Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk
Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16(1): 43-49.
Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer
Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R et al. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 2090-2095.
Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women
Ghosh K, Brandt KR, Sellers TA et al. Association of mammographic density with the pathology of subsequent breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17(4): 872-879.
Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI
Nie K, Chen JH, Chan S et al. Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. Med Phys 2008; 35: 5253-5262.
Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: Relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors
Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray LA, Helvie MA. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: Relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 2004; 230(1): 42-48.
Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics
Aiello EJ, Buist DS, White E, Porter PL. Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14(3): 662-668.
Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triplenegative breast cancer
Ma H, Luo J, Press MF et al. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triplenegative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18(2): 479-485.