Fish movement and habitat use depends on water body size and shape

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 83-91

  Woolnough, D A ^a,c   Downing, J A ^a   Newton, T J ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UPPER MIDWEST ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^c TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Allometric theory; Ecosystem size; Movement; Predictive theory; Spatial scale

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249154732     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: 16000633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00326.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akçakaya, H.R. 2003. Viability analyses with habitat-based metapopulation models. Population Ecology 42 : 45 53.
2. Baxter, C.V., Frissell, C.A. Hauer, F.R. 1999. Geomorphology, logging roads and the distribution of bull trout spawning in a forested river basin: implications for management and conservation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128 : 854 867.
3. Boisclair, D. Tang, M. 1993. Empirical analysis of the influence of swimming pattern on the net energetic cost of swimming in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 42 : 169 183.
4. Breau, C. Grant, J.W.A. 2002. Manipulating territory size via vegetation structure: optimal size of area guarded by the convict cichlid (Pisces, Cichlidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 80 : 376 380.
5. Carlsson, J. Carlsson, J.E.L. 2002. Micro-scale distribution of brown trout: an opportunity for kin selection? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 11 : 234 239.
6. Chase, J.M., Abrams, P.A., Grover, J.P., Diehl, S., Chesson, P., Holt, R.D., Richards, S.A., Nisbet, R.M. Case, T.J. 2002. The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecology Letters 5 : 302 315.
7. Downing, J.A., Prairie, Y.T., Cole, J.J., Duarte, C.M., Tranvik, L.J., Striegl, R.G., McDowell, W.H., Kortelainen, P., Caraco, N.F., Melack, J.M. Middleburg, J. 2006. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnology and Oceanography 51 : 2388 2397.
8. Englund, G. Krupa, J.J. 2000. Habitat use by crayfish in stream pools: influence of predators, depth and body size. Freshwater Biology 43 : 75 83.
9. Fausch, K.D., Torgersen, C.E., Baxter, C.V. Li, H.W. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52 : 483 498.
10. Gerking, S.D. 1959. The restricted movement of fish populations. Biological Review 34 : 221 242.
11. Grant, J.W.A., Steingrimsson, S.O., Keeley, E.R. Cunjak, R.A. 1998. Implications of territory size for the measurement and prediction of salmonid abundance in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55 : 181 190.
12. Grossi, L., Patil, G.P. Taillie, C. 2004. Statistical selection of perimeter-area models for patch mosaics in multiscale landscape analysis. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 11 : 165 181.
13. Gujarati, D.N. 2003. Basic econometrics. Dubuque : McGraw-Hill.
14. Guo, Q., Brown, J.H., Valone, T.J. Kachman, S.D. 2000. Constraints of seed size on plant distribution and abundance. Ecology 81 : 2149 2155.
15. Haddad, N.M., Bowne, D.R., Cunningham, A., Danielson, B.J., Levey, D.J., Sargent, S. Spira, T. 2003. Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84 : 609 615.
16. Haskell, J.P., Ritchie, M.E. Olff, H. 2002. Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges. Nature (London) 418 : 527 529.
17. Hassell, M.P. 2000. Host-parasitoid population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 69 : 543 566.
18. Hayne, D.W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30 : 1 17.
19. Hilderbrand, R.H. Kershner, J.L. 2000. Movement patterns of stream-resident cutthroat trout in Beaver Creek, Idaho-Utah. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129 : 1160 1170.
20. Holland, J.D., Fahrig, L. Cappuccino, N. 2005. Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat-beetle interactions. Oikos 110 : 101 108.
21. Kelt, D.A. Van Vuran, D. 1999. Energetic constraints and the relationship between body size and home range area in mammals. Ecology 80 : 337 340.
22. Lindeman, R.L. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23 : 399 417.
23. Macdonald, D.W. Rushton, S. 2003. Modelling space use and dispersal of mammals in real landscapes: a tool for conservation. Journal of Biogeography 30 : 607 620.
24. Minns, C.K. 1995. Allometry of home range size in lake and river fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52 : 1499 1508.
25. Moorcroft, P.R., Lewis, M.A. Crabtree, R.L. 1999. Home range analysis using a mechanistic home range model. Ecology 80 : 1656 1665.
26. Nathan, R., Perry, G., Cronin, J.T., Strand, A.E. Cain, M.L. 2003. Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103 : 261 273.
27. Ohlberger, J., Staaks, G., Van Dijk, P.L.M. Hölker, F. 2005. Modelling energetic costs of fish swimming. Journal of Experimental Zoology 202A : 657 664.
28. Ovidio, M., Enders, E.C., Hallot, E.J., Roy, M.L., Philippart, J.-C., Petit, F. Roy, A.G. 2007. Mobility and home-range use of Atlantic salmon parr over short time scales. Aquatic Living Resources 20 : 95 101.
29. Pearson, M.P. Healey, M.C. 2003. Life-history characteristics of the endangered salish sucker (Catostomus sp.) and their implications for management. Copeia 2003 : 759 768.
30. Pepin, P. 1993. An appraisal of the size-dependent mortality hypothesis for larval fish: comparison of a multispecies study with an empirical review. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50 : 2166 2174.
31. Peters, R.H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Toronto : Cambridge, pp. 329
32. Petersen, I. Wroblewski, J.S. 1984. Mortality rate of fishes in the pelagic ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41 : 1117 1120.
33. Powell, R.A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In : Boitani, B. Fuller, T.K., eds Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. New York : Columbia University Press, pp. 65 110.
34. Rogers, C.E. McCarty, J.P. 2000. Climate change and ecosystems of the mid-Atlantic region. Climate Research 14 : 235 244.
35. Ruggiero, A. Kitzberger, T. 2004. Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range. Ecography 27 : 401 416.
36. Schlosser, I.J. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41 : 704 712.
37. Schrank, A.J. Rahel, F.J. 2004. Movement patterns in inland cutthroat trout: management and conservation implications. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61 : 1528 1537.
38. Scott, W.B. Crossman, E.J. 1998. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Toronto : Galt House Publications Ltd.
39. Strahler, A.N. 1952. Hypsometric (area altitude) analysis of erosional topology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 63 : 1117 1142.
40. Tear, T.H., Scott, M., Hayward, P.H. Griffith, B. 1995. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data? Conservation Biology 9 : 182 195.
41. Tyler, J.A. Brandt, S.B. 2001. Do spatial models of growth rate potential reflect fish growth in a heterogeneous environment? A comparison of model results. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 10 : 43 56.
42. Warren, M.L.J. Pardew, M.G. 1998. Road crossings as barriers to small-stream fish movement. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127 : 637 644.
43. Woodward, G., Ebenman, B., Emmerson, M., Montoya, J.M., Olesen, J.M., Valido, A. Warren, P.H. 2005. Body size in ecological networks. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6 : 402 409.
44. Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Toronto : Prentice Hall.