Measuring entangled qutrits and their use for quantum bit commitment

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Langford, N K ^a   Dalton, R B ^a   Harvey, M D ^a   O'Brien, J L ^a   Pryde, G J ^a   Gilchrist, A ^a   Bartlett, S D ^a   White, A G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM BIT COMMITMENT; QUANTUM STATE TOMOGRAPHY; QUTRITS; SPATIAL MODE ANALYZERS (SMA);

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HOLOGRAMS; IMAGE CODING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; PHOTONS; POLARIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SEMICONDUCTOR LASERS; SINGLE MODE FIBERS; TOMOGRAPHY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 69349107101     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.053601     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. See, e.g., special issue of Quantum Inf. Comput 1 (2001).
2. M. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 90 167906 (2003).
3. R.W. Spekkens et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 012310 (2001).
4. D. F.V. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).
5. R.T. Thew et al., Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303 (2002).
6. R.T. Thew et al., Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 093 (2004).
7. G. Molina-Terriza et al., Opt Commun. 228, 155 (2003).
8. A. Mair et al., Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001).
9. A. Vaziri et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 91 227902 (2003).
10. A. Vaziri et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240401 (2002).
11. Violating Bell's inequality is not a measure of entanglement, as states with different amounts of entanglement and mixture can give the same Bell violation [12].
12. W. J. Munro et al., J. Mod. Opt. 48, 1239 (2001).
13. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1986).
14. A. G. White et al., Phys. Rev. A 65, 012301 (2001).
15. +| - |j〉〈j|(i + 1)/2 - |k〉〈k|(i+1)/2; see M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (CUP, Cambridge, 2000), p. 391.
16. M. J. Padgett and J. Courtial, Opt Lett. 24, 430 (1999).
17. X is the number of counts in the X basis. If exact behavior is required, then Gaussian holograms should be used
18. A. Vaziri et al., J. Opt B Quantum Semiclassical Opt 4, S47 (2002).
19. 0,±l〉)/√2. This is apparent in the output intensity pattern: a displaced charge |l| hologram produces a mode with a single displaced vortex [8]; whereas a hologram for |ξ〉 will produce/analyze a mode with |l| single-charge vortices [20].
20. M. S. Soskin et al., Phys. Rev. A 56, 4064 (1997).
21. A. G. White et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 83, 3103 (1999).
22. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
23. Bρ is the partial trace of the two-qutrit state, so that EOF = 1 for a maximally entangled state. Our EOF was calculated following the minimization algorithm given in [24] using the parametrization for unitaries given in [25]. Only 9 × 9 unitaries were searched, so the figure quoted is an upper bound.
24. K. Audenaert et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 052304 (2001).
25. P. Dita, J. Phys. A 36, 2781 (2003).
26. H.-K. Lo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 78, 3410 (1997).
27. D. Mayers, Phys. Rev. Lett 78, 3414 (1997).
28. By setting to zero terms associated with the zero-photon mode and renormalizing the remainder appropriately.
29. Computer-generated, sinusoidal, phase gratings; diffraction angle of ∼ 0.28° at 670 nm; efficiencies of 20%-30%.