Laparoscopy Assisted Versus Open Ileocystoplasty in Pigs

Journal of Urology

Volumn 182, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2009, Pages 1644-1649

  da Silva Lavoura Jr , Nivaldo ^a   D'Ancona, Carlos Arthuro Levi ^a   de Castro Neves, Francisco ^a   Borges, Gustavo M ^a   Silva, Daniel ^a  

^a Department of Urology Santa Casa   (Brazil)

Author keywords

ileum; laparoscopy; tissue adhesions; urinary bladder; urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER COMPLIANCE; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; ILEOCYSTOPLASTY; INCIDENCE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PERITONEUM ADHESION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WEIGHT GAIN;

ANIMALS; ILEUM; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; SWINE; URINARY BLADDER; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 69749094858     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rink R.C., and Adams M.C. Augmentation cystoplasty. In: Walsh P.C., Retik A.B., Vaughan Jr. E.D., et al. (Eds). Campbell's Urology. 7th ed. (1998), WB. Saunders, Philadelphia 3167
2. Siqueira Jr. T.M., Paterson R.F., Kuo R.L., et al. Laparoscopic ileocystoplasty and continent ileovesicostomy in a porcine model. J Urol 17 (2003) 301
3. Portis A.J., Elbahnasy A.M., Shalhav A.L., et al. Laparoscopic midsagittal hemycystectomy and replacement of bladder wall with intestinal submucosa and reimplantation of ureter into graft. J Endosc Urol 14 (2000) 203
4. Redman J.F., and Barthold J.S. Experience with ileal augmentation cystoplasty using a short Pfannesnstiel. J Urol 155 (1996) 1726
5. Gerber G.S., and Stockton B.R. Laparoscopy. J Endourol 19 (2005) 931
6. Lendvay T.S., Cowan C.A., Mitchell M.M., et al. Augmentation cystoplasty rates at children′s hospitals in the United States: a pediatric health information system database study. J Urol 176 (2006) 1716
7. Sweeney D.D., Smaldone M.C., and Docimo S.G. Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children. Nat Clin Pract Urol 4 (2007) 26
8. Lavoura Jr. N., D'Ancona C.A.L., Borges G.M., et al. Laparoscopic ileocystoplasty: an experimental study in pigs. J Endourol 21 (2007) 218
9. Yesildaglar N., Ordoñez J.L., Laermanz I., et al. The mouse as a model to study adhesion formation following endoscopic surgery: a preliminary report. Human Reprod 14 (1999) 55
10. Shimanuki T., Nishimura K., Montz F.G., et al. Localized prevention of postsurgical adhesion formation and reformation in oxidized regenerated cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res 22 (1987) 173
11. Meraney A.M., and Gill I.S. Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. J Urol 167 (2002) 1757
12. Passerotti C.C., Nguyen H., Lais A., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation: defining techniques and potential pitfalls. J Endosc Urol 22 (2008) 355
13. Hyun Y., Ellis M., and Johnson R.W. Effects of feeder type, space allowance, and mixing on the growth performance and feed pattern of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 76 (1998) 2771
14. Miyake H., Kawabata G., Gotoh A., et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators. Int J Urol 9 (2002) 329
15. Monson J.R., Darzi A., Carey P.D., et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 340 (1992) 831
16. Bessler M., Whelan R.L., Halverson A., et al. Controlled trial of laparoscopic-assisted vs open resection in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 10 (1996) 732
17. Ziprin P., Ridgway P.F., Peck D.H., et al. Laparoscopic-type environment enhances mesothelial cell fibrinolytic activity in vitro via a down-regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity. Surgery 134 (2003) 758
18. Borazzo E.C., Belmont M.F., Boffa D., et al. Effect of prosthetic material on adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model. Hernia 8 (2004) 108
19. diZerega G.S., and Campeau J.D. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 6 (2001) 547
20. Luciano D.E., Roy G., and Luciano A.A. Adhesion reformation after laparoscopically adhesiolysis: where, what type, and in whom they are most likely to recur. J Minin Inv Gynecol 15 (2008) 44
21. Tingstedt B., Isaksson K., and Andersson R. Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesion. Br J Surg 94 (2007) 743
22. Docimo S.G., and Peters C.A. Laparoscopic enterocystoplasty. In: Wein P.C., Kavoussi A.B., Novick Jr. E.D., et al. (Eds). Campbell′s Urology. 9th ed. (2007), Saunders-Elsevier, Philadelphia 3925-3926