Execution management in the GRID, for sensitivity studies of global climate simulations

Earth Science Informatics

Volumn 2, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 75-82

  Fernandez Quiruelas V ^a   Fernandez J ^a   Baeza, C ^b   Cofino A S ^a   Gutierrez J M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^c INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA DE CANTABRIA CSIC UC   (Spain)

Author keywords

CAM model; Climate models; El Ni o phenomenon; GRID computing; Workflow management

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC FORCING; CLIMATE MODELING; DATA MANAGEMENT; EL NINO; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; STORAGE;

EID: 69949085120     PISSN: 18650473     EISSN: 18650481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-008-0018-z     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Allen M (1999) Do it yourself climate prediction. Nature 401:642
2. Burke S, Campana S, Delgado Peris A, Donno F, Méndez Lorenzo P, Santinelli R, Sciabà A (2007) gLite 3.0 users guide. https://edms.cern.ch/file/722398/1.1/gLite-3-UserGuide.pdf
3. Collins WD, Rasch PJ et al (2004) Description of the NCAR Comunity Atmospheric Model (CAM 3.0). Technical Report NCAR/TN-464+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research. http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/docs/description/description.pdf
4. Foster I, Kesselman C (1999) The grid. Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure. Kaufmann, San Francisco
5. Hagedorn R, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Palmer T (2005) The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting-I. Basic concept. Tellus A 57:219-233
6. Koblitz B, Santos N, Pose V (2007) The AMGA metadata service. J Grid Comput 6:61-76
7. Palmer TN (2002) The economic value of ensemble forecasts as a tool for risk assessment: from days to decades. Quart J Royal Meteor Soc 128:747-774