Theory of domain formation in inhomogeneous ferromagnetic dipolar condensates within the truncated Wigner approximation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Sau, Jay D ^a,b   Leslie, S R ^c   Stamper Kurn, D M ^b,c   Cohen, Marvin L ^b,c  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; DIPOLE DIPOLE INTERACTIONS; DOMAIN FORMATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FINITE TEMPERATURES; INITIAL STATE; NON-LINEARITY; QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; QUANTITATIVE LEVEL; QUANTUM FLUCTUATION; QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS; SPINOR CONDENSATES; STRONG ANISOTROPY; STRUCTURE FORMATIONS; SYSTEMATIC STUDY; THEORETICAL STUDY; UNSTABLE MODES; WIGNER APPROXIMATION; ZERO-POINT FLUCTUATIONS;

BIOELECTRIC PHENOMENA; DIPOLE MOMENT; EXPERIMENTS; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; FERROMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC DOMAINS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; SPIN DYNAMICS;

PHASE TRANSITIONS;

EID: 69449090235     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.023622     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. L. Sadler, J. Higbie, S. Leslie, M. Vengalattore, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Nature (London) 443, 312 (2006). 10.1038/nature05094
2. S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, M. Vengalattore, J. D. Sau, M. L. Cohen, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. A 79, 043631 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.043631
3. T. L. Ho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.742
4. T. Ohmi and K. Machida, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 1822 (1998). 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1822
5. R. Barnett, A. Turner, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 180412 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.180412
6. A. Lamacraft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160404 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98. 160404
7. G. I. Mias, N. R. Cooper, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. A 77, 023616 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023616
8. H. Saito, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 75, 013621 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.013621
9. H. Saito, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A 76, 043613 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.043613
10. H. Pu, C. K. Law, S. Raghavan, J. H. Eberly, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.1463
11. M. T. Johnsson and S. A. Haine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 010401 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.010401
12. A. A. Norrie, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A 73, 043617 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.043617
13. C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000).
14. To see this we observe that the requirement of equality of the quantum and the classical distributions is equivalent to the equality of the quantum characteristic function χW (λ, λ) = exp (φ † λ- λ† φ) > = n exp [c n† (un† λ- λ† vn) + c n (vnT λ- λ† un)] > to the classical characteristic function χclassical (λ, λ) = exp (φ† λ- λ† φ) > = n exp [cn† (un† λ- λ† vn) + cn (vnT λ- λ† un)] >. Thus the 2 characteristic functions agree if exp (c n† γ+ c n γ) > = exp (cn γ+ γ cn) > = 2 π exp (-2 |γ| 2).
15. A. Polkovnikov, Phys. Rev. A 68, 053604 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.68. 053604
16. P. Deuar and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 120402 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.120402
17. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
18. T. Garel and S. Doniach, Phys. Rev. B 26, 325 (1982). 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.325
19. K. De'Bell, A. B. MacIssac, and J. P. Whitehead, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 225 (2000). 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.225
20. M. Vengalattore, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 170403 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.170403
21. Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110406 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.110406
22. R. W. Cherng and E. Demler, e-print arXiv:0806.1991.
23. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The art of scientific computing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
24. N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.053602
25. E. G. M. van Kempen, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, D. J. Heinzen, and B. J. Verhaar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.093201
26. A. Widera, F. Gerbier, S. Folling, and T. Gericke, O. Mandel, and I. Bloch, New J. Phys. 8, 152 (2006). 10.1088/1367-2630/8/8/152
27. M. Chang, Q. Qin, W. Zhang, L. You, and M. S. Chapman, Nat. Phys. 1, 111 (2005). 10.1038/nphys153