Admissible invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression

Econometric Theory

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 806-818

  Chernozhukov, Victor ^a   Hansen, Christian ^b   Jansson, Michael ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849083065     PISSN: 02664666     EISSN: 14694360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266466608090312     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, T.W. & H. Rubin (1949) Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete set of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20, 46-63.
2. Andrews, D.W.K. (1996) Admissibility of the likelihood ratio test when the parameter space is restricted under the alternative. Econometrica 64, 705-718.
3. Andrews, D.W.K., M.J. Moreira, & J.H. Stock (2004) Optimal Invariant Similar Tests for Instrumental Variables Regression. NBER Technical Working Paper 299.
4. Andrews, D.W.K. & W. Ploberger (1995) Admissibility of the likelihood ratio test when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Annals of Statistics 23, 1609-1629.
5. Andrews, D.W.K. & J.H. Stock (2007) Inference with weak instruments. In R. Blundell,W.K. Newey, & T. Persson (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, vol.III, pp. 122-173. Cambridge University Press.
6. Chamberlain, G. (2007) Decision theory applied to an instrumental variables model. Econometrica 75, 609-652.
7. Dufour, J.-M. (1997) Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models. Econometrica 65, 1365-1387.
8. Dufour, J.-M. (2003) Identification, weak instruments, and statistical inference in econometrics. Canadian Journal of Economics 36, 767-808.
9. Ferguson, T.S. (1967) Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach. Academic Press.
10. Hahn, J. & J. Hausman (2003) Weak instruments: Diagnosis and cures in empirical econometrics. American Economic Review 93, 118-125.
11. Kleibergen, F. (2002) Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression. Econometrica 70, 1781-1803.
12. Lehmann, E.L. & J.P. Romano (2005) Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag.
13. Moreira, M.J. (2001) Tests with Correct Size When Instruments Can Be ArbitrarilyWeak. CLEWorking paper 37, University of California Berkeley.
14. Moreira, M.J. (2003) A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica 71, 1027-1048.
15. Muirhead, R.J. (1982) Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley.
16. Staiger, D. & J.H. Stock (1997) Instrumental variables estimation with weak instruments. Econometrica 65, 557-586.
17. Stock, J.H., J.H. Wright, & M. Yogo (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20, 518-529.