A framework to support multiple reconfiguration strategies

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Communication Systems, Autonomics 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Rosa, Liliana ^a   Rodrigues, Luís ^b   Lopes, Antónia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b INESC ID   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

COMPOSITION FRAMEWORKS; DISTRIBUTED APPLICATIONS; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; LOCAL RECONFIGURATIONS; RECONFIGURATION PROCESS; SELF-RECONFIGURABLE; SERVICE COMPOSITIONS; STRATEGY SELECTION;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EID: 69549116963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4108/ICST.AUTONOMICS2007.2113     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. T. Batista and N. Rodriguez. Dynamic reconfiguration of component-based applications. In PDSE’00: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Engineering for Parallel and Distributed Systems, page 32, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society.
2. G. Chen and D. Kotz. A survey of context-aware mobile computing research. Technical report, Hanover, NH, USA, 2000.
3. W.-K. Chen, M. A. Hiltunen, and R. D. Schlichting. Constructing adaptive software in distributed systems. In ICDCS’01: Proc. of the The 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, page 635, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE.
4. A. J. Demers, K. Petersen, M. J. Spreitzer, D. B. Terry, M. M. Theimer, and B. B. Welch. The bayou architecture: Support for data sharing among mobile users. In Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications, pages 2–7, Santa Cruz, California, 8-9 1994.
5. H.Liu and M.Parashar. Component-based programming model for autonomic applications. In ICAC’04. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2004.
6. F. Kon, F. Costa, G. Blair, and R. H. Campbell. The case for reflective middleware. Commun. ACM, 45(6):33–38, 2002.
7. J. Kramer and J. Magee. Analysing dynamic change in software architectures: A case study. In CDS’98: Proceedings of the International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, page 91, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society.
8. Y. Kwon, Y. Fang, and H. Latchman. Improving transport layer performance by using a novel mac protocol with fast collision resolution in wireless lans. In MSWiM’02: Proc. of the 5th ACM international workshop on Modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. ACM Press, 2002.
9. X. Liu, R. van Renesse, M. Bickford, C. Kreitz, and R. Constable. Protocol switching: Exploiting meta-properties. ICDCSW’00: International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 00:0037, 2001.
10. P. K. McKinley, S. M. Sadjadi, E. P. Kasten, and B. H. C. Cheng. A taxonomy of compositional adaptation. Technical Report MSU-CSE-04-17, Department of Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, May 2004.
11. S. Mishra, L. L. Peterson, and R. D. Schlichting. Consul: A communication substrate for fault-tolerant distributed programs. Technical Report TR 91-32, Tucson, AZ (USA), 1991.
12. J. Mocito, L. Rosa, N. Almeida, H. Miranda, L. Rodrigues, and A. Lopes. Context adaptation of the communication stack. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems (IJPEDS), 21(2):169–181, 2006.
13. M. J. Monteiro, J. Pereira, and L. Rodrigues. Integration of flight simulator 2002 with an epidemic multicast protocol. In International Workshop on Large-Scale Group Communication,(in conjuction with The 22nd Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems), 2003.
14. B. D. Noble and M. Satyanarayanan. Experience with adaptive mobile applications in odyssey. Mob. Netw. Appl., 4(4):245–254, 1999.
15. L. Rodrigues, H. Miranda, R. Almeida, J. Martins,, and P. Vicente. Strong replication in the globdata middleware. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Dependable Middleware-Based Systems, pages G96–G104, Washington D.C., USA, June 2002. IEEE. (Suplemental Volume of the 2002 Dependable Systems and Networks Conference, DSN 2002).
16. L. Rodrigues, J. Mocito, and N. Carvalho. From spontaneous total order to uniform total order: different degrees of optimistic delivery. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’06), Dijon, France, Apr. 2006. ACM.
17. L. Rosa, A. Lopes, and L. Rodrigues. Policy-driven adaptation of protocol stacks. In International Conference in Autonomic Systems, Silicon Valley, CA, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
18. L. Rosa, L. Rodrigues, and A. Lopes. Appia to rappia: Refactoring a protocol composition framework for dynamic reconfiguration. DI/FCUL TR 07–4, Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon, March 2007.
19. K. Rothermel and T. Helbig. An adaptive stream synchronization protocol. In NOSSDAV’95: Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, London, UK, 1995. Springer-Verlag.
20. P. Sudame and B. R. Badrinath. On providing support for protocol adaptation in mobile wireless networks. Mob. Netw. Appl., 6(1):43–55, 2001.
21. B. Swaminathan and K. J. Goldman. Dynamic reconfiguration with i/o abstraction. In SPDP’95: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributeed Processing, page 496, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. IEEE Computer Society.
22. S. Teixeira, P. Vicente, A. Pinto, H. Miranda, L. Rodrigues, and A. Martins, J. Rito-Silva. Configuring the communication middleware to support multi-user object-oriented environments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications (DOA), pages 965–980, Irvine (CA), USA, Oct. 2002.
23. R. van Renesse, K. Birman, M. Hayden, A. Vaysburd, and D. Karr. Building adaptive systems using ensemble. Softw. Pract. Exper., 28(9):963–979, 1998.
24. R. van Renesse, K. P. Birman, and S. Maffeis. Horus: a flexible group communication system. Commun. ACM, 39(4):76–83, 1996.