Hip arthroplasty. Part 1: prosthesis terminology and classification

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 954-960

  Pluot, E ^a   Davis, E T ^a   Revell, M ^a   Davies, A M ^a   James, S L J ^a  

^a ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ACETABULOPLASTY; ARTHROPLASTY; BIPOLAR ARTHROPLASTY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RESURFACING; HOSPITAL SERVICE; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; ORTHOPEDICS; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNIPOLAR ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; GREAT BRITAIN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RADIOLOGY; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 69849091813     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.03.011     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. National Joint Registry. 4th Annual report (2007), NJR Centre, Northgate Information Solutions, Hemel Hempstead
2. Hardy D.C., Reinus W.R., Totty W.G., et al. Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: utility of postambulation radiographs. Skeletal Radiol 17 (1988) 20-23
3. Keogh C.F., Munk P.L., Gee R., et al. Imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003) 115-120
4. Leung S., Naudie D., Kitamura N., et al. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 592-597
5. Puri L., Wixson R.L., Stern S.H., et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A (2002) 609-614
6. Stumpe K.D., Notzli H.P., Zanetti M., et al. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 231 (2004) 333-341
7. Sugimoto H., Hirose I., Miyaoka E., et al. Low-field-strength MR imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings. Radiology 229 (2003) 718-723
8. Walde T.A., Weiland D.E., Leung S.B., et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2005) 138-144
9. Bauer T.W., and Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty 1. Mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol 28 (1999) 423-432
10. Huiskes R., Verdonschot N., and Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 103-112