Does productivity impact the stability of rorschach scores?

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 480-493

  Sultan, Serge ^a   Meyer, Gregory J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DATA ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

EID: 69249214043     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223890903088693     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 411-421.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Chiccetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
5. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 46, 393-429.
7. Dawes, R. (1999). Two methods for studying the incremental validity of a Rorschach variable. Psychological Assessment, 11, 297-302.
8. Dawes, R. M. (2001). Incremental validity of the Ego Impairment Index: It's fine when it's there. Psychological Assessment, 13, 408-409.
9. Dean, K. L., Viglione, D. J., Perry, W., & Meyer, G. J. (2007). A method to optimize the response range while maintaining Rorschach Comprehensive System Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 149-161.
10. Exner, J. E., Jr. (1988). Problems with brief Rorschach protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 640-647.
11. Exner, J. E., Jr. (1992). R in Rorschach research: A ghost revisited. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 245-251.
12. Exner, J.E., Jr. (2003). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System: Vol.1. Basic foundations (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13. Fiske, D. W., & Baughman, E. E. (1953). Relations between Rorschach scoring categories and the total number of responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 25-32.
14. Garson, G. D. (2008). "Regression analysis," from Statnotes: Topics in multi-variate analysis. Retrieved July 18, 2008, from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/statnote.htm
15. Grønnerød, C. (2003). Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 272-293.
16. Holtzman, W. H., Thorpe, J. S., Swartz, J. D., & Herron, E. W. (1961). Inkblot perception and personality. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
17. Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Whither the Rorschach? An analysis of evidence. Psychological Assessment, 13, 472-485.
18. Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15, 446-455.
19. Kalter, N., & Marsden, G. (1970). Response productivity in Rorschach research: A caution on method. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 34, 10-15.
20. Kinder, B. N. (1992). The problems of R in clinical settings and in research: Suggestions for the future. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 252-259.
21. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.
22. Lis, A., Parolin, L., Calvo, V., Zennaro, A., & Meyer, G. J. (2007). The impact of administration and inquiry on Rorschach Comprehensive System protocols in a national reference sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, S193-S200.
23. Meyer, G. J. (1992). Response frequency problems in the Rorschach: Clinical and research implications with suggestions for the future. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 231-244.
24. Meyer, G. J. (1993). The impact of response frequency on the Rorschach constellation indices and on their validity with diagnostic and MMPI-2 criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 153-180.
25. Meyer, G. J. (1997). On the integration of personality assessment methods: The Rorschach and the MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 297-330.
26. Meyer, G. J., & Archer, R. P. (2001). The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go? Psychological Assessment, 13, 486-502.
27. Meyer, G. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Baxter, D., Exner, J. E., Jr., Fowler, J. C., Piers, C. C., et al. (2002). An examination of interrater reliability for scoring the Rorschach Comprehensive System in eight data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 219-274.
28. Meyer, G. J., Mihura, J. L., & Smith, B. L. (2005). The interclinician reliability of Rorschach interpretation in four data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 296-314.
29. Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., & Exner, J. E., Jr. (2001). Superiority of Form% over Lambda for research on the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 68-75.
30. Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Ordnuff, S. R., Freedenfeld, R., Kelsey, R. M., & Critelli, J. (1994). Object relations of sexually abused female subjects: A TAT analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 223-228.
32. Perry, W. (2001). Incremental validity of the Ego Impairment Index: A reexamination of Dawes (1999). Psychological Assessment, 13, 403-407.
33. Perry, W. (2003). Let's call the whole thing off: A response to Dawes (2001). Psychological Assessment, 15, 582-585.
34. Perry, W., Moore, D., & Braff, D. (1995). Gender differences on thought disturbance: Measures among schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 45-67.
35. Provalis Research. (2008). Italassi v1.1 interaction viewer. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.provalisresearch.com/ITALASSI/ITALASSI.php
36. Sultan, S., Andronikof, A., Fouques, D., Lemmel, G., Mormont, C., Réveillère, C., et al. (2004). Vers des normes francophones pour le Rorschach en système intégré [Towards French language norms for the Rorschach Comprehensive System]. Psychologie Française, 49, 7-24.
37. Sultan, S., Andronikof, A., Revéillère, C., & Lemmel, G. (2006). A Rorschach stability study in a non-patient adult sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 330-348.
38. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
39. Viglione, D. J., & Taylor, N. (2003). Empirical support for interrater reliability of Rorschach Comprehensive System coding. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 111-121.
40. Wagner, E. E., Young, G. R., & Wagner, C. F. (1992). Rorschach blends, IQ, and the effect of R. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 185-188.
41. Wood, J. M., Krishnamurthy, R., & Archer, R. P. (2003). Three factors of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach and their relationship to Wechsler IQ scores in an adolescent sample. Assessment, 10, 259-265.