Physical and Cognitive Functioning After 3 Years Can Be Predicted Using Information From the Diagnostic Process in Recently Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1478-1488

  de Groot, Vincent ^a   Beckerman, Heleen ^a   Uitdehaag, Bernard M ^a   Hintzen, Rogier Q ^b   Minneboo, Arjan ^a   Heymans, Martijn W ^a   Lankhorst, Gustaaf J ^a   Polman, Chris H ^a   Bouter, Lex M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cohort studies; Disability evaluation; Multiple sclerosis; Prognosis; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISEASE; SOCIAL DISABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION DISORDERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69549111361     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Janssens A.C., De Boer J.B., Van Doorn P.A., et al. Expectations of wheelchair-dependency in recently diagnosed patients with multiple sclerosis and their partners. Eur J Neurol 10 (2003) 287-293
2. Janssens A.C., Van Doorn P.A., De Boer J.B., Van der Meché F.G., Passchier J., and Hintzen R.Q. Perception of prognostic risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: the relationship with anxiety, depression, and disease-related distress. J Clin Epidemiol 57 (2004) 180-186
3. Runmarker B., Andersson C., Oden A., and Andersen O. Prediction of outcome in multiple sclerosis based on multivariate models. J Neurol 241 (1994) 597-604
4. Runmarker B., and Andersen O. Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty-five years of follow-up. Brain 116 (1993) 117-134
5. Weinshenker B.G., Bass B., Rice G.P.A., et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course. Brain 112 (1989) 1419-1428
6. Weinshenker B.G., Bass B., Rice G.P.A., et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 112 (1989) 133-146
7. Weinshenker B.G., Rice G.P.A., Noseworthy J.H., Carriere W., Baskerville J., and Ebers G.C. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 3. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome. Brain 114 (1991) 1045-1056
8. Amato M.P., and Ponziani G. A prospective study on the prognosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 21 (2000) S831-S838
9. Confavreux C., Vukusic S., and Adeleine P. Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain 126 (2003) 770-782
10. Pittock S.J., Mayr W.T., McClelland R.L., et al. Change in MS-related disability in a population-based cohort: a 10-year follow-up study. Neurology 62 (2004) 51-59
11. Matheny M.E., Ohno-Machado L., and Resnic F.S. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology. J Biomed Inform 38 (2005) 367-375
12. Harrison D.A., Brady A.R., Parry G.J., Carpenter J.R., and Rowan K. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom. Crit Care Med 34 (2006) 1378-1388
13. Perel P., Arango M., Clayton T., et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 336 (2008) 425-429
14. Van Koningsveld R., Steyerberg E.W., Hughes R.A., Swan A.V., Van Doorn P.A., and Jacobs B.C. A clinical prognostic scoring system for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet Neurol 6 (2007) 589-594
15. Steyerberg E.W., Eijkemans M.J., Harrell Jr. F.E., and Habbema J.D. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med 19 (2000) 1059-1079
16. Bergamaschi R., Quaglini S., Trojano M., et al. Early prediction of the long term evolution of multiple sclerosis: the Bayesian Risk Estimate for Multiple Sclerosis (BREMS) score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78 (2007) 757-759
17. Poser C.M., Paty D.W., Scheinberg L., et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13 (1983) 227-231
18. De Groot V., Beckerman H., Lankhorst G.J., Polman C.H., and Bouter L.M. The initial course of daily functioning in multiple sclerosis: a three-year follow-up study. Mult Scler 11 (2005) 713-718
19. De Groot V., Beckerman H., Twisk J.W., et al. Vitality, perceived social support and disease activity determine the performance of social roles in recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal analysis. J Rehabil Med 40 (2008) 151-157
20. Kurtzke J.F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33 (1983) 1444-1452
21. Uitdehaag B.M.J., Adèr H.J., Roosma T.J., De Groot V., Kalkers N.F., and Polman C.H. Multiple sclerosis functional composite: impact of reference population and interpretation of changes. Mult Scler 8 (2002) 366-371
22. Rao S.M., Leo G.J., Bernardin L., and Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41 (1991) 685-691
23. Boringa J.B., Lazeron R.H., Reuling I.E., et al. The brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests: normative values allow application in multiple sclerosis clinical practice. Mult Scler 7 (2001) 263-267
24. Achiron A., and Barak Y. Cognitive impairment in probable multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74 (2003) 443-446
25. Granger C.V., Cotter A.C., Hamilton B.B., Fiedler R.C., and Hens M.M. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71 (1990) 870-875
26. Van Bennekom C.A.M., Jelles F., Lankhorst G.J., and Bouter L.M. The rehabilitation activities profile: a validation study of its use as a disability index with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 (1995) 501-507
27. Aaronson N.K., Muller M., Cohen P.D., et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 1055-1068
28. Laman H., and Lankhorst G.J. Subjective weighting of disability: an approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 16 (1994) 198-204
29. Lankhorst G.J., Jelles F., Smits R.C.F., et al. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the Disability and Impact Profile (DIP). J Neurol 243 (1996) 469-474
30. Kalkers N.F., Bergers L., De Groot V., et al. Concurrent validity of the MS Functional Composite using MRI as a biological disease marker. Neurology 56 (2001) 215-219
31. Bot J.C., Barkhof F., Polman C.H., et al. Spinal cord abnormalities in recently diagnosed MS patients: added value of spinal MRI examination. Neurology 62 (2004) 226-233
32. Steyerberg E.W., Eijkemans M.J., and Habbema J.D. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 52 (1999) 935-942
33. Steyerberg E.W., Harrell Jr. F.E., Borsboom G.J., Eijkemans M.J., Vergouwe Y., and Habbema J.D. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54 (2001) 774-781
34. NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model, version 2, 1999. Software for Windows 95/98/NT. Available at: http://www.stat.psu.edu/∼jls/misoftwa.html. Accessed August 16, 2009.
35. Harrell F.E., Lee K.L., and Mark D.B. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15 (1996) 361-387
36. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 (1988) 1285-1293
37. Solari A., Mancuso L., Motta A., Mendozzi L., and Serrati C. Comparison of two brief neuropsychological batteries in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 8 (2002) 169-176
38. Aupperle R.L., Beatty W.W., Shelton F.N., and Gontkovsky S.T. Three screening batteries to detect cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 8 (2002) 382-389
39. Dent A., and Lincoln N.B. Screening for memory problems in multiple sclerosis. Br J Clin Psychol 39 (2000) 311-315
40. Hukkelhoven C.W., Rampen A.J., Maas A.I., et al. Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not valid. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 132-143
41. Bleeker S.E., Moll H.A., Steyerberg E.W., et al. External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 56 (2003) 826-832
42. Altman D.G., and Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?. Stat Med 19 (2000) 453-473
43. Righini M., and Bounameaux H. External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med 10 (2004) 345-349
44. Justice A.C., Covinsky K.E., and Berlin J.A. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 130 (1999) 515-524
45. Grol R., and Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 362 (2003) 1225-1230
46. Bero L.A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J.M., Harvey E., Oxman A.D., and Thomson M.A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 317 (1998) 465-468