A fair method for centralized optimization of multi-TSO power systems

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 482-488

  Phulpin, Yannick ^a   Begovic, Miroslav ^b   Petit, Marc ^a   Ernst, Damien ^c  

^a SUPELEC   (France)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Centralized control; Fairness; Multi area power system; Multi objective optimization; Multi party optimization

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZED CONTROL; CENTRALIZED OPTIMIZATION; CONTROL AREA; CONTROL VARIABLE; ENTIRE SYSTEM; FAIRNESS; IEEE 118-BUS SYSTEM; INTERCONNECTED POWER SYSTEMS; MULTI-AREA POWER SYSTEM; MULTI-PARTY OPTIMIZATION; OBJECTIVE METHODS; OPTIMAL REACTIVE POWER DISPATCH; OPTIMIZATION FUNCTION; POWER SYSTEMS; TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATORS;

ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; REACTIVE POWER;

POWER TRANSMISSION;

EID: 69749124835     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bialek J.W. Are blackouts contagious. IEE Power Eng 17 6 (2003) 10-13
2. Final report - system disturbance on 4 November 2006. In: UCTE; January 2007.
3. Day L.R. Control area trends: principles and responses. IEEE Comp Appl Power 8 2 (1995) 34-39
4. Fardanesh B. Future trends in power system control. IEEE Comp Appl Power 15 3 (2002) 24-31
5. Conejo A.J., and Aguado J.A. Multi-area coordinated decentralized DC optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13 4 (1998) 1272-1278
6. Phulpin Y, Begovic M, Petit M, Heyberger JB, Ernst D. Evaluation of network equivalents for voltage optimization in multi-area power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst; in press.
7. Aguado J.A., and Quintana V.H. Inter-utilities power-exchange coordination: a market-oriented approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16 3 (2001) 513-519
8. Rebours Y., Kirschen D., Trotignon M., and Rossignol S. A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services - part I: technical features. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 1 (2007) 350-357
9. Dubins L.E., and Spanier E.H. How to cut a cake fairly?. Amer Math Monthly 68 1 (1961) 1-17
10. Rubenstein-Montano B., and Malaga R. A weighted-sum genetic algorithm to support multiple-party multiple-objective negotiations. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6 (2002) 366-377
11. Gembicki F.W., and Haimes Y.Y. Approach to performance and sensitivity multiobjective optimization: the goal attainment method. IEEE Trans Automat Control 20 6 (1975) 769-771
12. Chen Y.L., and Liu C.C. Multiobjective VAR planning using the goal-attainment method. IEEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 141 3 (1994) 227-232
13. Hsiao Y.T., Chiang H.D., Liu C.C., and Chen Y.L. A computer package for optimal multi-objective VAR planning in large-scale power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9 2 (1994) 668-676
14. Zionts S., and Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple-criteria problem. Manage Sci 22 6 (1976) 652-663
15. Lim LH, Benbasat I. From negotiation to negotiation support systems: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the HICSS 1992; January 1992. p. 153-63.
16. Miguelez E., Echavarren Cerezo F., and Rodriguez L. On the assignment of voltage control ancillary service of generators in spain. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 1 (2007) 367-375
17. Janssens N. Tertiary and secondary voltage control for the Belgian HV system. In: Proceedings of the IEE colloquium on international practices in reactive power control; April 1993. p. 81-4.
18. Deeb N., and Shahidehpour S.M. Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5 2 (1990) 428-438
19. Venkatesh B., Sadasivam G., and Khan M.A. A new optimal reactive power scheduling method for loss minimization and voltage stability margin maximization using successive multi-objective fuzzy LP technique. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 2 (2000) 844-851
20. Wu H., Yu C.W., Xu N., and Lin X.J. An OPF based approach for assessing the minimal reactive power support for generators in deregulated power systems. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 30 1 (2008) 23-30
21. He R., Taylor G.A., and Song Y.H. Multi-objective optimal reactive power flow including voltage security and demand profile classification. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 30 5 (2008) 327-336
22. Das I., and Dennis J.E. Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim 8 3 (1998) 631-657
23. Quintana V.H., Torres G.L., and Medina-Palomo J. Interior-point methods and their applications to power systems: a classification of publications and software codes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 1 (2000) 170-176
24. Orfanogianni T, Bacher R. Increased OPF code development efficiency by integration of general purpose optimization and derivative computation tools. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international conference on power industry computer applications, PICA'99; May 1999. p. 123-9.
25. Capitanescu F., Glavic M., Ernst D., Wehenkel L., and Interior-point based algorithms for the solution of optimal power flow p. Electric Power Syst Res 77 5-6 (2007) 508-517
26. Dickinson D.L., and Tiefenthaler J. What is fair? Experimental evidence. South Econ J 69 2 (2002) 414-428
27. Feldman A., and Kirman A. Fairness and envy. Amer Econ Rev 64 (1974) 995-1005
28. Konow J. A positive theory of economic fairness. J Behav Organization 31 (1996) 13-35
29. Phulpin Y, Begovic M, Petit M, Ernst D. On the fairness of centralised decision-making strategies in multi-TSO power systems. In: Proceedings of the PSCC 2008; July 2008. p. 1-8.
30. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer Econ Rev 83 (1993) 1281-1302
31. Wang H., Murillo-Sanchez C.E., Zimmerman R.D., and Thomas R.J. On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 3 (2007) 1185-1193