Removal of arsenic from wastewater using iron compound: Comparing two different types of adsorbents in the context of LCA

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 688-697

  Dodbiba, Gjergj ^a   Nukaya, Teiji ^b   Kamioka, Yousuke ^b   Tanimura, Yuji ^b   Fujita, Toyohisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b Nittetsu Mining Co Ltd ^*  (Japan)

Author keywords

Adsorbent; Adsorption isotherm; Adsorption kinetic; Arsenic; Iron compound; Life cycle assessment; Polyferric sulfate

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION DENSITIES; ADSORPTION KINETIC; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FORMATION POTENTIAL; GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL; HUMAN TOXICITY POTENTIALS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; POLYFERRIC SULFATE; RATE OF ADSORPTION; WASTE PRODUCTS;

ADSORBENTS; ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS; ARSENIC; ARSENIC COMPOUNDS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION; GLOBAL WARMING; IRON COMPOUNDS; IRON REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); LIFE CYCLE; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION;

ADSORBENT; ARSENIC; FERRIC CHLORIDE; IRON DERIVATIVE; POLYFERRIC SULFATE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ARSENIC; ESTIMATION METHOD; IRON; ISOTHERM; KINETICS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT; WASTEWATER;

ACIDIFICATION; ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOOXIDATION; PROCESS MONITORING; TOXICITY TESTING; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 69549105817     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Benjamin M.M. Water chemistry (2002), McGraw-Hill, New York
2. Benjamin M.M., Sletten R.S., Bailey R.P., and Bennett T. Sorption and filtration of metals using iron-oxide coated sand. Water Research 30 11 (1996) 2609-2620
3. Curran M.A. Environmental life-cycle assessment (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York
4. Dambies L., Vincent T., and Guibal E. Treatment of arsenic-containing solutions using chitosan derivatives: uptake mechanism and sorption performance. Water Resource 36 (2002) 3699-3710
5. Deschampsa E., Ciminellia V.S.T., and Hoelle W.H. Removal of As(III) and As(V) from water using a natural Fe and Mn enriched sample. Water Research 39 (2005) 5212-5220
6. Dodbiba G., Kang K., Sadaki J., and Fujita T. Removing arsenic and recovering iron from acid mine drainage. Proceeding of the XXIII International Mineral Processing Congress. Istanbul, Turkey (2006) 2123-2127
7. Dodbiba G., Takahashi K., Sadaki J., and Fujita T. The recycling of plastic wastes from discarded TV sets: comparing energy recovery with mechanical recycling in the context of life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 4 (2008) 458-470
8. Fujita T., Shibayama A., and Dodbiba G. Anionic metal ion removal from wastewater by, adsorbent. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering 6 (2006) 357-362
9. Guinee J.B. Handbook of life cycle assessment (2002), Kluwer Academic Publisher
10. Heijungs R. A generic method for identification of option for cleaner product. Ecological Economics 10 (1994) 69-81
11. Heijungs R., Guinee J., Huppes G., Lankreijer R.M., Udo de Haes H.A., Wagerner Sleeswijk A., Ansems A.M.M., Eggels P.G., van Duin R., and de Goede H.P. Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide and backgrounds (1992), CML, Leiden University, Leiden
12. Hoell W.H., and Driehaus W. Elimination of arsenic from drinking water by means of a selective adsorbent. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Drinking Water Quality Management and Treatment Processes. Kaohsiung, Taiwan, May 27-29 (2002) 6-1-6-6
13. JEMAI, Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry, JEMAI On-line Database. Available from internet: https://lcadb.jemai.or.jp/lca/servlet/Default.
14. Langmuir I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society 38 (1916) 2221-2295
15. Leontief W. Environment repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 52 3 (1970) 262-271
16. Mohan D., and Pittman C.U. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents-a critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 142 (2007) 1-53
17. Mott C.J.B. Anion and ligand exchange. The Chemistry of Soil Processes (1981) 179-219
18. Parfitt R.L. Anion adsorption by soils and soil materials. Advance Agronomy 30 (1978) 1-50
19. Shibayama A., Uchida A., Fujita T., and Hashimoto K. Resources Processing 51 (2004) 181-188
20. WHO. United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, Available from internet: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs210/en; 2001.