On reliability and security of randomized detectors against sensitivity analysis attacks

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 273-283

  El Choubassi, Maha ^a   Moulin, Pierre ^b  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Chernoff bounds; Detection security; Error exponents; Generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD); Maximum likelihood (ML); Randomization; Security; Sensitivity attacks; Spread spectrum; Watermarking

Indexed keywords

CHERNOFF BOUNDS; DETECTION SECURITY; ERROR EXPONENTS; GENERALIZED GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION (GGD); MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (ML); RANDOMIZATION; SECURITY; SENSITIVITY ATTACKS; SPREAD SPECTRUM;

ERROR DETECTION; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; WATERMARKING;

DETECTORS;

EID: 69749094234     PISSN: 15566013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2009.2021783     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. I. J. Cox and J. P. M. G. Linnartz, "Public watermarks and resistance to tampering," in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), Santa Barbara, CA, 1997, [CD-ROM].
2. J. P. Linnartz and M. van Dijk, "Analysis of the sensitivity attack against electronic watermarks in images," in Proc. Workshop of Information Hiding, Portland, OR, Apr. 1998, pp. 258-272.
3. T. Kalker, J. P. Linnartz, and M. van Dijk, "Watermark estimation through detector analysis," in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), Chicago, IL, Oct. 1998, vol.1, pp. 425-429.
4. A. Tewfik and M. Mansour, "LMS-based attack on watermark public detectors," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), Rochester, NY, Sep. 2002, pp. 649-652.
5. P. Comesãna, L. Pérez-Freire, and F. Pérez- Gonzaléz, "The return of the sensitivity attack," in Proc. IWDW, Siena, Italy, 2005, pp. 260-274.
6. M. El Choubassi and P. Moulin, "A new sensitivity analysis attack," in Proc. SPIE Conf., San Jose, CA, Jan. 2005, pp. 734-745.
7. M. El Choubassi and P. Moulin, "Noniterative algorithms for sensitivity analysis attacks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol.2, no.2, pp. 113-126, Jun. 2007.
8. R. Venkatesan and M. H. Jakubowski, "Randomized detection for spread-spectrum watermarking: Defending against sensitivity and other attacks," in Proc. ICASSP, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
9. I. J. Cox, M. L. Miller, and J. A. Bloom, Digital Watermarking. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
10. M. El Choubassi and P. Moulin, "On the fundamental tradeoff between watermark detection performance and robustness against sensitivity analysis attacks," Proc. SPIE, pp. 575-586, 2006.
11. M. El Choubassi and P. Moulin, "Sensitivity analysis attacks against randomized detectors," in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), San Antonio, TX, 2007.
12. P. Moulin and R. Koetter, "Data-hiding codes (tutorial)," Proc. IEEE, vol.93, no.12, pp. 2083-2127, Dec. 2005.
13. H. V. Poor, An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
14. D. Kazakos, "Signal detection under mismatch," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol.IT-28, no.4, pp. 681-684, Jul. 1982.
15. F. Müller, "Distribution shape of two-dimensional DCT coefficients of natural images," Electron. Lett., vol.29, no.22, pp. 1935-1936, Oct. 1993.
16. J. R. Hernández, M. Amado, and F. Pérez-González, "DCT-domain watermarking techniques for still images: Detector performance analysis and a new structure," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol.9, no.1, pp. 55-68, Jan. 2000.
17. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: Wiley, 1966.
18. A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni, Large Deviations Techniques and Applications. New York: Springer, 1998.