Statistical distribution of the fatigue strength of porous bone cement

Biomaterials

Volumn 30, Issue 31, 2009, Pages 6309-6317

  Hoey, David A ^a   Taylor, David ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Critical distance; Fatigue; Porosity; Probability; Scatter

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC BONE CEMENTS; BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; CONSTANT POROSITIES; CRITICAL DISTANCE; DAMAGING EFFECTS; FAILURE MODEL; FATIGUE; FATIGUE LIFE; FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION; FATIGUE STRENGTH; NEGATIVE CORRELATION; ORDER OF MAGNITUDE; ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS; POROSITY LEVEL; SCATTER; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; THEORY OF CRITICAL DISTANCES; VIRTUAL DATA; VIRTUAL MODELS;

BONE; CEMENTS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; POLYACRYLONITRILES; PORE SIZE; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; WELDS;

BONE CEMENT;

ACRYLIC CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FATIGUE; IMPLANT; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POROSITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STRENGTH;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POROSITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 69649105110     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.053     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Garellick G, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish hip arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2007.
2. Topoleski T.L.D., Ducheyne P., and Cuckler J.M. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 24 (1990) 135-154
3. James S.P., Jasty M., Davies J., Piehler H., and Harris W.H. A fractographic investigation of PMMA bone cement focusing on the relationship between porosity reduction and increased fatigue life. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 26 (1992) 651-662
4. Culleton T.P., Prendergast P.J., and Taylor D. Fatigue failure in the cement mantle of an artificial hip joint. Clinical Materials 12 (1993) 95-102
5. Lewis G. Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone cement materials: state of the art review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 66B (2002) 457-486
6. Jacobs J.J., Roebuck K.A., Archibeck M., Hallab N.J., and Glant T.T. Osteolysis: basic science. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 393 (2001) 71-77
7. Burns A.W.R., and Bourne R.B. Economics of revision total hip arthroplasty. Current Orthopaedics 20 (2006) 203-207
8. Hoey D., and Taylor D. Fatigue in porous PMMA: the effect of stress concentrations. International Journal of Fatigue 30 6 (2008) 989-995
9. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 38 (1997) 155-182
10. Gilbert J.L., Hasenwinkel J.M., Wixson R.L., and Lautenschlager E.P. A theoretical and experimental analysis of polymerization shrinkage of bone cement: a potential major source of porosity. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 52 (2000) 210-218
11. Topoleski T.L.D., Ducheyne P., and Cuckler J.M. Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 14 (1993) 1165-1172
12. Murphy B.P., and Prendergast P.J. On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of bone cement. International Journal of Fatigue 22 (2000) 855-864
13. Jasty M., Davies J.P., O'Connor D.O., Burke D.W., Harrigan T.P., and Harris W.H. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 259 (1990) 122-129
14. Dunne N.J., Orr J.F., Mushipe M.T., and Eveleigh R.J. The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 239-245
15. Eveleigh R.J., Dunne N.J., Mushipe M.T., Orr J.F., and Beverland D.E. The fatigue life of bone cement: how is it affected by mixer design, vacuum level and user technique. Journal of Advanced Perioperative Care 1 1 (2002) 13-17
16. Linden U., and Gillquist J. Air inclusion in bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 247 (1989) 148-151
17. Demarest VA, Lautensclager EP, Wixson RL. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement. In: 9th annual meeting of the society for biomaterials, Birmingham, Alabama, 1983, p. 37.
18. Ling R.S., and Lee A.J. Porosity reduction in acrylic cement is clinically irrelevant. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 355 (1998) 249-253
19. Hoey D., and Taylor D. Quantitative analysis of the effect of porosity on the fatigue strength of bone cement. Acta Biomaterialia 5 2 (2009) 719-726
20. Geiger M.H., Keating E.M., Ritter M.A., Jeffrey G.A., Faris P.M., and Meding J.B. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 382 (2001) 258-266
21. Malchau H., Herberts P., and Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 64 5 (1993) 497-506
22. van de Belt H., Neut D., Uges D.R.A., Schenk W., van Horn J.R., van der Mei H.C., et al. Surface roughness, porosity and wettability of gentamicin-loaded bone cements and their antibiotic release. Biomaterials 21 (2000) 1981-1987
23. Bruens M.L., Pieterman H., de Wijn J.R., and Vaandrager J.M. Porous polymethylmethacrylate as bone substitute in the craniofacial area. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 14 4 (2003) 596-598
24. Janssen D., Stolk J., and Verdonschot M. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 23 (2005) 691-697
25. Taylor D. The theory of critical distances: a new perspective in fracture mechanics (2007), Elsevier
26. Hoey D., and Taylor D. Comparison of the fatigue behaviour of two different forms of PMMA. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 32 3 (2009) 261-269
27. Orr J.F., Dunne N.J., and Quinn J.C. Shrinkage stresses in bone cement. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 2933-2940
28. Messick K.J., Miller M.A., Damron L.A., Race A., Clarke M.T., and Mann K.A. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 89B 8 (2007) 1115-1121