Technology shocks around the world

Review of Economic Dynamics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 592-607

  Dupaigne, Martial ^a   Fève, Patrick ^b  

^a TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

^b Toulouse School of Economics   (France)

Author keywords

Labor input; Multi country economy; Technology shocks; Vector autoregressions

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249212405     PISSN: 10942025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2008.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Basu S., Fernald J., and Kimball M. Are technology improvements contractionary?. American Economic Review 96 5 (2006) 1418-1448
2. Baxter M., and Crucini M. Explaining saving investment correlation. American Economic Review 83 (1993) 416-435
3. Blanchard O., and Quah D. The dynamic effects of aggregate supply and demand disturbances. American Economic Review 79 4 (1989) 655-673
4. Bordo, M.D., Helbling, T., 2003. Have national business cycles become more synchronized? Working Paper 10130. NBER
5. Canova F., Ciccarelli M., and Ortega E. Similarities and convergence in g-7 cycles. Journal of Monetary Economies 54 3 (2007) 850-878
6. Chang Y., and Hong J.H. Do technological improvements in the manufacturing sector raise employment?. American Economic Review 96 1 (2006) 352-368
7. Chari V., Kehoe P.J., and McGrattan E. Are structural vars with long-run restrictions useful in developing business cycle theory?. Journal of Monetary Economics 55 8 (2008) 1337-1352
8. Christiano L.J., Eichenbaum M., and Vigfusson R.J. Assessing structural vars. In: Acemoglu D., Rogoff K., and Woodford M. (Eds). NBER Macroeconomics Annual vol. 21 (2006)
9. Cooley T., and Dwyer M. Business cycle analysis without much theory: A look at structural vars. Journal of Econometrics 83 1-2 (1998) 57-88
10. Cooley T., and Prescott E. Economic growth and business cycles. In: Cooley T. (Ed). Frontiers of Business Cycle Research (1995), Princeton University Press (Chapter 1)
11. Dupaigne M., Fève P., and Matheron J. Avoiding pitfalls in using structural vars to estimate economic models. Review of Economic Dynamics 10 2 (2007) 238-255
12. Erceg C., Guerrieri L., and Gust C. Can long-run restrictions identify technology shocks?. Journal of the European Economic Association 3 6 (2005) 1237-1278
13. Faust J., and Leeper E. When do long-run identifying restrictions give reliable results?. Journal of Business Economics and Statistics 15 3 (1997) 345-353
14. Francis N.R., and Ramey V.A. Is the technology-driven real business cycle hypothesis dead? Shocks and aggregate fluctuations revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 52 8 (2005) 1379-1399
15. Galí J. Technology, employment and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?. American Economic Review 89 1 (1999) 249-271
16. Galí J. Trends in hours, balanced growth, and the role of technology in the business cycle. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 87 4 (2005) 459-486
17. Galí J., and Rabanal P. Technology shocks and aggregate fluctuations: How well does the rbc model fit postwar us data?. In: Gertler M., and Rogoff K. (Eds). NBER Macroeconomics Annual (2004) 225-288
18. Kose A., Otrok C., and Whiteman C.H. International business cycles: World, region, and country-specific factors. American Economic Review 93 4 (2003) 1216-1239
19. Kose A., Otrok C., and Whiteman C.H. Understanding the evolution of world business cycles. Journal of International Economics 75 1 (2008) 110-130
20. Levin A., Lin C.F., and Chu C.S.J. Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (2002)
21. Marchetti D.J., and Nucci F. Price stickiness and the contractionary effect of technology shocks. European Economic Review 49 5 (2005) 1137-1163
22. Moon H.R., and Perron B. Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics 122 (2004)
23. Rabanal, P., Rubio-Ramírez, J., Tuesta, V., 2008. Cointegrated tfp processes and international business cycles. Working paper. La Caixa
24. Stock J.H., and Watson M.W. Understanding changes in international business cycle dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association 3 5 (2005) 968-1006