Developmental changes in spatial distribution of in vivo fluorescence and epidermal UV absorbance over Quercus petraea leaves

Annals of Botany

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 621-633

  Meyer, S ^a   Louis, J ^a   Moise, N ^b   Piolot, T ^c   Baudin, X ^c   Cerovic, Z G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c INSTITUT JACQUES MONOD   (France)

Author keywords

Blue green fluorescence; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Epidermis; Flavonoids; Leaf development; Microscopic imaging; Polyphenols; Quercus petraea

Indexed keywords

ABSORBANCE; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; DECIDUOUS TREE; FLUORESCENCE; HETEROGENEITY; LEAF; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; PIGMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECTROSCOPY;

ARTICLE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; OAK; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT LEAF; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT LEAVES; QUERCUS; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

QUERCUS PETRAEA;

EID: 69249209758     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp144     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agati G, Pinelli P, Ebner SC, Romani A, Cartelat A, Cerovic ZG. 2005. Non destructive evaluation of anthocyanins in olive (Olea euopaea) fruits by in situ chlorophyll fluorescence spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 53: 1354-1363.
2. Avery GS. 1932. Structure and development of the tobacco leaf. American Journal of Botany 20: 565-592.
3. Bate-Smith EC. 1962. The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. Journal Linnean Society -Botany 58: 95-175.
4. Bidel LPR, Meyer S, Goulas Y, Cadot Y, Cerovic ZG. 2007. Responses of epidermal phenolic compounds to light acclimation: in vivo qualitative and quantitative assessment using chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra in leaves of three woody species. Journal of Photochemical and Photobiology B. Biology 88: 163-179.
5. Bilger W, Veit M, Schreiber L, Schreiber U. 1997. Measurement of leaf epi-dermal transmittance of UV radiation by chlorophyll fluorescence. Physiologia Plantarum 101: 754-763.
6. Bilger W, Johnsen T, Schreiber U. 2001. UV-excited chlorophyll fluor-escence as a tool for the assessment of UV-protection by the epidermis of plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 2007-2014.
7. Bringe K, Schumader CFA, Schmitz-Eiberger M, Steiner U, Oerke E-C. 2006. Ontogenetic variation in chemical and physical characteristics of adaxial apple leaf surfaces. Phytochemistry 67: 161-170.
8. Buschmann C. 2007. Variability and application of the chlorophyll fluor-escence emission ratio red/far-red of leaves. Photosynthesis Research 92 : 261-271.
9. Buschmann C, Lichtenthaler HK. 1998. Principles and characteristics of multi-colour fluorescence imaging of plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 152: 297-314.
10. Bussotti F, Agati G, Desotgiu R, Matteini P, Tani C. 2005. Ozone foliar symptoms in woody plants assessed with ultrastructural and fluorescence analysis. New Phytologist 166: 941-955.
11. Caldwell MM, Robberecht R, Flint SD. 1983. Internal filters: prospects for UV-acclimation in higher plants. Physiologia Plantarum 58: 445-450.
12. Cartelat A, Cerovic ZG, Goulas Y, et al. 2005. Optically assessed contents of leaf polyphenolics and chlorophyll as indicators of nitrogen deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Research 91: 35-49.
13. Cerovic ZG, Samson G, Morales F, Tremblay N, Moya I. 1999. Ultraviolet-induced fluorescence for plant monitoring: present state and prospects. Agronomie: Agriculture and Environment 19: 543-578.
14. Cerovic ZG, Ounis A, Cartelat A, et al. 2002. The use of chlorophyll fluor-escence excitation spectra for the non-destructive in situ assessment of UV-absorbing compounds in leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1663-1676.
15. Cerovic ZG, Moise N, Agati G, Latouche G, Ben Ghozlen N, Meyer S. 2008. New portable optical sensors for the assessment of winegrape phenolic maturity based on berry fluorescence. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21: 650-654.
16. Coley PD, Barone JA. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 305-335.
17. Covelo F, Gaillardo A. 2001. Temporal variation in total leaf phenolics concentration of Quercus robur in forested and harvested stands in northwestern Spain. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 1262-1269.
18. Day TA, Martin G, Vogelmann TC. 1993. Penetration of UV-B radiation in foliage - evidence that the epidermis behaves as a non-uniform filter. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 735-741.
19. DeLucia EH, Day TA, Vogelmann TC. 1992. Ultraviolet-B and visible light penetration into needles of two species of subalpine conifers during foliar development. Plant, Cell & Environment 15: 921-929.
20. Esau K. 1953. Plant anatomy. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons. Gond V, de Pury DGG, Veroustraete F, Ceulemans R. 1999. Seasonal variations in leaf area index, leaf chlorophyll, and water content; scaling-up to estimate fAPAR and carbon balance in a multilayer, multispecies temperate forest. Tree Physiology 19: 673-679.
21. Goulas Y, Cerovic ZG, Cartelat A, Moya I. 2004. Dualex: a new instrument for field measurements of epidermal ultraviolet absorbance by chlorophyll fluorescence. Applied Optics 43: 4488-4496.
22. Hartley RD, Harris PJ. 1981. Phenolic constituents of the cell walls of dico-tyledons. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 9: 189-203.
23. Hughes NM, Morley CB, Smith WK. 2007. Coordination of anthocyanin decline and photosynthetic maturation in juvenile leaves of three deciduous tree species. New Phytologist 175: 675-685.
24. Karabourniotis G, Kotsabassidis D, Manetas Y. 1995. Trichome density and its protective potential against ultraviolet-B radiation damage during leaf development. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 376-383.
25. Kim MS, McMurtrey JE, Mulvh CL, Daughtry CST, Chappelle EW, Chen YR. 2001. Steady-state multispectral fluorescence imaging system for plant leaves. Applied Optics 40: 157-166.
26. Kleiner KW, Rafa KF, Dickson RE. 1999. Partitioning of 14C-labeled photo-synthate to allelochemicals and primary metabolites in source and sink leaves of aspen: evidence for secondary metabolic turnover. Oecologia 119: 408-418.
27. Kolb CA, Pfündel EE. 2005. Origins of non-linear and dissimilar relationships between epidermal UV absorbance and UV absorbance of extracted phenolics in leaves of grapevine and barley. Plant, Cell & Environment 25 : 580-590.
28. Lang M, Lichtenthaler HK. 1991. Changes in the blue-green and red fluorescence-emission spectra of beech leaves during the autumnal chlorophyll breakdown. Journal of Plant Physiology 138: 550-553.
29. Lang M, Stober F, Lichtenthaler H. 1991. Fluorescence emission spectra of leaves and plant constituents. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 30 : 333-347.
30. Lang M, Lichtenthaler HK, Sowinska M, Summ P, Hiesel F. 1994. Blue, green and red fluorescence signatures and images of tobacco leaves. Botanica Acta 107: 230-236.
31. Lenk S, Buschmann C. 2006. Distribution of UV-shielding of the epidermis of sun and shade leaves of the beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) as monitored by multi-colour fluorescence imaging. Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 1273-1283.
32. Lenk S, Buschmann C, Pfündel EE. 2007. In vivo assessing flavonols in white grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Blanc) of different degrees of ripeness using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Functional Plant Biology 34: 1092-1104.
33. Lichtenthaler H. 1987. Chlorophyll fluorescence signatures of leaves during the autumnal chlorophyll breakdown. Journal of Plant Physiology 131: 101-110.
34. Louis J, Cerovic ZG, Moya I. 2006. Quantitative study of fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of bean leaves. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 85: 65-71.
35. Maunoury-Danger F. 2007. Etude de la signature isotopique du carbone (d13C) du CO2 respiré et du cerne en relation avec le fonctionnement de l'arbre. Theèse de doctorat, Univ Paris-Sud.
36. Meyer S, Cartelat A, Moya I, Cerovic ZG. 2003. UV-induced blue-green and far-red fluorescence along wheat leaves: a potential signature of leaf ageing. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 757-769.
37. Niinemets U, Kull O, Tenhunen JD. 2004. Within-canopy variation in the rate of development of photosynthetic capacity is proportional to integrated quantum flux density in temperate deciduous trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 293-313.
38. Pfündel EE, Ben Ghozlen N, Meyer S, Cerovic ZG. 2007. Investigating UV screening in leaves by two different types of portable UV fluorimeters reveals in vivo screening by anthocyanins and carotenoids. Photosynthesis Research 93: 205-221.
39. Ruhland CT, Day TA. 1996. Changes in UV-B radiation screening effectiveness with leaf age in Rhododendron maximum. Plant, Cell & Environment 19 : 740-746.
40. Salminen JP, Roslin T, Karonen M, Sinkkonen J, Pihlaja K, Pulkkinen P. 2004. Seasonal variation in the content of hydrolyzable tannins, flavonoid glycosides, and proanthocyanidins in oak leaves. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 1693-1711.
41. Subhash N, Wenzel O, Lichtenthaler H. 1999. Changes in blue-green and chlorophyll fluorescence emission and fluorescence ratios during senescence of tobacco plants. Remote Sensing and Environment 69: 215-223.
42. Vogelmann TC, Bornman JF, Yates DJ. 1996. Focusing of light by epider-mal cells. Physiologia Plantarum 98: 43-56.
43. Wiermann R. 1981. Secondary plant products and cell and tissue differentiation. In: Stumpf PK, Conn EE. eds. The biochemistry of plants. London: Academic Press, 85-116.