Post-objective determination of weights of the evaluation factors in public procurement tenders

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 261-267

  Lorentziadis, Panos L ^a  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Auctions bidding; Decision analysis; Multiple criteria analysis

Indexed keywords

AUCTIONS/BIDDING; DECISION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION FACTOR; EVALUATION PROCESS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS; OBJECTIVE METHODS; OPTIMAL BIDDING STRATEGY; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; PUBLIC TENDER; SEALED BIDS; WEIGHT DETERMINATION;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 69249224530     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Addler N., Friedman L., and Sinuany-Stern Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 249-265
2. Angulo-Meza L., and Lins M.P.E. Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 116 (2002) 225-242
3. Borcherding K., Eppel T., and Von Winterfeldt D. Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science 37 12 (1991) 1603-1619
4. Butler J., Morrice D.J., and Mullarkey P.W. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science 47 6 (2001) 800-816
5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research 2 (1978) 429-444
6. Csaki C., and Gelleri P. Conditions and benefits of applying decision technological solutions as a tool to curb corruption within the procurement process: The case of Hungary. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management 11 (2005) 252-259
7. Degraeve Z., Labor E., and Roodhooft F. An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research 125 (2000) 34-58
8. Dulmin R., and Mininno V. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 9 (2003) 177-187
9. Holt G.D. Which contractor selection methodology?. International Journal of Project Management 16 3 (1998) 153-164
10. Holt G.D., Olomolaiye P.O., and Harris F.C. Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 1 3 (1994) 139-148
11. Leenders M.R., Johnson P.F., Flynn A.E., and Fearon H.E. Purchasing and Supply Management (2006), McGraw Hill-Irwin, New York p. 416
12. Li C.C., Fun Y.P., and Hung J.S. A new measure for supplier performance evaluation. IIE Transactions 29 (1997) 753-758
13. Milgrom P. Putting Auction Theory to Work (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK p. 247
14. Narasimhan R., Talluri S., and Mendez D. Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: An empirical approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37 3 (2001) 28-37
15. Ohno T., and Harada Y. Comparison of tendering and contracting systems for public works between Japan, the United States and EU countries. Government Auditing Review - Board of Audit Japan 13 (2006) 49-71
16. Pongpeng J., and Liston J. TenSeM: A multicriteria and multidecision-makers' model in tender evaluation. Construction Management and Economics 21 (2003) 21-30
17. Russell J. Decision models for analysis and evaluation of construction contractors. Construction Management and Economics 10 (1992) 185-202
18. Talluri S., and Narasimhan R. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max-min approach. European Journal of Operations Research 146 (2003) 543-552
19. Weber C.A., and Desai A. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operations Research 90 (1996) 142-155
20. Willis T.H., Huston C.R., and Pohlkamp F. Evaluation measures of just-in-time supplier performance. Production and Inventory Management Journal 2 (1993) 1-5