Spectral representation of the three-body Coulomb problem: Perspectives for highly doubly excited states of helium

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages

  Eiglsperger, Johannes ^a   Piraux, Bernard ^b   Madroñero, Javier ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGULAR COORDINATES; ATOM WAVE FUNCTION; CONFIGURATION INTERACTIONS; COULOMB PROBLEMS; DOUBLY EXCITED STATE; GAUSS-LAGUERRE; HIGHLY EXCITED STATE; INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES; INTERACTION TERM; IONIZATION THRESHOLDS; MATRIX ELEMENTS; RADIAL COORDINATES; RECURRENCE RELATIONS; ROTATION METHODS; S STATE; SMALL SIZE; SPECTRAL METHODS; SPECTRAL REPRESENTATIONS; SPHERICAL HARMONICS; STURMIAN;

ELECTRON-ELECTRON INTERACTIONS; EXCITED STATES; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; HELIUM; SPECTROSCOPY; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

ELECTRONS;

EID: 69249154649     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022511     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. R. P. Madden and K. Codling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 516 (1963). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.516
2. C. D. Lin, Phys. Rep. 257, 1 (1995). 10.1016/0370-1573(94)00094-J
3. A. Burgers, D. Wintgen, and J.-M. Rost, J. Phys. B 28, 3163 (1995). 10.1088/0953-4075/28/15/010
4. B. Grémaud and D. Delande, Europhys. Lett. 40, 363 (1997). 10.1209/epl/i1997-00472-2
5. J. M. Rost, K. Schulz, M. Domke, and G. Kaindl, J. Phys. B 30, 4663 (1997). 10.1088/0953-4075/30/21/010
6. G. Tanner, K. Richter, and J.-M. Rost, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 497 (2000). 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.497
7. E. Foumouo, G. L. Kamta, G. Edah, and B. Piraux, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063409 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.063409
8. O. Sinanoǧlu and D. R. Herrick, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 886 (1975). 10.1063/1.430540
9. D. R. Herrick and O. Sinanoǧlu, Phys. Rev. A 11, 97 (1975). 10.1103/PhysRevA.11.97
10. A. Czasch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243003 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 243003
11. M. Domke, K. Schulz, G. Remmers, G. Kaindl, and D. Wintgen, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1424 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.1424
12. Y. H. Jiang, R. Püttner, D. Delande, M. Martins, and G. Kaindl, Phys. Rev. A 78, 021401 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.021401
13. G. Handke, M. Draeger, and H. Friedrich, Physica A 197, 113 (1993). 10.1016/0378-4371(93)90461-C
14. G. Handke, M. Draeger, W. Ihra, and H. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. A 48, 3699 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3699
15. M. Draeger, G. Handke, W. Ihra, and H. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3793 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3793
16. W. Ihra, M. Draeger, G. Handke, and H. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3752 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3752
17. A.-T. Le, T. Morishita, X.-M. Tong, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 72, 032511 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032511
18. J. Xu, A.-T. Le, T. Morishita, and C. D. Lin, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012701 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012701
19. J. Madroñero, P. Schlagheck, L. Hilico, B. Grémaud, D. Delande, and A. Buchleitner, Europhys. Lett. 70, 183 (2005). 10.1209/epl/i2004-10474-0
20. K. Richter and D. Wintgen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1965 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1965
21. J. Eiglsperger and J. Madroñero, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022512 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.022512
22. G. J. Madroñero Pabón, Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München, 2004 (http://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/ 00002187).
23. J. Madroñero and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. A 77, 053402 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.053402
24. C. L. Pekeris, Phys. Rev. 112, 1649 (1958). 10.1103/PhysRev.112.1649
25. M. Rotenberg, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 6, 233 (1970).
26. E. Huens, B. Piraux, A. Bugacov, and M. Gajda, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2132 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2132
27. G. Lagmago Kamta, B. Piraux, and A. Scrinzi, Phys. Rev. A 63, 040502 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.040502
28. L. Feng and H. W. van der Hart, Phys. Rev. A 66, 031402 (R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.031402
29. L. Feng and H. W. van der Hart, J. Phys. B 36, L1 (2003). 10.1088/0953-4075/36/1/101
30. C. W. McCurdy, D. A. Horner, T. N. Rescigno, and F. Martín, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032707 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.032707
31. S. Laulan and H. Bachau, Phys. Rev. A 69, 033408 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.033408
32. P. Antoine, E. Foumouo, B. Piraux, T. Shimizu, H. Hasegawa, Y. Nabekawa, and K. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023415 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.023415
33. T. Nubbemeyer, K. Gorling, A. Saenz, U. Eichmann, and W. Sandner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233001 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.233001
34. J. S. Parker, B. J. S. Doherty, K. T. Taylor, K. D. Schultz, C. I. Blaga, and L. F. DiMauro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 133001 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 133001
35. J. S. Parker, K. J. Meharg, G. A. McKenna, and K. T. Taylor, J. Phys. B 40, 1729 (2007). 10.1088/0953-4075/40/10/008
36. J. Zamastil, J. Čížek, M. Kalhous, L. Skála, and M. Šimánek, J. Math. Phys. 45, 2674 (2004). 10.1063/1.1760844
37. J. Zamastil, F. Vinette, and M. Šimánek, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022506 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022506
38. G. Lagmago Kamta, Ph.D. thesis, Université Nationale du Bénin, 1999.
39. D. A. Varschalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008).
40. This relation does not mean that the parity of a given state depends on the angular momentum L. In fact, this relation defines the parity of the states that are actually coupled by the dipole interaction Hamiltonian.
41. J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269 (1971). 10.1007/BF01877510
42. E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 280 (1971). 10.1007/BF01877511
43. B. Simon, Ann. Math. 97, 247 (1973). 10.2307/1970847
44. W. P. Reinhardt, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 223 (1982). 10.1146/annurev.pc.33.100182.001255
45. Y. Ho, Phys. Rep. 99, 1 (1983). 10.1016/0370-1573(83)90112-6
46. S. Graffi, V. Grecchi, and H. J. Silverstone, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Sect. A 42, 215 (1985).
47. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: Analysis of Operators (Academic, New York, 1978), Vol. IV.
48. M. Pont and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3764 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.3764
49. A. Bohm, M. Gadella, and G. B. Mainland, Am. J. Phys. 57, 1103 (1989). 10.1119/1.15797
50. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, Lehrbuch der Theoretischen Physik: III Quantenmechanik (Akademie-Verlag Berlin, 1979).
51. M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1972).
52. The coefficients [Eq. 27] are accordingly related to the coefficients (νi, λi, κi, ni, li, ki Ni) p=1 of through the relation (νi, λi, κi, ni, li, ki Ni) = κi ki ξi Ni νi ni (νi, λi, κi, ni, li, ki Ni) p=1.
53. C. Lanczos, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 45, 255 (1950).
54. B. N. Parlett and D. S. Scott, Math. Comput. 33, 217 (1979). 10.2307/2006037
55. T. Ericsson and A. Ruhe, Math. Comput. 35, 1251 (1980). 10.2307/2006390
56. B. Grémaud, Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris 6, 1997.
57. C. C. J. Roothaan and A. W. Weiss, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 194 (1960). 10.1103/RevModPhys.32.194
58. C. W. Byun, N. N. Choi, M.-H. Lee, and G. Tanner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 113001 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.113001