Making globalization work for the poor: The 2000 white paper reconsidered

Journal of International Development

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 933-937

  Wood, Adrian ^a  

^a DFID   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; GLOBALIZATION; POVERTY;

EID: 6944250186     PISSN: 09541748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1154     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369-1401.
2. Carkovic M, Levine R. 2002. Does Direct Foreign Investment Accelerate Economic Growth? Department of Finance Working Paper, University of Minnesota. http://www.ssrn.com
3. Chang H-J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. Anthem: London.
4. Clemens M, Williamson J. 2004. Why did the tariff-growth correlation change after 1950? Journal of Economic Growth 9 (1): 5-46.
5. Cornia G. 2004. Inequality, growth and poverty: an overview of changes over the last two decades. In Inequality, Growth and Poverty in an Era of Liberalisation and Globalisation, Cornia G (ed.). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 1-54.
6. Dollar D, Kraay A. 2001. Trade, growth and poverty. Policy Research Working Paper 2615, World Bank.
7. Easterly W, Levine R. 2002. Tropics, germs and crops: how endowments influence economic development. NBER Working Paper W9106, National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. Eichengreen B, Leblang D. 2003. Capital account liberalisation and growth: was Mr Mahathir right? International Journal of Finance and Economics 8 (3): 205-224.
9. Fischer R. 2001. The evolution of inequality after trade liberalisation. Journal of Development Economics 66: 555-579.
10. Fontana M, Wood A. 2000. Modelling the effects of trade on women, at work and at home. World Development 28 (7): 1173-1190.
11. Frankel J, Romer D. 1999. Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review 89 (3): 379-399.
12. Hertel T, Ivanic M, Preckel P, Cranfield J. 2004. The earnings effects of multilateral trade liberalisation: implications for poverty. World Bank Economic Review 18: 205-236.
13. Irwin D. 2000. Did late nineteenth century US tariffs promote infant industries? Evidence from the tinplate industry. Journal of Economic History 60: 335-360.
14. McCulloch N, Winters A, Cirera X. 2001. Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: A Handbook. DFID-Centre for Economic Policy Research: London.
15. Ravallion M. 2003. Targeted transfers in poor countries: revisiting the trade-offs and policy options. Social Protection Discussion Paper 0314, World Bank.
16. Redding S, Venables A. 2004. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62: 53-82.
17. Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F. 2004. Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2): 131-165.
18. Williamson J. 2003. Was it Stolper-Samuelson, infant industry or something else? World trade tariffs 1789-1938. NBER Working Paper W9656, National Bureau of Economic Research.
19. Winters A. 2004. Trade liberalisation and economic performance: an overview. Economic Journal 114 (493): F4-F21.
20. Wood A. 1997. Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: the Latin American challenge to East Asian conventional wisdom. World Bank Economic Review 11 (1): 33-57.
21. Wood A. 2002. Globalisation and wage inequalities: a synthesis of three theories, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 138 (1): 54-82.
22. Yanikkaya H. 2003. Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics 72 57-89.