Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2010-2018

  Hartley, James ^a   Betts, Lucy ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; MEDICAL SCIENCE; QUALITY OF INFORMATION; SAMPLE SIZES; STRUCTURED ABSTRACT;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 69249146714     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21102     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987). A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106(4), 598-604.
2. American National Standards Institute. (1997). Guidelines for abstracts. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press.
3. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th edition). Washington: American Psychological Association.
4. Budgen, D., Kitchenham, B.A., Charters, S.M., Turner, M., Brereton, P., & Linkman, S. (2008). Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: A randomised experiment. Empirical Software Engineering, 13(4), 435-468.
5. Burns, K., Adhikari, N.K.J., Kho, M., Meade, M.O., Patel, R.K., Sinuff, T et al. (2005). Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality reporting score. Critical Care Medicine, 33(9), 1937-1945. (Pubitemid 41306513)
6. Donovan, K. (2009). A tax on productivity? Journal of Scholarly Publication, 40(2), 201-205.
7. Dupuy, A., Khosrotehrani. K., Lebbe, C., Rybojad, M., & Morel, O. (2003). Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals. Archives of Dermatology, 139, 589-593.
8. Gotzshe, P. (2006). Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 333, 231-234. (Pubitemid 44406715)
9. Harris, A.H., Standard, S., Brunning, J.L., Casey, S.L. Goldberg, J.H., Oliver, L., et al. (2002). The accuracy of abstracts in psychology journals. Journal of Psychology, 136(2), 141-148.
10. Hartley, J. (1994). Three ways to improve the clarity of journal abstracts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2), 331-343.
11. Hartley, J. (2000a). Typographic settings for structured abstracts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(4), 355-365.
12. Hartley, J. (2000b). Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 273-277.
13. Hartley, J. (2002). Do structured abstracts take more space? And does it matter? Journal of Information Science, 28(5), 437-442.
14. Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in Psychology. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379.
15. Hartley, J. (2004a). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92, 3, 368-371.
16. Hartley, J. (2004b). More sex please, we're psychologists. The Psychologist, 17(2), 80-81.
17. Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Abingdon: Routledge.
18. Hartley, J., & Benjamin, M. (1998). An evaluation of structured abstracts in journals published by the British Psychological Society. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 443-456.
19. Hartley, J., & Betts, L. (2007). The effects of spacing and titles on judgements of the effectiveness of structured abstracts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2325-2340.
20. Hopewell, S., Eisinga, A., & Clarke, M. (2008). Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts. Journal of Information Science, 34(2), 162-173.
21. Huth, E.J., & Case, K. (2002). Annals of Internal Medicine at age 75: Reflections on the past 25 years. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137(1), 34-45.
22. Hyett, M., & Parker, G. (2009). Can the highly cited psychiatric paper be predicted early? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43 (2), 173-176.
23. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24. Lokker, C., McKibbon, K.A., McKinlay, R.J., Wilczynski, N.L., & Haynes, R.B. (2008). Predication of citation rates for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: Retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 336, 7645, 655-657.
25. Mabe, M.A., & Amin, M. (2002). Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. Aslib Proceedings, 54(3), 149-157.
26. Manten, A.A. (1980). The growth of European scientific journal publishing before 1850. In Meadows, J. (Ed.), Development of science publishing in Europe (pp. 1-22). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Martin, P.M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43.
28. Mcintosh, N., Due, G., & Sedlin, G. (1999). Structure improves content and peer review of abstracts submitted to scientific meetings. European Science Editing, 25(2), 43-47.
29. Meadows, A.J. (1980). Access to the results of scientific research: Developments in Victorian Britain. In Meadows, J. (Ed.), Development of science publishing in Europe (pp. 43-62). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30. Milgram, S, (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 67(34), 371-378.
31. Nakayama, T., Hirai, N., Yamazaki, S., & Naito, N. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237-242.
32. Pattal, E.A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J.C. (2008). Parental involvement on homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101.
33. Peacock, P.J., Peters, TJ., & Peacock, J.L. (2009). How well do structured abstracts reflect the articles they summarise? European Science Editing, 35(1), 3-5.
34. Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A., & Burmeister, L.R (1999). Accuracy of datain abstracts in published research articles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 28(12), 1110-1111.
35. Salager-Meyer, R (1991). Medical English abstracts: How well are they structured? Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 42(7), 528-531.
36. Salager-Meyer, R (1994). Reading medical English abstracts: A genre study of the interaction between structural variables and the reader's linguisticoconceptual competence. Journal of Research in Reading, 17(2), 120-146.
37. Sauperl, S., Klasinc, J., &Luzar, S. (2008). Components of abstracts: Logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(9), 1420-1432.
38. Sharma, S., & Harrison, J.E. (2006). Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dental Orthopedics, 130(4), 523-530.
39. Siebers, R. (2000). How accurate is data in abstracts of research journals? New Zealand Medical Laboratory Science, 54, 22-24.
40. Siebers, R. (2001). Data inconsistencies in abstracts of articles in Clinical Chemistry. Clinical Chemistry, 47(1), 1.
41. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Taddio, A., Pain, T., Fassons, RR, Boon, H., Ilersich, A.L., & Einarson, T.R. (1994). Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, and the Journal of the American Medical Association. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150(10), 1611-1615.
43. Tibbo, H.R. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines: A content analysis of abstracts from the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval. Library & Information Science Research, 14(1), 31-56.
44. Wilczynski, N.L., Walker, CJ., McKibbon, K.A., & Haynes, R.B. (1995). Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MEDLINE. MEDINFO Proceedings, 8(2), 1457-1461.
45. Wong, H.-L., Truong, D., Mahamed, A., Davidian, C., Zana, Z., & Einarson, T. R. (2005). Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association: A 10-year follow up study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 21, 4, 467-474(8).