Preoperative and intraoperative assessments of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 884-887

  Sato, Shinya ^a   Itamochi, Hiroaki ^a   Shimada, Muneaki ^a   Fujii, Shinya ^a   Naniwa, Jun ^a   Uegaki, Kazunori ^a   Sato, Seiya ^a   Nonaka, Michiko ^a   Ogawa, Toshihide ^a   Kigawa, Junzo ^a  

^a TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Endometrial cancer; Gross assessment; MRI; Myometrial invasion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMETRIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERUS BIOPSY; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOSQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; CANCER STAGING; COLLOID CARCINOMA; CYSTADENOCARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS;

ADENOCARCINOMA, CLEAR CELL; ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; CYSTADENOCARCINOMA, SEROUS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOMETRIUM; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 69449097412     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a7a2d9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106-130.
2. Nakao Y, Yokoyama M, Hara K, et al. MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:343-347.
3. Lee EJ, Byun JY, Kim BS, et al. Staging of early endometrial carcinoma: assessment with T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiographics. 1999;19:937-945.
4. Berman ML, Ballan SC, Lagasse LK, et al. Prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:679-688.
5. John R. Lurain. Uterine cancer. In Berek JS, ed. Berek & Novak's Gynecology 14th edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 2007:1343-1401.
6. Announcements, FIGO stages-1988 revision. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;35:125-127.
7. Yokoyama Y, Maruyama H, Sato S, et al. Indispensability of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:411-417.
8. Mariani A, Keeney GL, Aletti G, et al. Endometrial carcinoma: paraaortic dissemination. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:833-838.
9. Sanjuan A, Cobo T, Pahisa J, et al. Preoperative and intraopeative assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:385-390.
10. Creasman WT, Morrow P, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. Cancer. 1987;60:2035-2041.
11. Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;40:55-65.
12. Larson DM, Connor GP, Broste SK, et al. Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:394-398.
13. Rockall AG, Meroni R, Sohaib SA, et al. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:188-196.
14. Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Barton DP, et al. Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:545-555.
15. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, et al. Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;186:495-501.
16. Sironi S, Colombo E, Villa G, et al. Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;185:207-212.
17. Vorgias G, Hintipas E, Katsoulis M, et al. Intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion and cervical infiltration in patients with endometrial cancer: decision-making accuracy. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:483-486.
18. Hricak H, Stern JL, Fisher MR, et al. Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162:297-305.
19. Sanjuan A, Escaramis G, Ayuso JR, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278:535-539.
20. Orr JW Jr, Taylor PT Jr. Surgical management of endometrial cancer: how much is enough? Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:1-3.
21. Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:11-18.
22. Deleted in proof.
23. Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Flynn SD, et al. Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;194:567-572.
24. Kucera E, Kainz C, Reinthaller A, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section diagnosis in stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;49:62-66.
25. Kayikcioglu F, Boran N, Meydanli MM, et al. Is frozen-section diagnosis a reliable guide in surgical treatment of stage I endometrial carcinoma? Acta Oncol. 2002;41:444-446.
26. Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;77:954-956.
27. Zorlu CG, Cobanoglu O, Isik AZ. Accuracy of Pipelle endometrial sampling in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994; 38:272-275.