Automatic collision avoidance of ships

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment

Volumn 223, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 33-46

  Xue, Y ^a,b,c   Lee, B S ^a   Han, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Henry Dyer Building   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collision avoidance; Manoeuvring simulator; Potential field; Speed vector

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL POTENTIAL FIELDS; AUTOMATIC SIMULATION; KEY ELEMENTS; MANOEUVRING SIMULATOR; POTENTIAL FIELD; PRACTICAL METHOD; SHIP MANOEUVRING; TEST CASE; TRAJECTORY PLANNING; ROUTE FINDINGS;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SHIPS;

SHIPS; COLLISION AVOIDANCE;

EID: 69249136271     PISSN: 14750902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/14750902JEME123     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Smith, C. Collision avoidance system and safe path generation, 4th year project, University of Strath-clyde, 2008.
2. Shenhua Yang, Lina Li, Yongfeng Suo, and Guoquan Chen Study on construction of simulation platform for vessel automatic anticollision and its test method. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Jinan, China, 2007.
3. Burnay, S., Manoeuvring simulation: a valuable aid to ship mooring and berthing, available from http://www.bmtseatech.co.uk.
4. Fossen, T. I. Guidance and control of ocean vehicles, 1994 (Wiley, Chichester).
5. Fossen, T. I. Marine control systems: guidance, navigation and control of ships, rigs and underwater vehicles, 1st edition, 2002 (Marine Cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway).
6. Ito, M., Feifei Zhang, and Yoshida, N. Collision avoidance control of ship with genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Kohala Coast, Hawaii, USA, August 1999, Vol.2, pp. 1791-1796.
7. Zhao, J., Tan, M., Price, W. G., and Wilson, P. A. DCPA simulation model for automatic collision avoidance decision making system using fuzzy sets. Proceedings of OCEANS '94: Oceans Engineering for Today's Technology and Tomorrow's Preservation, Brest, France, September 1994, Vol.2, pp. 244-249.
8. Saburo Tsuruta, Hisashi Matsumura, Masaaki Inaishi, Hayama Imazu, and Akio M. Sugisaki Basic research on an expert system for navigation at sea. Jap. Inst. Navigation, 1987, 77, 133-139.
9. Smierzchalski, R. and Michalewicz, Z. Modeling of ship trajectory in collision situations by an evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 4(3), 227-241.
10. Khatib, O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. J. Robotics Res., 1986, 5 (1), 90-98.
11. Crockcroft, A. N. and Lameijer, J. N. F. A guide to the collision avoidance rules, 5th edition, 1996 (BH Newnes, Oxford).
12. Hilgert, H. and Baldauf, M. A common risk model for the assessment of encounter situations on board ships. Ocean Dynamics, 1997, 49(4), 531-542.
13. Tran, T., Harris, C. J., and Wilson, P. A. A vessel management expert system. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2002, 216(2), 161-177. DOI: 10.1243/ 147509002762224379.
14. Storvik, M. Guidance system for automatic approach to a ship, Master's thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, 2003.