Intraoperative endoleak during evar: Frequency, nature, and significance

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 352-359

  Panneton, Jean M ^a,c,d   Sampaio, Sergio M ^e   Shin, Susanna H ^a   Andrews, James C ^b   Bower, Thomas C ^b   Cherry, Kenneth J ^c   Duncan, Audra A ^b   Kalra, Manju ^b   Gloviczki, Peter ^b  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d SENTARA HEART HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

EVAR; Intraoperative endoleak; Reinterventions

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ANGIOGRAPHY; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT FAILURE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 69449096366     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1538574409333581     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991 ; 5: 491-499.
2. Matsumura JS, Moore WS Clinical consequences of periprosthetic leak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Endovascular Technologies Investigators. J Vasc Surg. 1998 ; 27: 606-613.
3. Wain RA, Marin ML, Ohki T., et al. Endoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1998 ; 27: 69-78 ; discussion 78-80.
4. van Marrewijk C., Buth J., Harris PL, Norgren L., Nevelsteen A., Wyatt MG Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2002 ; 35: 461-473. (Pubitemid 46098519)
5. White RA, Donayre C., Walot I., Stewart M. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture following endoluminal graft deployment: report of a predictable event. J Endovasc Ther. 2000 ; 7: 257-262.
6. Back MR, Bowser AN, Johnson BL, Schmacht D., Zwiebel B., Bandyk DF Patency of infrarenal aortic side branches determines early aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 17: 27-34.
7. Reduction in aortic aneurysm size: early results after endovascular graft placement. EVT Investigators. J Vasc Surg. 1997 ; 25: 113-123.
8. Mohan IV, Laheij RJ, Harris PL Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 ; 21: 344-349.
9. Walker SR, Halliday K., Yusuf SW, et al. A study on the patency of the inferior mesenteric and lumbar arteries in the incidence of endoleak following endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic aneurysms. Clin Radiol. 1998 ; 53: 593-595.
10. Arko FR, Rubin GD, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK Type-II endoleaks following endovascular AAA repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther. 2001 ; 8: 503-510.
11. Sampaio SM, Panneton JM, Mozes GI, et al. Aneurysm sac thrombus load predicts type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005 ; 19: 302-309.
12. Sampaio SM, Panneton JM, Mozes GI, et al. Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictive factors. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 ; 18: 621-628.
13. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. the Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002 ; 35: 1048-1060.
14. Panneton JM Entrapment of the limb of an endovascular graft: a peril of saccular aneurysms. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2002 ; 15: 187-189.
15. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, et al. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000 ; 32: 90-107.
16. Armon MP, Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, et al. Thrombus distribution and changes in aneurysm size following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 ; 16: 472-476.
17. Petrik PV, Moore WS Endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the predictive value of preoperative anatomic factors-a review of 100 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2001 ; 33: 739-744.
18. Gorich J., Rilinger N., Sokiranski R., et al. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: are they predictable?-initial results. Radiology. 2001 ; 218: 477-480.
19. Rhee RY, Eskandari MK, Zajko AB, Makaroun MS Long-term fate of the aneurysmal sac after endoluminal exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2000 ; 32: 689-696.
20. White GH, May J., Waugh RC, Chaufour X., Yu W. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1998 ; 5: 305-309.
21. Wolf YG, Tillich M., Lee WA, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK, Rubin GD Changes in aneurysm volume after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2002 ; 36: 305-309.