Further thoughts on parameters and features in second language acquisition: A reply to peer comments on Lardiere's 'Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition' in SLR 25(2)

Second Language Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 409-422

  Lardiere, Donna ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69649088986     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267658309104579     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderssen, M. 2007: The acquisition of compositional definiteness in Norwegian. Nordlyd 34, 252-75.
2. Bejar, S. 2003: Phi-syntax: a theory of agreement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
3. Carroll, S.E. 2001: Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Choi, M.-H. and Lardiere, D. 2006a: The interpretation of wh-in-situ in Korean second language acquisition. In Belletti, A., Bennati, E., Chesi, C., DiDomenico, E. and Ferrari, I., editors, Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 125-35.
5. Choi, M.-H. and Lardiere, D. 2006b: Acquiring the interpretation of wh-expressions in Korean as a second language. Paper presented at the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2006), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
6. Chomsky, N. 1986: Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
7. Chomsky, N. 2005: Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 1-22.
8. Clark, R. 1992: The selection of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 2, 83-149.
9. Cowper, E. 2005: The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language 81, 10-46.
10. Embick, D. 2007: Linearization and local dislocation: derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33, 303-336.
11. Flynn, S. 1988: Nature of development in L2 acquisition and implications for theories of language acquisition in general. In Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W., editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 76-89.
12. Greenberg, J.H. 1963: Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J.H., editor, Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Halmøy, M. 2005: Bare nouns, number and (in)definiteness. Paper presented at SCL 21, Trondheim.
14. Harley, H. and Ritter, E. 2002: Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78, 482-526.
15. Hawkins, J.A. 2004: Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Hawkins, R. and Hattori, H. 2006: Interpretation of multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research 22, 269-301.
17. Hyams, N. 1987: The theory of parameters and syntactic development. In Williams, E. and Roeper, T., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1-22.
18. Lardiere, D. 1998: Case and tense in the 'fossilized' steady state. Second Language Research 14, 1-26.
19. Lardiere, D. 2007: Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: a case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Neeleman, A. and Szendro{double acute}i, K. 2007: Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 671-714.
21. Newmeyer, F.J. 2004: Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4, 181-234.
22. Newmeyer, F.J. 2005: Possible and probable languages: a generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Newmeyer, F.J. 2006: A rejoinder to 'On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: a reply to Newmeyer' by Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg. Available online at: http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000248 (April 2009).
24. Nishigauchi, T. and Roeper, T. 1987: Deductive parameters and the growth of empty categories. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 91-121.
25. Ramchand, G. and Svenonius, P. 2008: Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics. In Biberauer, T., editor, The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219-45.
26. Safir, K. 1987: Comments on Wexler and Manzini. In Williams, E. and Roeper, T., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 77-90.
27. Tsimpli, I.-M. and Dimitrakopoulou, M. 2007: The interpretability hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23, 215-42.
28. Werker, J.F. and Tees, R.C. 2005: Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46, 233-51.
29. Wexler, K. and Manzini, M.R. 1987: Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Williams, E. and Roeper, T., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 41-76.
30. White, L. 1987: A note on Phinney. In Williams, E. and Roeper, T., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel, 239-46.
31. Williams, E. 1987: Introduction. In Williams, E. and Roeper, T., editors, Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.