Evaluation and professionalism

Science and Justice

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 159-160

  Evett, Ian ^a  

^a Drugs Intelligence Laboratory   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; CRIME; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EDITORIAL; EVALUATION; FORENSIC SCIENCE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; POLICE; PROFESSIONALISM;

ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORENSIC SCIENCES; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; ROLE;

EID: 69449095576     PISSN: 13550306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. H. Ognall, Any judge would do the same. The case against Colin Stagg was based on a single rotten plank. The Times, 19 December 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5367901.ece.
2. D. Canter, We need smarter police who are science-savvy. The Times, 19 December 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5367133.ece.
3. Jackson G., Jones S., Booth G., Champod C., and Evett I.W. The nature of forensic science opinion - a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Science and Justice 46 (2006) 33-44
4. Wright M. Focus on...forensic gait analysis. Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigation 4 (2008) 83-95
5. Finkelstein M.O., and Fairley W.B. A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review 84 (1970) 489-517
6. Taroni F., Champod C., and Margot P. Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics 38 (1998) 183-200
7. AFSP. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Science and Justice 49 (3) (2009) xxx-xxx. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.004.