Agency discretion and public health service delivery

Health Services Research

Volumn 44, Issue 5 PART 2, 2009, Pages 1897-1908

  McCann, Pamela J Clouser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Discretion; Implementation; Policy; Screening; Service delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE;

EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEONATAL SCREENING; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 69849086330     PISSN: 00179124     EISSN: 14756773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01010.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Botkin, J. R., E. W. Clayton, N. C. Fost, T. H. Murray, M. A. Baily, B. Wilfond, A. Berg L. F. Ross. 2006 Newborn Screening Technology: Proceed with Caution Pediatrics 117 (5) : 1793 1799.
2. Frazier, D. M., D. Millington, S. McCandless, D. Koeberl, S. Weavil, S. Chaing J. Muenzer. 2006 The Tandem Mass Spectrometry Newborn Screening Experience in North Carolina: 1997-2005 Journal of Inherited Metabolic Diseases 29 (1) : 76 85.
3. Gostin, L. O. 2000. Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint. Berkeley : University of California Press.
4. Huber, J. D. C. R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press.
5. Kerwin, C. M. 2003. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. 3rd Edition. Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly Press.
6. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Mitka, M. 2000 Neonatal Screening Varies by State of Birth Journal of the American Medical Association 284 (16) : 2044 2046.
8. National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center. 1990-2006. "National Newborn Screening Information System." Genetic Services Branch and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio [accessed regularly from February 1, 2004, through August 21, 2008]. Available at http://www.genes-rus-uthscsa.edu/ with earlier years available from NNSGRC as hardcopy manuals.
9. Shumavon, D. H. H. K. Hibbeln. 1986. Administrative Discretion and Public Policy Implementation. New York : Praeger Publishers.
10. StataCorp. 2007. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10.0. College Station, TX : StataCorp LP.
11. Tarini, B. A. 2007 The Current Revolution in Newborn Screening: New Technology, Old Controversies Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 161 (8) : 767 772.
12. Tarini, B. A., D. A. Christakis H. G. Welch. 2006 State Newborn Screening in the Tandem Mass Spectrometry Era: More False-Positive Results Pediatrics 118 (2) : 448 456.
13. Therrell, B. L., et al. 2006 Status of Newborn Screening Programs in the United States Pediatrics 117 : S212 52.
14. Turnock, B. J. 2004. Public Health: What It Is and How It Works. 3rd Edition. Boston : Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
15. Vaughn, J. E. Otenyo. 2006. Managerial Discretion in Government Decision Making: Beyond the Street Level. Sudbury, MA : Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
16. Wing, K. R. 2003. The Law and The Public's Health. 6th Edition. Chicago : Health Administration Press.