Optimization on tribological properties of aramid fibre and CaSO4 whisker reinforced non-metallic friction material with analytic hierarchy process and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 551-555

  Zhu, Zhencai ^a   Xu, Lei ^a   Chen, Guoan ^a   Li, Yilei ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARAMID FIBRE; ENRICHMENT EVALUATION; EVALUATION METHOD; FRICTION TEST; GEOMETRICAL ANALYSIS; NON-METALLIC; OPTIMAL MATERIALS; OPTIMAL PROPERTIES; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PREFERENCE RANKING; PROMETHEE; TRIBOLOGICAL PROPERTIES;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BRAKES; FRICTION; FRICTION MATERIALS; OPTIMIZATION; TEXTILE MILLS; TRIBOLOGY;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 69549123881     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.015     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kim S.J., and Jang H. Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp. Tribol Int 33 (2000) 477-484
2. Kim S.J., Cho M.H., Lim D.S., and Jang H. Synergistic effects of aramid pulp and potassium titanate whiskers in the automotive friction material. Wear 251 (2001) 1484-1491
3. Zhao Y.L., Lu Y.F., and Wright M.A. Sensitivity series and friction surface analysis of non-metallic friction materials. Mater Des 27 (2006) 833-838
4. Satapathy B.K., and Bijwe J. Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres: Part II. Optimisation by balancing and ranking using multiple criteria decision model (MCDM). Wear 257 (2004) 585-589
5. Takahisa K., and Hiroshi S. Friction material design for brake pads using database. Tribol Trans 44 (2001) 137-141
6. Albadvi A., Chaharsooghi S.K., and Esfahanipour A. Decision making in stock trading: an application of PROMETHEE. Eur J Oper Res 177 (2007) 673-683
7. Da M. Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. J Intell Manuf 19 (2008) 397-406
8. Beynon M.J., and Wells P. The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: a PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis. Omega 36 (2008) 384-394
9. Halouani N., Chabchoub H., and Martel J.M. PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection. Eur J Oper Res 195 (2009) 841-849
10. Chou T.Y., Lin W.T., Lin C.Y., Chou W.C., and Huang P.H. Application of the PROMETHEE technique to determine depression outlet location and flow direction in DEM. J Hydrol 287 (2004) 49-61
11. Behzadian M., Kazemzadeh R.B., Albadvi A., and Aghdasi M. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res (2009) 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
12. Brans J.P., and Vincke P. A preference ranking organisation method (the PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manage Sci 31 (1985) 647-656
13. Albayrak E., and Erensal Y.C. Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance. An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. J Intell Manuf 15 (2004) 491-503
14. Brans J.P., Vincke P., and Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24 (1986) 228-238
15. Saaty T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1 (2008) 83-98