Comparison of correlated proportions based on paired binary data from clustered samples

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 139, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 4206-4212

  Jin, Hua ^a   Lu, Ying ^b,c  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustered data; Correlated proportions; McNemar's test; Non inferiority

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249230754     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berger R.L., and Hsu J.C. Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets. Statistical Science 11 4 (1996) 283-319
2. Bonney G.W. Logistic regression for dependent binary observations. Biometrics 10 (1987) 951-973
3. Chen J. Global tests for analysis of multiple tumor data from animal carcinogenicity experiments. Statistics in Medicine 15 11 (1996) 1217-1225
4. Crowder M.J. Beta-binomial ANOVA for proportions. Applied Statistics 27 (1978) 34-37
5. Donner A., and Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research (2000), Arnold, London
6. Durkalski V.L., et al. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data for a non-inferiority study design. Statistics in Medicine 22 (2003) 279-290
7. Eliasziw M., and Donner A. Application of the McNemar test to non-independent matched pair data. Statistics in Medicine 10 (1991) 1981-1991
8. Haseman J.K., and Kupper L.L. Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34 (1979) 69-76
9. Lachenbruch P., and Lynch C. Assessing screening tests: extensions of McNemar's test. Statistics in Medicine 17 19 (1998) 2207-2217
10. Liang K.Y., and Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1986) 13-22
11. Lu Y., and Bean J.A. On the sample size for studies of bioequivalence based upon McNemar's test. Statistics in Medicine 14 16 (1995) 1831-1839
12. Lu Y., and Malani H.M. Analysis of animal carcinogenicity experiments with multiple tumor types. Biometrics 51 (1995) 73-86
13. Lu Y., Jin H., and Genant H. On the equivalence of two diagnostic tests based on paired observations. Statistics in Medicine 22 19 (2003) 3029-3044
14. Lui K., and Cumberland W. Sample size determination for equivalence test using rate ratio of sensitivity and specificity in paired sample data. Controlled Clinical Trials 22 4 (2001) 373-389
15. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12 (1947) 153-157
16. Morikawa T., and Yoshida M. A useful testing strategy in phase II trials: combined test of superiority and test of equivalence. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 5 (1995) 297-306
17. Nam J.M. Establishing equivalence of two treatments and sample size requirements in matched-pairs design. Biometrics 53 4 (1997) 1422-1430
18. Nam J.M., and Blackwelder C. Analysis of the ratio of marginal probabilities in a matched-pair setting. Statistics in Medicine 21 (2002) 689-699
19. Neumann D.R., et al. Comparison of FDG PET and sestamibi-SPECT in primary hyperparathyroidism. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 37 (1996) 1809-1815
20. Obuchowski N.A. Multi-reader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Academic Radiology 2 (1995) S22-S29
21. Obuchowski N.A. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Statistics in Medicine 17 (1998) 1495-1507
22. Ochi Y., and Prentice R.L. Likelihood inference in a correlated probit regression model. Biometrika 71 (1984) 531-543
23. Paul S.R. Analysis of proportions of affected foetuses in teratological experiments. Biometrics 38 (1982) 361-370
24. Rao J.N.K., and Scott A.J. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 48 (1992) 577-585
25. Tango T. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Statistics in Medicine 17 8 (1998) 891-908
26. Wefer A., et al. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. Journal of Urology 164 2 (2000) 400-404
27. Williams D.A. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 31 (1975) 949-952
28. Zeger S.L., and Liang K.Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42 (1986) 121-130