Information technology systems in general practice medicine in New Zealand

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 117, Issue 1198, 2004, Pages

  Didham, Rebecca ^a   Martin, Isobel ^a   Wood, Richelle ^a   Harrison, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTICE; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEW ZEALAND; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; MANPOWER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REGISTER; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AMBULATORY CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FAMILY PRACTICE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; NEW ZEALAND; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, MEDICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 6944233654     PISSN: 11758716     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Royal College of General Practitioners. General Practice Computerisation. RCGP Information Sheet No. 7; 2003.
2. Kazimirski M, Renaud C, Sawaya L, et al. Computer literacy and electronic medical records. Mississauga, Ontario: The College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2000.
3. Western M, Dwan K, Western J, et al. Computerisation in Australian General Practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2003;32:180-5.
4. Thakurdas P, Coster G, Gurr E, Arroll B. New Zealand general practice computerisation; attitudes and reported behaviour. N Z Med J. 1996;109:419-22.
5. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic Technology: A Spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA. 2003;290:259-64.
6. Hill S. MedTech 32 holds lead in market share. New Zealand Doctor. 2001;June 20:32.
7. Kenealy T, Arroll B, Kenealy H, et al. General practice changes in South Auckland from 1990 to 1999: A threat to continuity of care? N Z Fam Pract. 2002;29:387-390.
8. Brenner B. Is the provision of laboratory results via the internet acceptable to patients? A survey of private patients in a large, specialist gynaecology practice. N Z Med J. 2003;116(1187). URL: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1187/711/
9. Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ. 1995;311:848-52.
10. Trelle S. Accuracy of responses from postal surveys about continuing medical education and information behaviour: experiences from a survey among German diabetologists. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):15.
11. McMahon SR, Iwamoto M, Massoudi MS, et al. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2003;111:299-303.