Tubal surgery

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 344-350

  Zarei, Afsoon ^a   Al Ghafri, Wadha ^a   Tulandi, Togas ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Endometriosis; In vitro fertilization; Reproductive surgery; Tubal anastomosis; Tubal surgery hydrosalpinx

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FALLOPOSCOPY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HYDROSALPINX; INFERTILITY; LAPAROTOMY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; SALPINGECTOMY; SALPINGOPLASTY; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION;

ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; LIGATION; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; STERILIZATION REVERSAL;

EID: 69449094066     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b08b5f     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Westrom L, Jeosoef R, Reynold G, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;14:185.
2. Abuzeid MI, Mitwally MF, Ahmed AI, et al. The prevalence of fimbrial pathology in patients with early stages of endometriosis. J Min Inv Gynecol. 2007;14:49-53.
3. Al-Jaroudi D, Herba MJ, Tulandi T. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Min Inv Gynecol. 2005;12:150-152. (Pubitemid 40800370)
4. Marana R, Catalano GF, Muzzi L, et al. The prognostic role of salpingoscopy in laparoscopic tubal surgery. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2991-2995.
5. Marchino GL, Gigante V, Gennarelli G, et al. Salpingoscopic and laparoscopic investigations in relation to fertility outcome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:218-221. (Pubitemid 33020891)
6. Kerin JF, Daykhovsky L, Segalowitz J, et al. Falloposcopy: a microendoscopic technique for visual exploration of the human fallopian tube from the uterotubal ostium to fimbria using a transvaginal approach. Fertil-Steril. 1990;54:390-400. (Pubitemid 20321384)
7. American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Revised ASRM classification. www.asrm.org/Literature/classifications
8. Saleh A, Tulandi T. Reoperation after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometrioma by excision and by fenestration. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:322-324. (Pubitemid 29364632)
9. Al-Fadhli R, Tulandi T. Tubal disease in relation to infertility. In: Falcone T, Hurd WW, ed. Clinical Reproductive Medicine and Surgery. PA: Elsevier; 2008:697-709.
10. Popovic J, Sulovic V, Vucetic D. Laparoscopy treatment of adnexal sterility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32:31-34.
11. Audebert AJM, Pouly JL, Von Theobald P. Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty: an evaluation of 35 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1496-1499.
12. Saleh WA, Dlugi AM. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty in nonocclusive distal tubal disease. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:474-480.
13. Mossa B, Patella A, EbanoV, et al. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32:169-171. (Pubitemid 41687757)
14. Ahmad G, Watson AJ, Mitwally M. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for distal tubal surgery? A meta-analysis. Hum Fert. 2007;10:43-47. (Pubitemid 46470349)
15. Hawkins J, Dube D, Kaplow M, et al. Cost analysis of tubal anastamosis by laparoscopy and by laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:120-124. (Pubitemid 34457069)
16. Cha SH, Lee MH, Kim JH, et al. Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparos. 2001;8:348-352. (Pubitemid 33029042)
17. Boeckxstaens AN, Devroey P, Collins J, et al. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2660-2664.
18. Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:145-147. (Pubitemid 36138866)
19. Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D'Angelo A, et al. In vitro fertilization versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilization reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review. 2009;2:CD004144. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004144.pub2.
20. Gomel V. Reversal of tubal sterilization versus IVF in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a clinical dilemma. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:403-407. (Pubitemid 47565007)
21. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, et al. Pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with or without hydrosalpinx: a metaanalysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1243-1249. (Pubitemid 29224900)
22. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U, et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentric trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2762-2769. (Pubitemid 29520690)
23. Johnson NP, Mak W, Sowter MC. Surgical treatment for tubal disease. In: Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergoing in vitro fertilisation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No: CD002125.pub2.
24. Kontoravdis A, Makrakis E, Pantos K, et al. Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy results in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1642-1649. (Pubitemid 44778714)
25. Rosenfield RB, Stones RE, Coates A, et al. Proximal occlusion of hydrosalpinx by hysteroscopic placement of microinsert before in vitro fertilization -embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1547-1550. (Pubitemid 40615836)
26. Sowter MC, Akande VA, Williams JA, et al. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2147-2150.