Molecular state reconstruction by nonlinear wave packet interferometry

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2004, Pages

  Humble, Travis S ^a   Cina, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR STATES; NONLINEAR WAVES; QUANTUM STATE HOLOGRAPHY (QSH); WAVE PACKET INTERFEROMETRY (WPI);

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COLOR; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LIGHT POLARIZATION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; POTENTIAL ENERGY; QUANTUM THEORY; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

NONLINEAR OPTICS;

EID: 69649108609     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.060402     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. S. A. Rice and M. Zhao, Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics (Wiley, New York, 2000).
2. T. Brixner, N. H. Damrauer, P. Niklaus, and G. Gerber, Nature (London) 414, 57 (2001).
3. J. L. Herek, W. Wohlleben, R. J. Cogdell, D. Zeidler, and M. Motzkus, Nature (London) 417, 533 (2002).
4. R. J. Levis, G. M. Menkir, and H. Rabitz, Science 292, 709 (2001).
5. T. J. Dunn, I. A. Walmsley, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 884 (1995).
6. E. Skovsen, H. Stapelfeldt, S. Juhl, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090406 (2003).
7. C. Leichtle, W. P. Schleich, I. Sh. Averbukh, and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1418 (1998); I. Sh. Averbukh, M. Shapiro, C. Leichtle, and W. P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2163 (1999).
8. C. Leichtle, W. P. Schleich, I. Sh. Averbukh, and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1418 (1998); I. Sh. Averbukh, M. Shapiro, C. Leichtle, and W. P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2163 (1999).
9. T. Weinacht, J. Ahn, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Nature (London) 397, 233 (1999).
10. J. A. Cina, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9488 (2000).
11. N. F. Scherer, R. Carlson, A. Matro, M. Du, A. J. Ruggiero, V. Romero-Rochin, J. A. Cina, G. R. Fleming, and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1487 (1991); N. F. Scherer, A. Matro, R. J. Carlson, M. Du, L. D. Ziegler, J. A. Cina, and G. R. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 4180 (1992).
12. N. F. Scherer, R. Carlson, A. Matro, M. Du, A. J. Ruggiero, V. Romero-Rochin, J. A. Cina, G. R. Fleming, and S. A. Rice, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1487 (1991); N. F. Scherer, A. Matro, R. J. Carlson, M. Du, L. D. Ziegler, J. A. Cina, and G. R. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 4180 (1992).
13. K. Ohmori, Y. Sato, E. E. Nikitin, and S. A. Rice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243003 (2003).
14. M. Cho, N. F. Scherer, G. Fleming, and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 5618 (1992).
15. W. P. de Boeij, M. S. Pshenichnikov, and D. A. Wiersma, Chem. Phys. 233, 287 (1998).
16. J. D. Hybl, A. Albrecht Ferro, and D. M. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6606 (2001).
17. f←e makes bi-linear terms negligible.
18. P. Tian, D. Keusters, Y. Suzkai, and W. S. Warren, Science 300, 1553 (2003).
19. n〉.
20. -1, which replaces the inverse of those singular values below some fractional cutoff (the tolerance T) with zero. See L. N. Trefethen and D. Bau, Numerical Linear Algebra (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997).
21. None of the specific features of this generic model are essential for successful state reconstruction.
22. f + D.
23. C. Leforestier et al., J. Comput Phys. 94, 59 (1991). We used a 0.05 fs time step and a 128-point position grid from -0.5 to 1.5 Å.
24. T. S. Humble and J. A. Cina, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 24, 1111 (2003) found unit fidelity in a noise-free one-color reconstruction. See also S. Ramos-Sánchez and V. Romero-Rochín, J. Chem. Phys. (to be published)
25. T. S. Humble and J. A. Cina, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 24, 1111 (2003) found unit fidelity in a noise-free one-color reconstruction. See also S. Ramos-Sánchez and V. Romero-Rochín, J. Chem. Phys. (to be published)
26. f.
27. γ〉 with row index l.
28. N. Dickson, T. S. Humble, and J. A. Cina (unpublished).