What principlism misses

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 229-231

  Walker, Tom ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY;

DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS;

EID: 69749102940     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.027227     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
2. Gillon R. Ethics needs principles. J Med Ethics 2003;29:307-12.
3. Shweder R, Much N, Mahapatra M, et al. The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In: Brandt A, Rozin P, eds. Morality and health. New York: Routledge, 1997.
4. Haidt J, Joseph C. The moral mind: how five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S, eds. The innate mind, vol 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
5. Haidt J, Graham J. When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc Justice Res 2007;20:98-116.