Measuring preference-based quality of life using the euroqol EQ-5D in patients with cerebral aneurysms

Neurosurgery

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 565-572

  King Jr , Joseph T ^a,b   Tsevat, Joel ^c,d   Roberts, Mark S ^e  

^a VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Health status; Intracranial aneurysm; Neurosurgery; Outcomes assessment (health care); Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DEPRESSION; EUROPEAN QUALITY OF LIFE 5 DIMENSION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; NEUROSURGERY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANKIN SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURVIVAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 69549092366     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350980.01519.D8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aday LA: Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. San Francisco, Jossey- Bass Publishers, 1996.
2. Brazier JE, Roberts J: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 42:851-859, 2004.
3. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21:271-292, 2002. (Pubitemid 34143147)
4. Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, Sluzewski M, Groen RJ, Lo RT, Tulleken CA: Quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by neurosurgical clipping or by embolisation with coils. A prospective, observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis 17:44-52, 2004. (Pubitemid 38145907)
5. Brott TG, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V: Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864-870, 1989. (Pubitemid 19188240)
6. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V: The Barthel ADL index: A reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 10:61-63, 1988. (Pubitemid 18159441)
7. Darlington AS, Dippel DW, Ribbers GM, van Balen R, Passchier J, Busschbach JJ: Coping strategies as determinants of quality of life in stroke patients: A longitudinal study. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:401-407, 2007. (Pubitemid 46742329)
8. Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A: Health care contingent valuation studies: A review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 7:313-326, 1998. (Pubitemid 28339960)
9. The Dutch TIA Study Group: The Dutch TIA trial: Protective effects of lowdose aspirin and atenolol in patients with transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke. Stroke 19:512-517, 1988.
10. The EuroQol Group: EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life. Health Policy 16:199-208, 1990.
11. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW: Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics 7:490-502, 1995.
12. Glick HA, Polsky D, Willke RJ, Schulman KA: A comparison of preference assessment instruments used in a clinical trial: Responses to the visual analog scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index. Med Decis Making 19:265-275, 1999. (Pubitemid 29321268)
13. Jennett B, Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1:480-484, 1975.
14. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC: Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 11:478-507, 1976. (Pubitemid 8111230)
15. Kaplan RM, Sieber WJ, Ganiats TG: The Quality of Well-Being Scale: Comparison of the interviewer-administered version with a self-administered questionnaire. Psychol Health 12:783-792, 1997. (Pubitemid 128045642)
16. Keeney RL, Raiffa H: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York, Wiley, 1976.
17. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Roberts MS: Preference-based quality of life in patients with cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 36:303-309, 2005. (Pubitemid 40170813)
18. Langelaan M, de Boer MR, van Nispen RM, Wouters B, Moll AC, van Rens GH: Impact of visual impairment on quality of life: A comparison with quality of life in the general population and with other chronic conditions. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 14:119-126, 2007. (Pubitemid 47026989)
19. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61-65, 1965.
20. Matza LS, Boye KS, Yurgin N: Validation of two generic patient-reported out come measures in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:47, 2007.
21. McDowell I, Newel C: Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp 380-492.
22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH: Psychometric Theory. New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.
23. Orme M, Kerrigan J, Tyas D, Russell N, Nixon R: The effect of disease, functional status, and relapses on the utility of people with multiple sclerosis in the UK. Value Health 10:54-60, 2007. (Pubitemid 46161095)
24. Reuben DB, Siu AL: An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The Physical Performance Test. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1105-1112, 1990.
25. Revicki DA, Kaplan RM: Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 2:477-487, 1993.
26. Saarni SI, Suvisaari J, Sintonen H, Pirkola S, Koskinen S, Aromaa A, Lönnqvist J: Impact of psychiatric disorders on health-related quality of life: General population survey. Br J Psychiatry 190:326-332, 2007. (Pubitemid 46580682)
27. Schrag A, Selai C, Davis J, Lees AJ, Jahanshahi M, Quinn N: Health-related quality of life in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord 18:1464-1469, 2003. (Pubitemid 38035369)
28. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 43:203-220, 2005.
29. Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989.
30. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q: Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 34:702-722, 1996. (Pubitemid 126433265)
31. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL: A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 7:118-133, 1972.
32. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.
33. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220-233, 1996. (Pubitemid 126433231)
34. Xie J, Wu EQ, Zheng ZJ, Sullivan PW, Zhan L, Labarthe DR: Patient-reported health status in coronary heart disease in the United States: Age, sex, racial, and ethnic differences. Circulation 118:491-497, 2008.
35. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361-370, 1983.