Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus

Ecology

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2405-2413

  Leisnham, P T ^a,c   Lounibos, L P ^b   O'Meara, G F ^b   Juliano, S A ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Aedes aegypti; Aedes albopictus; Competitive asymmetry; Competitive hierarchies; Fecundity size relationship; Interpopulation divergence; Invasive species; Mosquitoes; Reproductive tactics

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; DIVERGENCE; EXTINCTION; FECUNDITY; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MICROCOSM; MOSQUITO; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

AEDES; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; FERTILITY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

AEDES; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; FERTILITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

AEDES AEGYPTI; AEDES ALBOPICTUS;

EID: 69449084827     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-1569.1     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott, K. L., S. N. J. Greaves, P. A. Ritchie, and P. J. Lester. 2007. Behaviourally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provide insight into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community. Biological Invasions 9:453-463.
2. Armbruster, P., and J. E. Conn. 2006. Geographic variation of larval growth in North American Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99:1234-1243.
3. Armbruster, P., and R. A. Hutchinson. 2002. Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 39:699-704.
4. Azevedo, R. B. R., V. French, and L. Partridge. 1997. Lifehistory consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 150:250-282.
5. Barrera, R. 1996. Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container-inhabiting Aedes mosquitoes. Ecological Entomology 21:117-127. (Pubitemid 27071240)
6. Birungi, J., and L. E. Munstermann. 2002. Genetic structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations based on mitochondrial ND5 sequences: evidence for an independent invasion into Brazil and United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95:125-132.
7. Black, W. C., S. R. Karamjit, B. J. Turco, and D. C. Arroyo. 1989. Laboratory study of competition between United States strains of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 26:260-271.
8. Braks, M. A. H., N. A. Honório, L. P. Lounibos, R. Lourençode-Oliveira, and S. A. Juliano. 2004. Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes in Brazil. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 130-139.
9. Briegel, H. 1990. Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. Journal of Insect Physiology 36:165.
10. Broadie, K. S., and W. E. Bradshaw. 1991. Mechanisms of interference competition in the western tree-hole mosquito, Aedes sierrensis. Ecological Entomology 16:145-154.
11. Byers, J. E. 2000. Competition between two estuarine snails: implications for invasions of exotic species. Ecology 81:1225-1239.
12. Costanzo, K. S., B. Kesavaraju, and S. A. Juliano. 2005. Condition specific competition in container mosquitoes: the role of non-competing life history stages. Ecology 86:3289-3295.
13. Darsie, R. F., Jr., and R. A. Ward. 2005. Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, north of Mexico. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
14. Detinova, T. S. 1962. Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
15. Duyck, P., P. David, G. Junod, C. Brunel, R. Dupont, and S. Quilici. 2006. Importance of competition mechanisms in successive invasions by polyphagous tephritids in La Réunion. Ecology 87:1770-1780. (Pubitemid 44141554)
16. Dye, C. 1984. Competition amongst larval Aedes aegypti: the role of interference. Ecological Entomology 9:355-357.
17. Fox, C. W., and M. E. Czesak. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 45:341-369.
18. Goldberg, D. E., and L. Fleetwood. 1987. Competitive effect and response in four annual plants. Journal of Ecology 75: 1131-1143.
19. Goldberg, D. E., and S. M. Scheiner. 2001. ANOVA and ANCOVA: field competition experiments. Pages 77-98 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
20. Gómez-Mestre, I., and M. Tejedo. 2002. Geographic variation in asymmetric competition: a case study with two larval anuran species Ecology 83:2102-2111.
21. Hatle, J. D., M. C. Crowley, A. L. Andrews, and S. A. Juliano. 2002. Geographic variation of reproductive tactics in lubber grasshoppers. Oecologia 132:517-523.
22. Hawley, W. A. 1988. The biology of Aedes albopictus. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 4(Supplement): 1-40.
23. Joshi, A., and J. N. Thompson. 1995. Alternative routes to the evolution of competitive ability in two competing species. Evolution 49:616-625.
24. Juliano, S. A. 1998. Species introduction and replacement among mosquitoes: interspecific resource competition or apparent competition. Ecology 79:255-268.
25. Juliano, S. A., L. P. Lounibos, and G. F. O'Meara. 2004. A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in south Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion. Oecologia 194:583-593.
26. Juliano, S. A., G. F. O'Meara, J. R. Morrill, and M. M. Cutwa. 2002. Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes. Oecologia 130:458-469.
27. Keller, S. R., and D. R. Taylor. 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecology Letters 11:852-866.
28. Leisnham, P. T., L. M. Sala, and S. A. Juliano. 2008. Geographic variation in adult survival and reproduction of the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Journal of Medical Entomology 45:210-221.
29. Livdahl, T. P., and G. Sugihara. 1984. Non-linear interactions of populations and the importance of estimating per capita rates of change. Journal of Animal Ecology 53:573-580.
30. Lounibos, L. P. 2002. Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annual Review of Entomology 47:233-266.
31. Lounibos, L. P., R. L. Escher, and R. Lourenço-de-Oliveira. 2003. Asymmetric evolution of photoperiodic diapause in temperate and tropical invasive populations of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96:512-518.
32. Moore, C. G., and B. R. Fisher. 1969. Competition in mosquitoes. Density and species ratio effects on growth, mortality, fecundity, and production of growth retardant. Annals of Entomological Society of America 62:1325-1331.
33. Murrell, E. G., and S. A. Juliano. 2008. The role of detritus type in interspecific competition and population distributions of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 45:375-383.
34. O'Meara, G. F., L. F. Evans, Jr., A. D. Gettman, and J. P. Cuda. 1995. Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology 32:554-562.
35. Reznick, D., M. J. Butler, IV, and H. Rodd. 2001. Life history evolution in guppies. VII. The comparative ecology of high- and low-predation environments. American Naturalist 157:12-26.
36. Sakai, A. K., et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Revue of Ecology and Systematics 32:305-332.
37. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS user's guide. Statistics. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
38. Scheiner, S. M. 2001. MANOVA: multiple response variables and multispecies interactions. Pages 99-115 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
39. Siemann, E., and W. E. Rogers. 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecology Letters 4:514-518. (Pubitemid 33105363)
40. Sota, T., and M. Mogi. 1992. Interspecific variation in desiccation survival time of Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquito eggs is correlated with habitat and egg size. Oecologia 90: 353-358.
41. Steinwascher, K. 1984. Egg size variation in Aedes aegypti: relationship to body size and other variables. American Midland Naturalist 112:76-84.
42. Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
43. Travis, J. T. 1996. The significance of geographical variation in species interactions. American Naturalist 148:51-58. (Pubitemid 27206150)
44. Yasuda, H., E. W. Evans, Y. Kajita, K. Urakawa, and T. Takizawa. 2004. Asymetric larval interactions between introduced and indigenous ladybirds in North America. Oecologia 141:722-731. (Pubitemid 40033038)