Vital rate sensitivity analysis as a tool for assessing management actions for the desert tortoise

Biological Conservation

Volumn 142, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2710-2717

  Reed, J Michael ^a   Fefferman, Nina ^b   Averill Murray, Roy C ^c  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Nevada Fish & Wildlife Office   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Elasticity; Head starting; Population viability; Translocation; Turtle

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; AGE STRUCTURE; JUVENILE; MORTALITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POPULATION GROWTH; POPULATION SIZE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRANSLOCATION; TURTLE;

ANIMALIA; GOPHERUS AGASSIZII; TESTUDINES; TESTUDINIDAE;

EID: 69249222491     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Lubow B.C., Thomas L., Corn P.S., Medica P.A., and Marlow R.W. Field trials of line transect methods applied to estimation of desert tortoise abundance. Journal of Wildlife Management 65 (2001) 583-597
2. Beissinger S.R., and Westphal M.I. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62 (1998) 821-841
3. Berry, K.H. (Ed.), 1984. The status of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the United States. Desert Tortoise Council Report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento.
4. Berry, K.H., 1997. Demographic consequences of disease in two desert tortoise populations in California, USA. In: Van Abbema, J. (Ed.), Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Tortoises and Turtles. New York Turtle and Tortoise Society, New York, pp. 91-99.
5. Bjurlin C.D., and Bissonette J.A. Survival during early life stages of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the south-central Mojave desert. Journal of Herpetology 38 (2004) 527-535
6. Boarman, W.I., 2002. Threats to desert tortoise populations: a critical review of the literature. US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Sacramento.
7. Boarman W.I., and Sazaki M. A highway's road-effect zone for desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). Journal of Arid Environments 65 (2006) 94-101
8. Brooks, M.L., 2000. Does protection of desert tortoise habitat generate other ecological benefits in the Mojave desert? In: USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15, 3, pp. 68-73.
9. Brooks, M.L., Lair, B., 2005. Ecological effects of vehicular routes in a desert ecosystem. Report Prepared for the US Geological Survey, Recoverability and Vulnerability of Desert Ecosystems Program. Western Ecological Research Center, Henderson.
10. Caughley G. Analysis of Vertebrate Populations (1977), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
11. Congdon J.D., Dunham A.E., and Van Loben Sels R.C. Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7 (1993) 826-833
12. Crowder L.B., Crouse D.T., Heppell S.S., and Martin T.H. Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations. Ecological Applications 4 (1994) 437-445
13. Curtin A.J., Zug G.R., and Spotila J.R. Longevity and growth strategies of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in two American deserts. Journal of Arid Environments 73 (2009) 463-471
14. Doak D., Kareiva P., and Klepetka B. Modeling population viability for the desert tortoise in the western Mojave desert. Ecological Applications 4 (1994) 446-460
15. Dodd Jr. C.K., and Seigel R.A. Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: are they conservation strategies that work?. Herpetologica 47 (1991) 336-350
16. Enneson J.J., and Litzgus J.D. Using long-term data and a stage-classified matrix to assess conservation strategies for an endangered turtle (Clemmys guttata). Biological Conservation 141 (2008) 1560-1568
17. Ernst C.H., Lovich J.E., and Barbour R.W. Turtles of the Unites States and Canada (1994), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
18. Fefferman N., and Reed J.M. A vital rate sensitivity analysis that is valid for non-stable age distributions and for short-term planning. Journal of Wildlife Management 70 (2006) 649-656
19. Field K.J., Tracy C.R., Medica P.A., Marlow R.W., and Corn P.S. Return to the wild: translocation as a tool in conservation of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Biological Conservation 136 (2007) 232-245
20. Frazer N.B. Sea turtle conservation and halfway technology. Conservation Biology 6 (1992) 179-184
21. Germano D.J. Growth and age at maturity of North American tortoises in relation to regional climates. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72 (1994) 918-931
22. Henen B.T. Seasonal and annual energy budgets of female desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii). Ecology 78 (1997) 283-296
23. Heppell S. Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998 (1998) 367-375
24. Heppell S.S., Crowder L.B., and Crouse D.T. Models to evaluate headstarting as a management tool for long-lived turtles. Ecological Applications 6 (1996) 556-565
25. Karl, E.A., 1998. Reproductive strategies, growth patterns, and survivorship of a long-lived herbivore inhabiting a temporally variable environment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis.
26. Kimball S., and Schiffman P.M. Differing effects of cattle grazing on native and alien plants. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 1681-1693
27. Kristan W.B., and Boarman W.I. Spatial pattern of risk of common raven predation on desert tortoises. Ecology 84 (2003) 2432-2443
28. Longshore K.M., Jaeger J.R., and Sappington J.M. Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) survival at two eastern Mojave Desert sites: death by short-term drought?. Journal of Herpetology 37 (2003) 169-177
29. Mills L.S., and Lindberg M.S. Sensitivity Analysis to Evaluate the Consequences of Conservation Actions. In: Beissinger S.D., and McCullough D.R. (Eds). Population Viability Analysis (2002), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 338-366
30. Mills L.S., Doak D.F., and Wisdom M.J. The reliability of conservation actions based on elasticity analysis of matrix models. Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 815-829
31. Mitrus S. Headstarting in European pond turtles (Emys orbicularis): does it work?. Amphibia-Reptilia 26 (2005) 333-341
32. Morafka, D.J., 1994, Neonates: missing links in the life histories of North American tortoises. In: Bury, R.B., Germano D.J. (Eds.), Biology of North American Tortoises. National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research 13, Washington, DC, pp. 161-173.
33. Mueller J.M., Sharp K.R., Zander K.K., Rakestraw D.L., Rautenstrauch K.R., and Lederle P.E. Size-specific fecundity of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Journal of Herpetology 32 (1998) 313-319
34. Nagy, K.A., Hillard, L.S. Dickson, S.D., Morafka, D.J., 2007. Head-starting desert tortoises: irrigation and yearling releases at Edwards Air Force Base. In: Desert Tortoise Council Symposium, Abstract.
35. Nussear, K.E., 2004. Mechanistic investigation of the distributional limits of the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.
36. Peterson C.C. Different rates and causes of high mortality in 2 populations of the threatened desert tortoise Gopherus agassizii. Biological Conservation 70 (1994) 101-108
37. Reed J.M., Elphick C.S., and Oring L.W. Life-history and viability analysis of the endangered Hawaiian stilt. Biological Conservation 84 (1998) 35-45
38. Reed J.M., Mills L.S., Dunning Jr. J.B., Menges E.S., McKelvey K.S., Frye R., Beissinger S., Anstett M.-C., and Miller P. Emerging issues in population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 16 (2002) 7-19
39. Seigel R.A., and Dodd Jr. C.K. Translocation of amphibians: proven management method or experimental technique?. Conservation Biology 16 (2002) 552-554
40. Tracy, C.R., Averill-Murray, R., Boarman, W.I., Delehanty, D., Heaton, J., McCoy, E., Morafka, D., Nussear, K., Hagerty, B., Medica, P., 2005. Desert Tortoise Recovery Plan Assessment. Report to US Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada.
41. Tracy C.R., Nussear K.E., Esque T.C., Dean-Bradley K., Tracy C.R., DeFalco L.A., Castle K.T., Zimmerman L.C., Espinoza R.E., and Barber A.M. The importance of physiological ecology in conservation biology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46 (2006) 1191-1205
42. Turner F.B., Hayden P., Burge B.L., and Roberson J.B. Egg production by the desert tortoise Gopherus agasizii in California. Herpetologica 42 (1986) 93-104
43. Turner, F.B., Berry, K.H., Randall, D.C., White, G.C., 1987. Population ecology of the desert tortoise at Goffs, California, 1983-1986. Report to Southern California Edison Company No. 87-RD-81.
44. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1990. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise. Federal Register 55, pp. 12178-12191.
45. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994. Desert tortoise (Mojave population) Recovery Plan. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
46. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2008. Draft revised recovery plan for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). US Fish and Wildlife Service, California and Nevada Region, Sacramento. California.
47. Wallis I.R., Henen B.T., and Nagy K.A. Egg size and annual egg production by female desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii): the importance of food abundance, body size, and date of egg shelling. Journal of Herpetology 33 (1999) 394-408
48. Wisdom M.J., Mills L.S., and Doak D.F. Life-stage simulation analysis: estimating vital rate effects on population growth for species conservation. Ecology 81 (2000) 628-641