 1975. Physiological plant ecology, Springer, Berlin, 513 p.
48. Lebourgeois F. and Jabiol B., 2002. Enracinements comparés des chênes (sessile et pédonculé) et du hetre sur différents matériaux. Ref́lexions sur l'autécologie des essences. Rev. For. Fr. 54: 17-112
49. Levia D.F. and Frost E.E., 2003. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J. Hydrol. 274: 1-29.
50. Levia D.F. and Herwitz S.R., 2005. Interspecific variation of bark water storage capacity of three deciduous tree species in relation to stem- flow yield and solute flux to forest soils. Catena 64: 117-137.
51. Leyton L., Reynolds E.R., and Thompson F.B., 1967. Rainfall interception in forest and moorland. In: Sopper W.E. and Lull H.W. (Eds.), Forest hydrology, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 163-178.
52. Link T.E., Unsworth M., and Marks D., 2004. The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 124: 171-191.
53. Llorens P. and Domingo F., 2007. Rainfall partitioning by vegetation under Mediterranean conditions. A review of studies in Europe. J. Hydrol. 335: 37-54.
54. Mahendrappa M.K., 1990. Partitioning of rainwater and chemicals into throughfall and stemflow in different forest stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 30: 65-72.
55. Martin-Aranda J. and Coutts J.R.H., 1963. Micrometeorological observations in an afforested area in Aberdeenshire: rainfall characteristics. J. Soil Sci. 14: 124-133.
56. Mina V.N., 1965. Leaching of certain substances by precipitation from woody plants and its importance in the biological cycle. Soviet Soil Sci. 6: 609-617.
57. Nihlgard B., 1970a. Precipitation, its chemical composition and effect on soil water in a beech and a spruce forest in south Sweden. Oikos 21: 208-217.
58. Nihlgard B., 1970b. Vegetation types of planted Spruce forest in Scania, southern Sweden. Botaniska Notiser 123: 310-347.
59. Noirfalise A., 1959. Sur l'interception de la pluie par le couvert dans quelques forets belges. Bull. Soc. Roy. For. Belgique 10: 433-439.
60. Norden U., 1991. Acid deposition and throughfall fluxes of elements as related to tree species in deciduous forests of South Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut. 60: 209-230.
61. Olszewsky J.L., 1976. Relation between the amount of rainfall reaching the forest floor and the amount of rainfall over a mixed deciduous forest. Phytocoenosis 5: 127-156.
62. Onof C. and Wheater H.S., 1996. Analysis of the spatial coverage of British rainfall fields. J. Hydrol. 176: 97-113.
63. Otto H.J., 1998. Écologie forestière, Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Paris, 397 p.
64. Ovington J.D., 1954. A comparison of rainfall in different woodlands. Forestry 27: 41-53.
65. Packham J.R., Harding D., Hilton G., and Stuttard R., 1992. Functional ecology of woodlands and forests, Kluwer academic publishers, Dordrecht, 407 p.
66. Parker G.G., 1983. Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Adv. Ecol. Res. 13: 58-120.
67. Pataki D.E. and Oren R., 2003. Species differences in stomatal control of water loss at the canopy scale in a mature bottomland deciduous forest. Adv. Water Resour. 26: 1267-1278.
68. Petit F. and Kamutanda K., 1984. L'interception des pluies par différents types de couverts forestiers. Bull. Soc. Géogr. Liège 20: 99-127.
69. Puckett L.J., 1991. Spatial variability and collector requirements for sampling throughfall volume and chemistry under a mixed-hardwood canopy. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1581-1588.
70. Rameau J.C., Mansion D., Dumé G., Timbal J., Lecointe A., Dupont P., and Keller R., 1989. Flore forestière française. Guide écologique il- lustré. Tome 1: Plaines et collines, Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Paris, 1785 p.
71. Robertson S.M., Hornung M., and Kennedy V.H., 2000. Water chemistry of throughfall and soil water under four tree species at Gisburn, northwest England, before and after felling. For. Ecol. Manage. 129: 101-117.
72. Robins P.C., 1974. A method of measuring the aerodynamic resistance to the transport ofwater vapour from forest canopies. J. Appl. Ecol. 11: 315-325.
73. Ross M., Flanagan L., and La Roi G., 1986. Seasonal and successional changes in light quality and quantity in the understory of boreal forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 64: 2792-2799.
74. Schmid C.H. and Brown E.N., 2000. Bayesian hierarchical models. Methods Enzymol. 321: 305-330.
75. Schnock G. and Galoux A., 1967. Recherches sur l'écosystème forêt. Contribution No. 8: Réception des précipitations et écoulement le long des troncs en 1966. Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belg. 43: 1-30.
76. Toba T. and Ohta T., 2005. An observational study of the factors that influence interception loss in boreal and temperate forests. J. Hydrol. 313: 208-220.
77. Vannitsem S. and Naveau P., 2007. Spatial dependences among precipitation maxima over Belgium. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 14: 621-630.
78. Verry F.S. and Timmons D.R., 1977. Precipitation nutrients in the open and under two forests in Minnesota. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 112-119.
79. Voigt G.K., 1960. Distribution of rainfall under forest stands. For. Sci. 6: 2-10.
80. Waisel Y., 1960. Fog precipitation by trees. La-Yaaran 9: 3.
81. Wei X., Liu S., Zhou G., and Wang C., 2005. Hydrological processes in major types of Chinese forest. Hydrol. Process. 19: 63-75.
82. Wells C.A., Whigham D., and Lieth H., 1972. Investigations of mineral cycling in an upland Piedmont forest. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 88: 66-78.
83. Wittig R. and Neite H., 1985. Acid indicators around the trunk base of Fagus sylvatica in limestone and loess beechwoods: distribution pattern and phytosociological problems. Vegetatio 64: 113-119.