Approaches to participation in evaluation: Some conditions for implementation;Démarches d'évaluation participative: Vertus pour la gouvernance publique, contraintes pour la mise en oeuvre

Evaluation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 343-359

  Plottu, Béatrice ^a   Plottu, Eric ^b  

^a AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^b National Agency for the Environment and Energy Management   (France)

Author keywords

Approaches to participation in evaluation; Democracy; Empowerment; Participation; Public policies

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849100839     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389009106357     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Canadian International Development Agency (n.d.) Participatory Appraisal Techniques, URL (consulted Jan. 2009): http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/CIDAWEB/acdicida.nsf/prnEn/EMA-218123623-NP9
3. Cousins, J. B. and L. Earl (1992) The Case for Participatory Evaluation, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(4): 397-418.
4. Cousins, J. B. and E. Whitmore (1998) Framing Participatory Evaluation, New Directions for Evaluation 80: 5-23.
5. Eckley, N. (2001) Designing Effective Assessments: The Role of Participation, Science and Governance, and Focus, report of a workshop co-organized by the European Environment Agency and the Global Environmental Assessment Project, Copenhagen, 1-3 March. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency Environmental issue report 26.
6. Estrella, M. and Gaventa, J. (1998). Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. Institute for Development Studies Working Paper 70, University of Sussex.
7. Fetterman, D. M. (2001) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8. Fetterman, D. M. and A. Wandersman (2005) Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York: Guilford Publications.
9. Fetterman, D. M. and A. Wandersman (2007) Empowerment Evaluation: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, American Journal of Evaluation 28(2): 179-98.
10. Fetterman, D. M., S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) (1996) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11. Floc'hlay, B. and E. Plottu (1998) Democratic Evaluation: From Empowerment Evaluation to Public Decision-Making, Evaluation 4(3): 261-77.
12. Greene, J. C. (2002) Towards Evaluation as a Public Craft and Evaluator as Stewards of the Public Good or on Listening Well, presentation at the 2002 Australian Evaluation Society International Conference, Oct./Nov.
13. Hanberger, A. (2006) Evaluation of and for Democracy, Evaluation 12(1): 17-37.
14. House, E. R. (2005) Promising Practices: The Many Forms of Democratic Evaluation, The Evaluation Exchange (The Harvard Family Research Project's evaluation periodical, Cambridge, MA) 11(3): 7.
15. Lehtonen, M. (2006). Deliberative Democracy, Participation and OECD Peer Reviews of Environmental Policies, American Journal of Evaluation 27(2): 185-200.
16. Miller, R. L. and R. Campbell (2006) Taking Stock of Empowerment Evaluation, American Journal of Evaluation 27(3): 296-319.
17. Nabasa, J., G. Rutwara, F. Walker and C. Were (1995) Participatory Rural Appraisal: Practical Experiences. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute.
18. Patton, M. Q. (1997) Utilisation-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. London: SAGE.
19. Plottu, E. (1999) 'Environnement: principe et méthodologie de l'evaluation hiérarchique. Un cadre pour le développement durable et l'analyse de projets, doctoral thesis. Université de Rennes 1, 5 Jan.
20. Plottu, E. and B. Plottu (2007) The Concept of Total Economic Value of Environment: A Reconsideration within a Hierarchical Rationality, Ecological Economics 61: 52-61.
21. Pollitt, C. (1999) Stunted by Stakeholders? Limits to Collaborative Evaluation, Public Policy and Administration 14(2): 77-90.
22. Roy, B. (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Roy, B. (1999) Decision-Aiding Today: What should we Expect?, in T. Gal, T. Stewart and T. Hanne (eds) Advances in Multicriteria Decision Making: MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Rutherford, F. P. (2000) Strengthening Citizen Participation in Evaluating Community Development: The Case of the EZ/EC Learning Initiative in Mc Dowell County, West Virginia, in M. Estrella et al. (eds) Learning from Change: Issues and Experiences in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, pp. 124-36. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
25. Tandon, R. and W. Fernandes (1984) Participatory Evaluation: Theory and Practice. New Delhi: Indian Institute for Social Research.
26. Viveret, P. (1989) L'évaluation des politiques et des actions publiques: propositions en vue de l'évaluation du revenu minimum d'insertion. Rapport au premier ministre. Paris: La Documentation française.
27. Warren, M. E. (1993) Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimensions of Habermas's Discursive Model of Democracy, Political Psychology 14(2): 209-34.