The 'national system of innovation' in historical perspective

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 5-24

  Freeman, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 6944245129     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Amann, R., Berry, M. and Davies, R. W. 1979. Industrial Innovation in the Soviet Union, Newhaven, Yale University Press
2. Antonelli, C., 1994. Technological districts, localized spillovers and productivity growth, International Review of Applied Economics, in press
3. Arcangeli, F., 1993. Local and global features of the learning process, in M. Humbert (ed.), 1993
4. Archibugi, D., and Pinta, M. 1992. ‘The Technological Specialisation of Advanced Countries’, Report to the EC on International Science and Technology Activities, Dordrecht, Kluwer
5. Baba, Y. 1985. ‘Japanese Colour TV Firms. Decision-making from the 1950s to the 1980s’, DPhil dissertation, Brighton, University of Sussex
6. Barker, G. R. and Davies, RW. 1965. The research and development effort of the Soviet Union, in Freeman and Young, 1965
7. Barnett, C. 1988. The Audit of War, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
8. Beer, J. J. 1959. The Emergence of the German Dye Industry, Chicago, University of Illinois Press
9. Bemal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science, London, Routledge and Regan Paul
10. Callon, M. 1993. Variety and irreversibility in networks of technique conception and adoption, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds), 1993
11. Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. 1993. Technological systems and economic performance: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds), 1993
12. Carter, C. F. and Williams, B. R. 1957. Industry and Technical Progress, Oxford, Oxford University Press
13. Chesnais, F. 1992. National systems of innovation, foreign direct investment and the operations of multinational enterprises, in B. A. Lundvall, (ed.), 1992
14. Dosi, G, Freeman, C., Fabiani, S. and Aversi, R. 1992. The diversity of development patterns: on the processes of catching up, forging ahead and falling behind, International Economics Association, Varenna, Italy, October
15. Durlauf, S. and Johnson, P. A. 1992. ‘Local versus Global Convergence across National Economies’, mimeo, Stanford University
16. Edqvist, C. and Lundvall, B.-A. 1993.Chapter on Denmark and Sweden, in E. R. Nelson (ed.), 1993
17. Fagerberg, J. 1992. The home market hypothesis re-examined: the impact of domestic-userproducer interaction in exports, in B-A. Lundvall (ed.) 1992
18. Fleck, J. and White, B. 1987. National policies and patterns of robot diffusion: UK, Japan, Sweden and United States, Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1
19. Foray, D. 1991. The secrets of industry are in the air industrial cooperation and the organisational dynamics of the innovative firm, Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5
20. Foray, D. and Freeman, C. (eds) 1993. Technology and the Wealth of Nations, London, Pinter
21. Freeman, C. 1974. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 1st edn, Harmondsworth, Penguin; 2nd edn 1982 London, Frances Pinter
22. Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London, Frances Pinter
23. Freeman, C. 1994. The economics of technical change, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 18, no. 5, October
24. Freeman, C. and Hagedoom, J. 1992. ‘Convergence and Divergence in the Internationalisation of Technology1, paper for MERIT Conference, University of Limburg
25. Freeman, C. and Young, A. 1965. The Research and Development Effort in Western Europe, North America and the Soviet Union, Paris, OECD
26. Gibbons, M. and Johnston, R. D. 1974. The roles of science in technological innovation, Research Policy, vol. 3, no. 3
27. Gomulka, S. 1990. The Theory of Technological Change and Economic Growth, London, Routledge
28. Graves, A. 1991. ‘International Competitiveness and Technological Development in the World Automobile Industry’, DPhil thesis, Brighton, University of Sussex
29. Grossman, I. and Helpman, E. 1991. Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
30. Grupp, H. and Hofmeyer, O. 1986. A technometric model for the assessment of technological standards and their application to selected technology comparisons, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 30, 123-137
31. Hamilton, A. 1791. ‘Report on the Subject of Manufactures’, reprinted by the US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1913
32. Hobsbawm, E. 1968. Industry and Empire, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson
33. Hollander, S. 1965. The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants, Cambridge, MA, MTT Press
34. Hounshell, D. A. 1992. Continuity and change in the management of industrial research: the DuPont Company 1902-1980, in G. Dosi, R. Giannetti and Toninelli, P. A. (eds), Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective, Oxford, Oxford University Press
35. Hu, Y. S. 1992. Global or transnational corporations are national firms with international operations, Californian Management Review
36. Hughes, T. P. 1989. American Genesis, New York, Viking
37. Humbert, M. (ed.) 1993. The Impact of Globalisation on Europe's Firms and Industries, London, Pinter
38. Irvine, J. and Martin, B. R. 1984. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners, London, Pinter
39. Jewkes, J., Sawers, D. and Stillerman, R. 1958. The Sources of Invention, Macmillan, London
40. Johnson, B. 1992.Institutional learning, in B.-A. Lundvall (ed.), 1992
41. Johnson, H. G. 1975. Technology and Economic Interdependence, London, Macmillan
42. Landes, M. 1970. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
43. List, F. 1841. The National System of Political Economy, English Edition (1904) London, Longman
44. Lundvall, B.-A. 1985. Product innovation and user-producer interaction, Industrial Development Research Senes, vol. 31, Aalborg, Aalborg University Press
45. Lundvall, B.-A. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, in G. Dosi, et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter
46. Lundvall, B.-A. (ed.) 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter
47. Lundvall, B.-A. 1993 User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds), 1993
48. Mansfield, E. 1968. The Economics of Technical Change, New York, WW Norton
49. Mansfield, E. 1971. Research and Innovation in the Modem Corporation, New York, WW Norton
50. Mansfield, E. 1988. Industrial Innovation in Japan and in the United States, Science, vol. 241, 1760-1764
51. Mansfield, E. 1989. The diffusion of industrial robots in Japan and in the United States, Research Policy, vol. 18, 183-192
52. Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics, London, Macmillan Mathias, P. 1969. The First Industrial Nation, London, Methuen
53. Miyazaki, K. 1993. ‘Dynamic Competence Building in Japanese and European Firms: The Case of Opto-electronics’, D.Phil. thesis, University of Sussex
54. Mjoset, L. 1992. The Irish Economy in a Comparative Institutional Perspective, Dublin, National Economic and Social Council
55. Mowery, D. C. 1980. ‘The Emergence and Growth of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing 1899-1946’, PhD dissertation, Stanford University
56. Mowery, D. C. 1983. The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing 1900-1940, Explorations in Economic History, vol. 20, no. 4, October
57. National Science Foundation 1973. Interactions of Science and Technology in the Innovative Process, NSF-667, Washington, DC
58. Nelson, R. R. (ed.) 1962. The Rate and Direction of Innovative Activity, Princeton University Press, NBER
59. Nelson, E. R. (ed.) 1963. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press
60. OECD 1963A. The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities (Frascati Manual), Paris, OECD
61. OECD 1963B. Science, Economic Growth and Government Policy, Paris, OECD OECD 1971. Science, Growth and Society, (Brooks Report), Paris, OECD
62. OECD 1980. Technical Change and Economic Policy, Paris, OECD
63. OECD 1988. New Technologies in the 1990s: A Socio-Economic Strategy (Sundqvist Report), Paris, OECD
64. OECD 1991. Technology and Productivity: The Challenges for Economic Policy, Paris, OECD
65. OECD 1992. Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships, Paris, OECD
66. Ohmae, K. 1990. The Borderless World, New York, Harper
67. Patel, P. 1993. ‘Localised Production of Technology for Global Markets’, mimeo, SPRU, University of Sussex
68. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1991. Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of ‘non-globalisation’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 22, no. 1
69. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1992. The innovative performance of the world’s largest firms: some new evidence, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 2, 91-102
70. Paulinyi, A. 1982. Der technologietransfer fur die Metallbearbeitung und die preussische Gewerbeforderung 1820-1850, in F. Blaich, (Hg), Die Rolle des Staates fur die wtrtschaftliche Entwicklung, Berlin, Blaich
71. Perez, C. 1983. Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social system, Futures, vol. 15, no. 5
72. Piore, M. and Sabel, C. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York, Basic Books
73. Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, Free Press, Macmillan
74. Posner, M. 1961. International trade and technical change, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 13, 323-341
75. Prais, S. J. 1981. Vocational qualifications of the labour force in Britain and Germany, National Institute Economic Review, vol. 98, 47-59
76. Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 5
77. Rothwell, R. 1992. ‘Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s’, SPRU 25th Anniversary, Brighton, University of Sussex, reprinted in R&D Management, vol. 22, no. 3
78. Sako, M. 1992. Contracts, Prices and Trust How the Japanese and British Manage Their Subcontracting Relationships, Oxford, Oxford University Press
79. Saxcnian, A. 1991. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley, Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5
80. Scott, A. J. 1991. The aerospace-electronics industrial complex of Southern California. The formative years 1940-1960, Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5
81. Stokes, D. E. 1993. ‘Pasteur’s Quadrant: A Study in Policy Science Ideas’, mimeo, Princeton University
82. Storper, M. and Harrison, B. 1991. Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: the changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s, Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5
83. Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I. 1986. The new product development game, Harvard Business Review, January/February, 285-305
84. Villaschi, A. F. 1993. ‘The Brazilian National System of Innovation: Opportunities and Constraints for Transforming Technological Dependency’ DPhil Thesis, University of London
85. von Hippel E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, vol. 5, 212-239
86. von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press
87. von Tunzelmann, N. 1994. Technology in the early nineteenth century, in R. C. Floud and D. N. McCloskey (eds), The Economic History of Great Britain, 2nd edn, vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
88. Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D. 1990. The Machine that Changed the World, New York, Rawson Associates (Macmillan)
89. World Bank 1991. World Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press