Wildlife toxicology: Biomarkers of genotoxic exposures at a hazardous waste site

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 886-898

  Matson, Cole W ^a   Gillespie, Annika M ^c   McCarthy, Chris ^d   McDonald, Thomas J ^e   Bickham, John W ^b,f   Sullivan, Robert ^g   Donnelly, K C ^c,e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CH2M HILL   (United States)

^e TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^f PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acris crepitans; Biomarker; Chromosomal damage; Cricket frogs; DNA damage; Flow cytometry; Gambusia affinis; Genotoxicity; Mosquitofish; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Indexed keywords

ACENAPHTHENE DERIVATIVE; ACENAPHTHYLENE; ANTHRACENE; BENZ[A]ANTHRACENE; BENZO[A]PYRENE; BENZO[B]FLUORANTHENE; BENZO[GHI]PERYLENE; BENZO[K]FLUORANTHENE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CHRYSENE; CREOSOTE; DIBENZ[A,H]ANTHRACENE; DIBENZOFURAN; FLUORANTHENE; FLUORENE; INDENO[1,2,3 CD]PYRENE; NAPHTHALENE; PHENANTHRENE; PYRENE; SURFACE WATER;

BIOACCUMULATION; BIOASSAY; BIOMARKER; CHROMOSOME; CREOSOTE; CYPRINID; DNA; ECOTOXICOLOGY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FROG; GENOTOXICITY; HAZARDOUS WASTE; PAH; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEDIMENT POLLUTION;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL COMMUNITY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; BODY BURDEN; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CHRONIC TOXICITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FISH; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FROG; GENOME SIZE; GENOTOXICITY; HAZARDOUS WASTE; MOSQUITO FISH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SEDIMENT; WILDLIFE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; HAZARDOUS WASTE; MUTAGENS; RANIDAE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ACRIS; ACRIS CREPITANS; AMPHIBIA; GAMBUSIA AFFINIS;

EID: 69549095838     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0350-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ATSDR (2004) ToxFaQs™ for wood creosote, coal tar creosote, coal tar, coal tar pitch, and coal tar pitch volatiles. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
2. GC Barbee J Barich B Duncan JW Bickham CW Matson CJ Hintze RL Autenrieth G-D Zhou TJ McDonald L Cizmas D Norton KC Donnelly 2008 In situ biomonitoring of PAH-contaminated sediments using juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71 454 464
3. JW Bickham BG Hanks MJ Smolen T Lamb JW Gibbons 1988 Flow cytometric analysis of the effects of low-level radiation exposure on natural populations of slider turtles (Pseudemys scripta) Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 17 837 841
4. JW Bickham VL Sawin DW Burton K McBee 1992 Flow-cytometric analysis of the effects of triethylenemelamine on somatic and testicular tissues of the rat Cytometry 13 368 373
5. JW Bickham VL Sawin K McBee MJ Smolen JN Derr 1994 Further flow cytometric studies of the effects of triethylenemelamine on somatic and testicular tissues of the rat Cytometry 15 222 229
6. JW Bickham JA Mazet J Blake MJ Smolen Y Lou BE Ballachey 1998 Flow-cytometric determination of genotoxic effects of exposure to petroleum in mink and sea otters Ecotoxicology 7 191 199
7. JW Bickham GT Rowe G Palatnikov A Mekhtiev M Mekhtiev RY Kasimov DW Hauschultz JK Wickliffe WJ Rogers 1998 Acute and genotoxic effects of Baku Harbor sediment on Russian sturgeon, Acipenser guildensteidti Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61 512 518
8. JW Bickham S Sandhu PD Hebert L Chikhi R Athwal 2000 Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology Mutat Res 463 33 51
9. N Bihari M Fafandel 2004 Interspecies differences in DNA single strand breaks caused by benzo(a)pyrene and marine environment Mutat Res 552 209 217
10. CH2MHill (2005) Remedial investigation and feasibility study report. Jasper Creosoting Company, Jasper
11. TW Custer CM Custer RK Hines DW Sparks MJ Melancon DJ Hoffman JW Bickham JK Wickliffe 2000 Mixed-function oxygenases, oxidative stress, and chromosomal damage measured in lesser scaup wintering on the Indiana Harbor Canal Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38 522 529
12. S De Flora C Bennicelli M Bagnasco 1994 Genotoxicity of mercury compounds. A review Mutat Res 317 57 79
13. MH Depledge 1994 Genotypic toxicity: implications for individuals and populations Environ Health Perspect 102 Suppl 12 101 104
14. Eisler R (1987) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. 1.11. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USA
15. CL Folt CY Chen MV Moore J Burnaford 1999 Synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors Limnol Oceanogr 44 864 877
16. F Gagne S Trottier C Blaise J Sproull B Ernst 1995 Genotoxicity of sediment extracts obtained in the vicinity of a creosote-treated wharf to rainbow trout hepatocytes Toxicol Lett 78 175 182
17. L Gauthier E Tardy F Mouchet J Marty 2004 Biomonitoring of the genotoxic potential (micronucleus assay) and detoxifying activity (EROD induction) in the River Dadou (France), using the amphibian Xenopus laevis Sci Total Environ 323 47 61
18. LS George CE Dallas IL Brisbin Jr DL Evans 1991 Flow cytometric DNA analysis of ducks accumulating 137Cs on a reactor reservoir Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 21 337 347
19. JP Incardona TK Collier NL Scholz 2004 Defects in cardiac function precede morphological abnormalities in fish embryos exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 196 191 205
20. TW La Point WT Waller 2000 Field assessments in conjunction with whole effluent toxicity testing Environ Toxicol Chem 19 14 24
21. T Lamb JW Bickham JW Gibbons MJ Smolen S McDowell 1991 Genetic damage in a population of slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) inhabiting a radioactive reservoir Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20 138 142
22. Landis WG, Yu M-H (1995) Introduction to environmental toxicology: impacts of chemicals upon ecological systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
23. DC Malins BB McCain JT Landahl MS Myers MM Krahn DW Brown S-L Chan WT Roubal 1988 Neoplastic and other diseases in fish in relation to toxic chemicals: an overview Aquat Toxicol 11 43 67
24. VL Maria AC Correia MA Santos 2003 Genotoxic and hepatic biotransformation responses induced by the overflow of pulp mill and secondary-treated effluents on Anguilla anguilla L Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 55 126 137
25. VL Maria AC Correia MA Santos 2004 Genotoxic and biochemical responses in caged eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) after short-term exposure to harbour waters Environ Int 29 923 929
26. CW Matson JC Franson T Hollmen M Kilpi M Hario PL Flint JW Bickham 2004 Evidence of chromosomal damage in common eiders (Somateria mollissima) from the Baltic Sea Mar Pollut Bull 49 1066 1071 (Pubitemid 39534976)
27. CW Matson G Palatnikov A Islamzadeh TJ McDonald RL Autenrieth KC Donnelly JW Bickham 2005 Chromosomal damage in two species of aquatic turtles (Emys orbicularis and Mauremys caspica) inhabiting contaminated sites in Azerbaijan Ecotoxicology 14 513 525
28. CW Matson GM Palatnikov TJ McDonald RL Autenrieth KC Donnelly TA Anderson JE Canas A Islamzadeh JW Bickham 2005 Patterns of genotoxicity and contaminant exposure: evidence of genomic instability in the marsh frogs (Rana ridibunda) of Sumgayit, Azerbaijan Environ Toxicol Chem 24 2055 2064
29. K McBee JW Bickham 1988 Petrochemical-related DNA damage in wild rodents detected by flow cytometry Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 40 343 349
30. PD Monson DJ Call DA Cox K Liber GT Ankley 1999 Photoinduced toxicity of fluoranthene to northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) Environ Toxicol Chem 18 308 312
31. JG Mueller DP Middaugh SE Lantz PJ Chapman 1991 Biodegradation of creosote and pentachlorophenol in contaminated groundwater: chemical and biological assessment Appl Environ Microbiol 57 1277 1285
32. JS Peterson LJ Bain 2004 Differential gene expression in anthracene-exposed mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) Aquat Toxicol 66 345 355
33. BL Preston J Shackelford 2002 Multiple stressor effects on benthic biodiversity of Chesapeake Bay: implications for ecological risk assessment Ecotoxicology 11 85 99
34. BL Preston TW Snell DM Fields MJ Weissburg 2001 The effects of fluid motion on toxicant sensitivity of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Aquat Toxicol 52 117 131
35. Shugart LR, Theodorakis CW, Bickham AM, Bickham JW (2003) Genetic effects of contaminant exposure and potential impacts on animal populations. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1129-1147
36. CW Theodorakis JW Bickham T Lamb PA Medica TB Lyne 2001 Integration of genotoxicity and population genetic analyses in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami) exposed to radionuclide contamination at the Nevada Test Site, USA Environ Toxicol Chem 20 317 326
37. AR Timme-Laragy CJ Cockman CW Matson RT Di Giulio 2007 Synergistic induction of AHR regulated genes in developmental toxicity from co-exposure to two model PAHs in zebrafish Aquat Toxicol 85 241 250
38. USEPA (1996a) Method 3510C: pressurized fluid extraction (PFE), SW-486, test methods for evaluating solid waste physical/chemical methods. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
39. USEPA (1996b) Method 3545: pressurized fluid extraction (PFE), SW-486, test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
40. USEPA (1996c) Method 8270C: semivolatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), SW-846, test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
41. USEPA (2004) Hart creosoting company fact sheet, vol 2005. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
42. USEPA (2005a) Pesticides: creosote and its use as a wood preservative. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
43. USEPA (2005b) U.S. EPA integrated risk information system (IRIS), vol 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
44. LL Vindelov IJ Christensen 1990 A review of techniques and results obtained in one laboratory by an integrated system of methods designed for routine clinical flow cytometric DNA analysis Cytometry 11 753 770
45. Vindelov LL, Christensen IJ (1994) Detergent and proteolytic enzyme-based techniques for nuclear isolation and DNA content analysis. In: Darzynkiewicz Z, Robinson JP, Crissman HA (eds) Flow cytometry: methods in cell biology, 2nd edn, Part A. Academic, New York, pp 219-229
46. DM Wassenberg RT Di Giulio 2004 Synergistic embryotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists with cytochrome P4501A inhibitors in Fundulus heteroclitus Environ Health Perspect 112 1658 1664
47. DM Wassenberg RT Di Giulio 2004 Teratogenesis in Fundulus heteroclitus embryos exposed to a creosote-contaminated sediment extract and CYP1A inhibitors Mar Environ Res 58 163 168
48. MJ Winter N Day RA Hayes EW Taylor PJ Butler JK Chipman 2004 DNA strand breaks and adducts determined in feral and caged chub (Leuciscus cephalus) exposed to rivers exhibiting variable water quality around Birmingham, UK Mutat Res 552 163 175
49. I Wirgin JR Waldman 1998 Altered gene expression and genetic damage in North American fish populations Mutat Res 399 193 219
50. RM Zucker KH Elstein RE Easterling EJ Massaro 1990 Flow cytometric analysis of the mechanism of methylmercury cytotoxicity Am J Pathol 137 1187 1198