The question with respect to the significance of the dependencies among criteria is what are the rankings and how they are taken into account to help make the decision;À propos de la signification des dépendances entre critères: Quelle place et quels modes de prise en compte pour l'aide à la décision?

RAIRO - Operations Research

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 255-275

  Bernard, R O Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Choquet integral; Dependencies between criteria; ELECTRE methods; Interactive procedures; Preference modelling

Indexed keywords

INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

CHOQUET INTEGRAL; DEPENDENCIES BETWEEN CRITERIA; ELECTRE METHODS; INTERACTIVE PROCEDURES; PREFERENCE MODELLING;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 69249221607     PISSN: 03990559     EISSN: 28047303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/ro/2009014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. S. Angilelia, S. Greco, F. Lamantia and B. Matarazzo, Assessing non-additive utility for multicriteria decision aid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158 (2004) 734-744.
2. A.R. Azibi, Construction de critères en aide à la décision : Aspects méthodologiques, techniques et pratiques, Université Paris-Dauphine, Thèse de doctorat en informatique (2003).
3. A.R. Azibi and D. Vanderpooten, Construction of rule-based assignment models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138 (2002) 274-293.
4. R. Bisdorff, Logical foundations of multicriteria preference aggregation, in Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria - Essays in Honor of Bernard Roy, edited by D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, P. Perny, R. Slowiǹski, D. Vanderpooten and P. Vincke. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001) 379-403.
5. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis - State of the Art Surveys. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. (2005)
6. J. Figueira, S. Greco and B. Roy, ELECTRE methods with interaction between criteria: An extension of the concordance index, Université Paris-Dauphine, Cahier du LAMSADE No 242 (2006).
7. C. Gonzales and P. Perny, GAI Networks for Decision Making under Certainty, in Proc. of the 19th Interntional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling (2005) 100-105.
8. M. Grabisch, The application of a fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89 (1996) 445-457.
9. M. Grabisch, Une approche constructive de la décision multicritère, Traitement du Signal 22 (4) (2005).
10. M. Grabisch, Evaluation subjective, in Concepts et méthodes pour l'aide à la décision 3 : Analyse multicritère, edited by D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot and H. Prade. Lavoisier, Paris (2006) 179-239.
11. M. Grabisch and C. Labreuche, Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA, in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis State of the Art Surveys, edited by J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. (2005) 563-608.
12. M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche and J.C. Vansnick, On the extension of pseudo Boolean function for the interacting bipolar criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 148 (2003) 28-47.
13. M. Grabisch, H.T. Nguyen and E.A. Walker, Fundamentals of uncertainty calculi, with applications to fuzzy inference. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995).
14. M. Grabisch and P. Perny, Agrégation multicritère, in Logique floue, principes, aide à la décision, edited by B. Bouchon-Meunier and C. Marsala. Hermès, Paris (2003) 81-120.
15. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo and R. Slowinski, The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM, in Multicriteria Decision Making - Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, edited by T. Gal, T.J. Stewart and T. Hanne. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999) 14-1-14-59.
16. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo and R. Slowinski, Conjoint measurement and rough set approach for multicriteria sorting problems in presence of ordinal criteria, in A-MCD-A - Aide Multicritère à la Décision - Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, edited by A. Colorni, M. Paruccini and B. Roy. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR Report 19808 EN (2001) 117-144.
17. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo and R. Slowinski, Decision rule approach, in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis - State of the Art Surveys, edited by J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. (2005) 507-561.
18. R.L. Keeney and F. Raiffa, Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons (1976).
19. C. Labreuche and M. Grabisch, The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137 (2003) 11-26.
20. H. Le Boulanger and B. Roy, L'entreprise face à la sélection des projets de recherche : La méthodologie en usage dans le groupe SEMA, in Rationalisation des choix budgétaires sous la dir d'un groupe de spécialistes animé par J. Agard, Monographies de Recherche Opérationnelle 112. Dunod, Paris (1970) 175-205.
21. J.L. Marichal and M. Roubens, Determination of weights of interactive criteria from a reference set, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 124 (2000) 641-650.
22. A. Rico, Modélisation des préférences pour l'aide à la décision par l'intégrale de Sugeno, thèse de doctorat, Université Paris I, France (2002).
23. B. Roy, Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision. Paris, Economica (1985).
24. B. Roy, Meaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision making. Eur. J Oper. Res. 31 (1987) 297-303.
25. B. Roy, Double pondération pour calculer une moyenne : Pourquoi et comment ? RAIRO Oper. Res. 41 (2007) 125-139.
26. B. Roy and D. Bouyssou, Aide multicritère à la décision : Méthodes et cas. Economica, Paris (1993).
27. J. Stefanowski and D. Vanderpooten, A general two-stage approach to inducing rules from examples, in Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Proc. of the International Workshop RSKD'93, Banff, Canada, edited by W. Ziarko. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1994) 317-325.
28. J. Stefanowski and D. Vanderpooten, Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16, 1 (2001) 13-27.