A transdisciplinary approach to face the plant gene transfer technique: From laboratory to society

Women in biotechnology: Creating interfaces

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 277-284

  Martinelli, Lucia ^a   Marin, Floriana ^a  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

communication; Gene transfer; genetically modified organisms (GMOs); marker genes; public perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249230673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8611-3_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Beck, U. (2001). La societ globale del rischio. Trieste: Asterios.
2. Castelfranchi, Y., & Pitrelli, N. (2007). Come si comunica la scienza? Roma-Bari: Laterza.
3. Dale, E. C., & Ow, D. W. (1991). Gene Transfer with Subsequent Removal of the Selection Gene from the Host Genome. PNAS USA, 88, 10558-10562.
4. Gaskell, G. et al. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 185-194.
5. Greco, P. (2005). Il Modello Venezia. La comunicazione nellera post accademica della scienza. Retrieved September, 2006, from http://ics.sissa.it/ conferences/csIntroduzione.pdf
6. Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998a). The public understanding of science. In G. Wilson et al. (Eds).), Handbook of Science communication (pp. 3-17). London: IOP.
7. Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998b). Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Hare, P. D., & Chua, N.-H. (2002). Excision of selectable marker genes from transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 575-580.
9. Kieffer, F. et al. (2004). Mannose and xylose cannot be used as selectable agents for Vitis vinifera L. transformation. Vitis, 43, 35-39.
10. Marin, F., & Martinelli, L. (2006). The discrete choice analysis as a valuable tool for estimating consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food in Europe. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication on Science and Technology (PCST-9), Seoul, May 17-20, 2006.
11. Martinelli, L., & Mandolino, G. (1994). Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants in grapevine (Vitis rupestris S.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 88, 621-628.
12. Martinelli, L., & Mandolino, G. (2001). Genetic transformation in Vitis. In: Y. P. S. Bajaj (Ed.), Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, transgenic crops II (Vol. 47, pp. 325-338). Berlin: Springer.
13. Martinelli, L. et al. (2002). Stable insertion and expression of the movement protein gene of Grapevine Virus A (GVA) in grape lines (Vitis rupestris S.). Vitis, 41, 189-193.
14. Martinelli, L. et al. (2005a). Genetically modified food and feed: Traceability and labeling in the public debate. Paper presented at the 9th International Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR), Agricultural biotechnology, 10 years later, Ravello, July 6-10, 2005.
15. Martinelli, L. et al. (2005b). European regulation on traceability and labeling of genetically modified food and feed: Analysis on the public debate. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, 2005, 1133.
16. Martinelli, L. et al. (2006). Eco-friendly genes: From scientific research to risk management, ethical issues and communication. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Public Communication on Science and Technology (PCST-9), Seoul, May 17-20, 2006.
17. McFadden, D. (1974a). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic.
18. McFadden, D. (1974b). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303-328.
19. McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds).), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications (pp. 198-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. McFadden, D. (2000). Economic choices. Nobel Prize Lecture, December 8, 2000. Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/ economics/laureates/2000/mcfadden-lecture.pdf
21. McFadden, D., & Ruud, P. A. (1994). Estimation by simulation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 4, 591-608.
22. McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447-470.
23. Reed, J. et al. (2001). Phosphomannose isomerase: An efficient selectable marker for plant transformation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 37, 127-132.
24. Sandman, P. M. (1999). Risk = Hazard + Outrage: Coping with controversy about utility risks. Engineering News-Records, October 4, A19-A23.
25. Savadori, L. et al. (2004). Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis, 24(5), 1289-1299.
26. Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. (2003). The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 125-157.
27. Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689-701.
28. Train, K. (Ed.) (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Wolt, J. D., & Peterson, R. K. D. (2000). Agricultural biotechnology and societal decision making: The role of risk analysis. AgBioForum, 3(1), 39-46.
30. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Zuo, J. et al. (2001). Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 157-161